Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
rantnrave

GUARDIAN: What’s the point of building a million new homes if they’re not fit to live in?

Recommended Posts

They might be the most ubiquitous feature of the modern English landscape, and yet they barely attract any comment: those sprawling newbuild housing developments that seem to surround almost every town and city, offering a promise of comfort and security and a vital foot on the property ladder.

More often than not, their avenues and culs-de-sac will have faux-bucolic names often ending in “meadows”, “mead”, or “wood”. The life therein seems profoundly modern: stripped of much history or sense of shared experience so that everything suggests the weightlessness of suburbia. Yet for all the outward gleam, something is wrong.

This week the Guardian reported that Bovis is set to award people who live in some of its newbuild homes a total of £7m in compensation, in response to claims that houses have faulty plumbing or wiring, missing insulation, and other serious defects. Some people say they were offered money to move into homes that have not been completed. When the news broke, the Bovis share price fell by 10%, wiping £100m off its stock market value.

This is just one part of a bigger story of complaints about Britain’s construction giants – and what happens when the rush to build leads to corners being cut and houses left either unfinished or deeply defective. On social media there are hundreds-strong groups telling their personal stories: “The toilet leaked into the living room and when my plumber came to fix it he found the toilet had not been installed correctly”; “having my kitchen ripped out for the second time”; “no insulation in roof”; “mould growing all over the house … too dangerous too live in as I have asthma”.

Meanwhile, the pressure is on to build as many new homes as possible. Even if it is behind on its targets, the government still wants a million to have been put up by 2020. The year 2015 saw a big jump in completed builds: 142,890 homes were finished, a 20% year-on-year increase. Last year the number was put at more than 150,000.

Behind these increases sat policies such as the new homes bonus (which gives councils cash rewards for granting planning permission for newbuild developments) and George Osborne’s help-to-buy scheme – now drastically stripped back, although the fact that interest-free loans are still available for newbuild homes means that the policy will carry on incentivising builders to put up houses.

But in privately owned developments and new social housing, and the mixed-tenure places that combine the two, problems abound. Last month I spent two weeks reporting on the case of the Orchard Village estate on the Essex/east London border, and properties split between homeowners and tenants whose problems – with leaks and damp, and allegedly faulty fire protection and dangerous levels of methane – are mind-boggling.

Since then I have been contacted by people in other newly built developments who have suffered similar problems. The most spectacular case is that of a development called Solomon’s Passage in Peckham, south London: four housing blocks completed in 2010 that were plagued with leaks, fire protection issues and defective balconies, until the housing association in charge – Wandle, which owns about 7,000 homes across the capital – decided to tear two of them down and start again.
 
The recession, says the report, pushed out as much as half of the construction industry’s skilled labour, much of which is yet to return. A fifth of the existing building workforce is set to retire in the next five to 10 years. And still the call blithely goes out from Westminster and Whitehall: build, build, build.

There are also issues surrounding how the building trade is monitored. Industry standards are set by the National House Building Council, which is also in charge of most of the 10-year warranties that cover new homes: in 2015-16 it paid £90m to homeowners affected by problems, compared with only £37m 10 years before.

The NHBC also pays out millions to housebuilding companies every year via a de facto profit-share arrangement which rewards the firms who put up the most new homes. In addition it insists that some homeowners claiming compensation sign gagging orders that reportedly extend to conversations with their neighbours. This is a funny way for a supposed honest broker to behave, and underlines the sense of helplessness felt by people at the blunt end.

So does the increasingly oligopolistic nature of the industry. There are said to be 19,000 fewer firms involved in UK building than when the recession struck, and the trade is now dominated by such giants as Barratt, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey, Bellway, Redrow, Bloor Homes and Bovis. In that sense, the rage and dismay all over social media are even more understandable: people up against distant conglomerates inevitably feel like mere specks shouting at monoliths.

 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.

Quote

This week the Guardian reported that Bovis is set to award people who live in some of its newbuild homes a total of £7m in compensation, in response to claims that houses have faulty plumbing or wiring, missing insulation, and other serious defects. Some people say they were offered money to move into homes that have not been completed. When the news broke, the Bovis share price fell by 10%, wiping £100m off its stock market value.

Not only shoddy building (housing minister Barwell would likely call that "innovative") but it bears repeating that on present new home trends they're also likely to be the tiniest in europe and set to get even tinier if Barwell's "innovate" ideas on size are actually implemented.

Edited by billybong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.

Quote

The year 2015 saw a big jump in completed builds: 142,890 homes were finished, a 20% year-on-year increase. 

According to the gov.uk site

  • Quote

     

    • annual housing supply in England amounted to 136,610 net additional dwellings in 2013 to 2014, a 10% increase in net additional dwellings from 2012 to 2013
    • the 136,610 net additions figure for 2013 to 2014 comprised 130,340 new build homes, 4,470 additional homes resulting from conversions, 12,520 additional homes resulting from change of use, 1,330 other gains and a loss of 12,060 homes through demolitions

     

    An approximate increase from 130,340 to 142,890 new homes seems to be pretty much standing still rather than "a 20% year-on-year increase".  In any event it seems to be less than 10%. 

  • To meet the 1 million new homes by 2020 target (end of this Parliament according to the guardian link in the text - see below) they're going to have to increase the new home building numbers to almost 250,000 a year.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/21/1m-more-homes-in-england-by-2020-government

Edited by billybong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   22 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.