Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Brexit What Happens Next Thread ---multiple merged threads.


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
1 hour ago, crouch said:

In particular the failure of the Euro will be seen as almost insane

Out of interest, what is your opinion on the collapse of Bretton Woods?

6 minutes ago, wish I could afford one said:

We already had our HPC

Indeed. I did not understand how much would be sacrificed after 2007/8. Lesson learned, I took a mortgage soon after, deciding that I'd rather play a rigged game on the same side as those doing the rigging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
12 minutes ago, wish I could afford one said:

Sounds like a great idea...  What happens when they then go cash flow negative?  In any business cash is king.  The aim is to reduce working capital not increase it.

Meanwhile their global competitors keep working on their business efficiency.

Who said this was not inconvenient? There will be problems; my point is that it is not Armageddon, just a fairly routine contingency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3
HOLA444
28 minutes ago, Confusion of VIs said:

 

Stockpilng won't protect the likes of Honda, Nissan, and Toyota. If we get a no deal exit they will face tarrifs. on their components coming in and cars going out. Overnight they will become terminally unprofitable.

Forget what you hear about them stockpiling, that's to cover a few days of disruption if we get a deal.

Their no deal plans are, as far as is possible,  to use up all their stocks assembling cars ship them out and then close the plants for "maintenance". 

If there is a no deal exit, it is likely those plants will never reopen. 

I'm sure they've been considering this for some time and, one way or another will get around it. Businesses are used to this.

As for it being terminal; maybe, maybe not - I have no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447
2 hours ago, crouch said:

I'm not blaming them I'm merely saying that Brexit is a contingency and the function of management is to plan for contingencies. If bad weather is forecast they should plan for that; it's no different in principle. 

Err right - do you run a business?

Firstly it's been impossible to tell what "Brexit" will actually mean.  Sure we've stockpiled raw materials and talked to European customers about how we can keep them supplied if there's trouble at the ports (generally meaning us funding consignment stocks at their premises).  That's OK for a couple of months.

Longer term we still have no idea what regulatory regime will apply, whether our products which are currently certified by European body will continue to be certified (and what if any UK certification process will replace it, and if it does this will be recognised in Europe).  As a result a number of our European customers are now seeking alternative supply from our EU based competitors as we are not in a position to answer some pretty basic questions.

These are real issues which are already resulting in lost business for the UK.  If we can't resolve them quickly and lose business as a result then people's jobs are at risk.

Part of our contingency plan is redundancies if we are unable to maintain the same level of exports to the EU.  If it comes to this is there any message you'd like to pass on to those who loose their jobs?

Edited by Exiled Canadian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
8
HOLA449
7 minutes ago, crouch said:

I'm sure they've been considering this for some time and, one way or another will get around it. Businesses are used to this.

As for it being terminal; maybe, maybe not - I have no idea.

No they're not.  Good businesses do not increase their inventories they constantly work to reduce them.

Even if they wanted to where are they going to put all these inventories?  Under tarps in the car park? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
17 minutes ago, wish I could afford one said:

So you're expecting every business that could be greatly affected by Brexit to expend precious resources (people and money) on trying to second guess what might happen and then put processes in place to deal with all those what ifs?

Personally, I think a better option would be for our politicians to grow a pair and make some decisions for the betterment of the country vs themselves and their party.  That way those said businesses can use their precious resources to figure out how better to take on their now very global competition.  Then if they have any left after that they might want to return some of it in the form of dividends to the shareholders, which includes our pension funds.

Brexiteers are not spending their money on contingency .......what do they care. The fact that a lot of business's may not even be able to afford to make these plans is water off a ducks back to these guys.....not to mention those who rely on current frictionless trade arrangements.

They are so certain that the EU is evil/will inplode that anything is justifiable.........it's nothing but a cult..... these same guys will be saying 'in twenty years time'......in twenty years time...whilst the row will be scratching their heads wondering why the EU armagedonist idiots where allowed to inflict so much misery to a former prosperous nation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411
5 minutes ago, Exiled Canadian said:

Err right - do you run a business?

Firstly it's been impossible to tell what "Brexit" will actually mean.  Sure we've stockpiled raw materials and talked to European customers about how we can keep them supplied if there's trouble at the ports (generally meaning us funding consignment stocks at their premises).  That's OK for a couple of months.

Longer term we still have no idea what regulatory regime will apply, whether our products which are currently certified by European body will continue to be certified (and what if any UK certification process will replace it, and if it does this will be recognised in Europe).  As a result a number of our European customers are now seeking alternative supply from our EU based competitors as we are not in a position to answer some pretty basic questions.

These are real issues which are already resulting in lost business for the UK.  If we can't resolve them quickly and lose business as a result then people's jobs are at risk.

Part of our contingency plan is redundancies if we are unable to maintain the same level of exports to the EU.  If it comes to this is there any message you'd like to pass on to those who loose their jobs?

This.

I can imagine what the global competitors have in the O of their SWOT analyses these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
2 minutes ago, IMHAL said:

Brexiteers are not spending their money on contingency .......what do they care. The fact that a lot of business's may not even be able to afford to make these plans is water off a ducks back to these guys.....not to mention those who rely on current frictionless trade arrangements.

They are so certain that the EU is evil/will inplode that anything is justifiable.........it's nothing but a cult..... these same guys will be saying 'in twenty years time'......in twenty years time...whilst the row will be scratching their heads wondering why the EU armagedonist idiots where allowed to inflict so much misery to a former prosperous nation.

I must have mis-remembered.  Wasn't JRM saying that we'd see all the unicorns in 50 years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
1 minute ago, crouch said:

On balance good. Floating currencies do give a degree of flexibility.

Ok, just wanted to fix your opinion. Glad it aligns with your view that the Euro is bad, inconvenient otherwise.

One way of looking at floating currencies is a measure of relative wealth/earnings. Under a fixed rate system, countries would have to intentionally lower their minimum wages and cut salaries if they decided they wanted to compete on price rather than quality. The population won't let them do it though. Luckily with a floating rate system, the population don't get a choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
6 minutes ago, dugsbody said:

Ok, just wanted to fix your opinion. Glad it aligns with your view that the Euro is bad, inconvenient otherwise.

One way of looking at floating currencies is a measure of relative wealth/earnings. Under a fixed rate system, countries would have to intentionally lower their minimum wages and cut salaries if they decided they wanted to compete on price rather than quality. The population won't let them do it though. Luckily with a floating rate system, the population don't get a choice.

...or notice they're being made globally poorer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
57 minutes ago, Exiled Canadian said:

Err right - do you run a business?

Firstly it's been impossible to tell what "Brexit" will actually mean.  Sure we've stockpiled raw materials and talked to European customers about how we can keep them supplied if there's trouble at the ports (generally meaning us funding consignment stocks at their premises).  That's OK for a couple of months.

Longer term we still have no idea what regulatory regime will apply, whether our products which are currently certified by European body will continue to be certified (and what if any UK certification process will replace it, and if it does this will be recognised in Europe).  As a result a number of our European customers are now seeking alternative supply from our EU based competitors as we are not in a position to answer some pretty basic questions.

These are real issues which are already resulting in lost business for the UK.  If we can't resolve them quickly and lose business as a result then people's jobs are at risk.

Part of our contingency plan is redundancies if we are unable to maintain the same level of exports to the EU.  If it comes to this is there any message you'd like to pass on to those who loose their jobs?

Who has said there won't be problems? Not me. Some businesses will be affected severely, including yours from the sound of it. Many won't.

Also you are conflating the Brexit decision in principle with the subsequent incompetence, which is staggering and undeniable. Most of your post details incompetence and you want to elide that with the decision in principle. You can't.

Edited by crouch
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
22 minutes ago, wish I could afford one said:

I must have mis-remembered.  Wasn't JRM saying that we'd see all the unicorns in 50 years?

Depends on who he is talking to. 50 to 100 years. But there is this:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/10/jacob-rees-mogg-no-deal-brexit-will-boost-uk-economy-11-trillion/

 

Edited by jonb2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
13 minutes ago, dugsbody said:

Ok, just wanted to fix your opinion. Glad it aligns with your view that the Euro is bad, inconvenient otherwise.

One way of looking at floating currencies is a measure of relative wealth/earnings. Under a fixed rate system, countries would have to intentionally lower their minimum wages and cut salariesexchange rate if they decided they wanted to compete on price rather than quality. The population won't let them do it though. Luckily with a floating rate system, the population don't get a choice.

The problem with the Euro is that it does not have fiscal or banking union.

Also the Euro exchange rate is inappropriate for some countries in the EZ. Because individual members do not control the Euro exchange rate they cannot devalue as a tool.

The ECB controls the interest rate.

In addition the Growth and Stability Pact puts controls on fiscal deficits so that there are limits to what can be done here.

The net effect is that members of the EZ have to use internal devaluation as an adjustment mechanism. This cam be painful as Germany found out when it carried out the Hartz 4 reforms.

The Euro is almost guaranteed to fail and it may take the EU with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
35 minutes ago, crouch said:

The problem with the Euro is that it does not have fiscal or banking union.

Also the Euro exchange rate is inappropriate for some countries in the EZ. Because individual members do not control the Euro exchange rate they cannot devalue as a tool.

The ECB controls the interest rate.

In addition the Growth and Stability Pact puts controls on fiscal deficits so that there are limits to what can be done here.

The net effect is that members of the EZ have to use internal devaluation as an adjustment mechanism. This cam be painful as Germany found out when it carried out the Hartz 4 reforms.

Yes, this is what I've said above. Populations don't like their government making them poorer but a floating rate currency allows this to happen and not much the people can do about it. Look at us in the UK. Several years ago before brexit I turned down a role in Switzerland paying roughly my UK salary + 10% (at the time). I regret it now. Since then I've received a 20% pay-cut in international currency due to GBP drop. 

The Euro was obviously designed to stop countries from competing by playing currency wars and all that implies while bringing more transparency, but it has brought its own set of problems. I'm undecided if this is good or not. I can understand the rationale but unfortunately optics plays a part.

Edited by dugsbody
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422
1 minute ago, MonsieurCopperCrutch said:

Ah yet another Brexshit negative - inconvenient.

When will you leavers start to list the benefits of Brexshit? 

I think they already have. The ability to make life better for people by ceasing to pool some sovereignty with a particular group of nations. And if we have to endure things being worse in practice in order to regain the theoretical ability to make things better, it is worth it. Apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
1 hour ago, Exiled Canadian said:

Err right - do you run a business?

Firstly it's been impossible to tell what "Brexit" will actually mean.  Sure we've stockpiled raw materials and talked to European customers about how we can keep them supplied if there's trouble at the ports (generally meaning us funding consignment stocks at their premises).  That's OK for a couple of months.

Longer term we still have no idea what regulatory regime will apply, whether our products which are currently certified by European body will continue to be certified (and what if any UK certification process will replace it, and if it does this will be recognised in Europe).  As a result a number of our European customers are now seeking alternative supply from our EU based competitors as we are not in a position to answer some pretty basic questions.

These are real issues which are already resulting in lost business for the UK.  If we can't resolve them quickly and lose business as a result then people's jobs are at risk.

Part of our contingency plan is redundancies if we are unable to maintain the same level of exports to the EU.  If it comes to this is there any message you'd like to pass on to those who loose their jobs?

Cheaper housing, sovereignty, innit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
11 minutes ago, dugsbody said:

Yes, this is what I've said above. Populations don't like their government making them poorer but a floating rate currency allows this to happen and not much the people can do about it. Look at us in the UK. Several years ago before brexit I turned down a role in Switzerland paying roughly my UK salary + 10% (at the time). I regret it now. Since then I've received a 20% pay-cut in international currency due to GBP drop. 

The Euro was obviously designed to stop countries from competing by playing currency wars and all that implies while bringing more transparency, but it has brought its own set of problems. I'm undecided if this is good or not. I can understand the rationale but unfortunately optics plays a part.

It was also meant to drive convergence by defining discipline via both the exchange rate and a structure for fiscal policy limits. The legacy (entry) rates gave the German (and Netherlands)economy a permanent boost by giving them a devaluation and harmed  the PIIGS by foisting an appreciation.

This has driven divergence instead of convergence and the fiscal strictures and an interest rate determined elsewhere have meant there are few tools short of internal wage suppression and general austerity. If you were a struggling economy you would not like to be in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information