Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Economists think London's property bubble will finally burst in 2017


maverick73

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

Looks like the FT are not the only ones to this were on the edge of small corrections price corrections (10%). Hopefully, the actions match the words. I used to be a home owner in Ruislip and bought a home in 2005 for £205k I recently saw a house for sale on the same street for £650k. It was a shock to me how much a three-bedroom terraced house is going for in London, especially when the salaries have been stagnant or dropping in some cases. I almost feel that an elite is trying to remove those who grew up in an area, to make way for richer cliental from abroad. 

http://uk.businessinsider.com/times-survey-londons-property-bubble-will-finally-burst-in-2017-2016-12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442

They give the average property price in London as "£474,000 in 2016" yet Theresa May said in Parliament in July that it was £676,000. £474K sounds too low to me.

They also say the average London property price was " £257,000 in 2006". Again, sounds too low, but crazy to think we've had pretty much flat wage growth since then and yet £250K barely buys you a flat in zone 5 or 6 these days.

I see they say Royal Institute for Chartered Surveyors (RICS) forecasts "foreign investment offsetting a decline in UK buyers" and I fear that will be the problem. A small decline in prices is just going to attract investors who'll think London is having a sale. So until the government take steps to prevent investors...

 

Edited by Tempus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
10 minutes ago, spyguy said:

Theyve had a sneaky look at the last few quarters figures.

+1000.  I know a team at one of the largest estate companies in the US (revenue in the $ billions) who've informed me that PCL 2m+ sales have stopped dead.  Times like this honest journalism might help, but alas, who I am kidding!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445

I bought in Ruislip in 2004 (a flat) sold for a loss in 2012 taking inflation into account. Prices in the block now over 50% higher lol. 

Theres no way work will ever get me a house here anymore, so I work for myself and pay zero tax instead. I don't earn much, but what difference does it make, working a lot or a little will neither get me a house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446

 

9 minutes ago, honkydonkey said:

I bought in Ruislip in 2004 (a flat) sold for a loss in 2012 taking inflation into account. Prices in the block now over 50% higher lol. 

Theres no way work will ever get me a house here anymore, so I work for myself and pay zero tax instead. I don't earn much, but what difference does it make, working a lot or a little will neither get me a house.

The linked article says the London bull run went from 2006 to 2016, but it really accelerated from 2012-16 because of a carry trade, due to Sterling's overvaluation.

As that carry trade collapses, you might be able to move back into your flat at 2012 prices in another four years of years. But you would have to live in Ruislip:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448

A 1-bed flat above a shop appears to start at £250,000 in Ruislip looking at Rightmove, though that looks unusually cheap. £300-£400K looks a more realistic budget for a decent flat. Basic houses start at £450,000.

Like the rest of London, an average earner hasn't got a prayer of buying using just their salary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
3 hours ago, blackhole said:

+1000.  I know a team at one of the largest estate companies in the US (revenue in the $ billions) who've informed me that PCL 2m+ sales have stopped dead.  Times like this honest journalism might help, but alas, who I am kidding!

Henry Pryor's been tweeting about this fairly steadily.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410

If that isn't the top end crashing, I don't know what is.

When the top end crashes, what happens to the bit just below the top? Because that suddently becomes the same price as the top... ah right that crashes too I get it, what about the middle? because that becomes the same price as the top too... etc etc

 

mama always said MEGAbubble is as MEGAbubble does

Happy new year all! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12 hours ago, Tempus said:

A 1-bed flat above a shop appears to start at £250,000 in Ruislip looking at Rightmove, though that looks unusually cheap. £300-£400K looks a more realistic budget for a decent flat. Basic houses start at £450,000.

Like the rest of London, an average earner hasn't got a prayer of buying using just their salary. 

However what it may sell for or whatever justifies the price right now is nonsensical in any which way it is framed.  Ruislip is not PCL and never will be, no filmstar, rockstar or even any self respecting Chinese money launderer would choose Ruislip so in effect this suburb like many should be related to median or less wages in and around London.  In this case I would say 3x the median wage of £30K ie £90k for a flat above a shop.    So because £300K++ may be the normal selling price then a current asking price of £250,000 is still extremely expensive by any sane reckoning..   One day the prices in London will have to open up to locals with jobs, not just speculators on a mission to outdo each other with price paid... lets hope its 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
6 hours ago, maverick73 said:

I’m presuming the crash will be driven by sentiment. I wonder what the Bank of England will do next, will they copy the American dream and raise rates in tandem or recline with their hands tied behind their backs.

 

 

I`m no expert but i think the BOE will have no choice soon...just look out for the justification puff pieces ,the commons started the ball rolling with their unintended consequences of zero rate policy debate in the commons ...i`m just waiting for the savers have suffered long enough articles ...it`s game on then  IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
28 minutes ago, long time lurking said:

I`m no expert but i think the BOE will have no choice soon...just look out for the justification puff pieces ,the commons started the ball rolling with their unintended consequences of zero rate policy debate in the commons ...i`m just waiting for the savers have suffered long enough articles ...it`s game on then  IMO

Yes, savers have suffered for nine years to allow the financial markets to sweep their invisible messes under the hidden carpets, awaiting a British economist to be appointed as the leader of the monitory policy ahead of the Eurocrat's who sit at the round table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
7 hours ago, maverick73 said:

I’m presuming the crash will be driven by sentiment. I wonder what the Bank of England will do next, will they copy the American dream and raise rates in tandem or recline with their hands tied behind their backs.

They already need to back out of the post Brexit rate drop that just triggered a boom in consumer borrowing.  They have nowhere to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
38 minutes ago, interestrateripoff said:

Sounds like super Carney needs to come to the rescue.

I do worry what that muppet will do to try to avoid HPC. Who knows how much harm he'll inflict, he's even bought into PCL so god save us from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420

Carney is a particularly bad B of E guv. He is a one-trick-pony - that being stoking house price bubbles.

But all guvnors since and including Eddie George are as much to blame. "Steady Eddie" should have let the Uk economy go into recession after 9/11, instead he began the house price inflation which has become such a huge political, social and economic curse. 

Infact, the only long term solution is to abolish central banks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422
2 hours ago, Blod said:

I do worry what that muppet will do to try to avoid HPC. Who knows how much harm he'll inflict, he's even bought into PCL so god save us from him.

The Canadian dummy's already working flat out to ensure there's no hpc. The Term Funding Scheme announced last August gives lenders access to a so-called 'cost-effective' source of reserves (potentially £100bn @ 0.25% for the next four years) to support lending to the real economy. They key issue is how the air-money gets spent. Can Carney and the banksters entice significant numbers of FTBs into the market again, or will the lenders end up using it to bolster their own bottom-lines?

Edited by zugzwang
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
1 hour ago, zugzwang said:

The Canadian dummy's already working flat out to ensure there's no hpc. The Term Funding Scheme announced last August gives lenders access to a so-called 'cost-effective' source of reserves (potentially £100bn @ 0.25% for the next four years) to support lending to the real economy. They key issue is how the air-money gets spent. Can Carney and the banksters entice significant numbers of FTBs into the market again, or will the lenders end up using it to bolster their own bottom-lines?

The banks could take the money and flush it into their own coffers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
24
HOLA4425

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information