Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
R K

Unmasking The Men Behind Zero Hedge

Recommended Posts

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-04-29/unmasking-the-men-behind-zero-hedge-wall-street-s-renegade-blog

Colin Lokey, also known as "Tyler Durden," is breaking the first rule of Fight Club: You do not talk about Fight Club. He’s also breaking the second rule of Fight Club. (See the first rule.)

After more than a year writing for the financial website Zero Hedge under the nom de doom of the cult classic’s anarchic hero, Lokey’s going public. In doing so, he’s answering a question that has bedeviled Wall Street since the site sprang up seven years ago: Just who is Tyler Durden, anyway?

The answer, it turns out, is three people. Following an acrimonious departure this month, in which two-thirds of the trio traded allegations of hypocrisy and mental instability, Lokey, 32, decided to unmask himself and his fellow Durdens.

Lokey said the other two men are Daniel Ivandjiiski, 37, the Bulgarian-born former analyst long reputed to be behind the site, and Tim Backshall, 45, a well-known credit derivatives strategist. (Bloomberg LP competes with Zero Hedge in providing financial news and information.)

In a telephone interview, Ivandjiiski confirmed that the men had been the only Tyler Durdens on the payroll since Lokey came aboard last year, but he criticized his former colleague's decision to come forward.

He called Lokey's parting gift a case of sour grapes. Backshall, meanwhile, declined to comment, referring questions to Ivandjiiski. A political science graduate with an MBA and a Southern twang, Lokey said he had a checkered past before joining Zero Hedge. Earlier this month, overwork landed him in a hospital because he felt a panic attack coming on, he said.

“Ultimately we wish Colin all the best, he’s clearly a troubled individual in many ways, and we are frankly disappointed that he’s decided to take his displeasure with the company in such a public manner,” Ivandjiiski said.

The Schism

Ivandjiiski worked for a hedge fund before being barred by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in 2008 for insider trading. He didn’t admit or deny wrongdoing, the agency said. Backshall is a familiar face on financial news networks who has been quoted by media outlets, including Bloomberg. His involvement with Zero Hedge, along with that of Lokey, hasn’t been widely known.

The schism between the men sheds light on a website popular among market professionals, one that mixes detailed financial analysis with sensational headlines such as "The Coming War Will Solve Our Unemployment & Growth Problem" and "Exposed—How Two Janet Yellen Phone Calls Saved The World."

Since being founded in the depths of the financial crisis, Zero Hedge has grown from a blog to an Internet powerhouse. Often distrustful of the “establishment” and almost always bearish, it's known for a pessimistic world view. Posts entitled “Stocks Are In a Far More Precarious State Than Was Ever Truly Believed Possible” and “America's Entitled (And Doomed) Upper Middle Class” are not uncommon.

The site’s ethos is perhaps best summed up by the tagline at the top of its homepage, also borrowed from Fight Club: “On a long enough timeline the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.” A paean to populism, the 1999 film is filled with loathing for consumerism and the financial system. Brad Pitt portrays Tyler Durden as hell-bent on

of the global elite—an attitude often reflected in Zero Hedge’s content.

With that in mind, the website has argued that “pseudonymous speech” is necessary amid an atmosphere of stifled public dissent—hence the "Tyler Durden" alias was born. In earlier years, Durden was joined by "Marla Singer," another Fight Club character, as one of the site’s most prominent authors.

“It reminds me of a successful information operation where you mix in the propaganda stories along with other legitimate stories,” said Craig Pirrong, finance professor at the University of Houston. “There are some interesting things on it, and then there are the crazy things.”

Profit Motive

Despite holding itself out as a town crier for market angst, transcripts from Zero Hedge internal chat sessions provided by Lokey reveal a focus on Web traffic by the Durdens. Headlines are debated and a relentless publishing schedule maintained to keep readers sated. Lokey said the emphasis on profit—and what he considered political bias at the site—motivated him to quit.

He pointed to the wealth of the Durdens as a factor. Ivandjiiski has a multimillion-dollar mansion in Mahwah, N.J., and Backshall lives in a plush San Francisco suburb—not exactly reflections of Pitt's anticapitalist icon. “What you are reading at Zero Hedge is nonsense. And you shouldn’t support it,” Lokey wrote in an e-mail. “Two guys who live a lifestyle you only dream of are pretending to speak for you.”

Lokey adds: “Durden lives in a castle. If you’ve seen Fight Club, you know how ironic that is.”

A former “director of contributor success” at website Seeking Alpha, Lokey said he joined Zero Hedge for $6,000 a month and received an annual bonus of $50,000, earning more than $100,000 last year. His salary helped pay the rent on a “very nice” condominium on South Carolina’s Hilton Head Island, he said. Despite the compensation, he contends that he left because he disagreed with the site's editorial vision. “Reality checks are great. But Zero Hedge ceased to serve that public service years ago,” Lokey wrote. “They care what generates page views. Clicks. Money.”

Zero Hedge founder Ivandjiiski defended the site, adding that it's designed to be a for-profit entity. “Ultimately, the website makes money, and it’s profitable, which is also why we’ve never had to seek outside funding or any outside money—our only revenue is from advertising, always has been since day one,” he said. “Obviously, every publisher’s mission is to maximize revenue and page views, and we think that we do it in a way that is appropriate.”

Outside the Bubble

Any website's focus on traffic and revenue certainly isn't unusual. But Lokey said he was irked by what he saw as the hypocrisy of Zero Hedge and how it runs counter to its antiestablishment image. In the chat transcripts, Ivandjiiski refers to America's “silent majority” as “beastly,” while Backshall acknowledges life in the U.S. is bad “outside of my bubble.”

Ivandjiiski disagreed with the suggestion that personal worth or lifestyle precluded them from donning the mask of Durden (the character who quipped “the things you own end up owning you”) to deride the prevailing order. “We’ve never said that we are pro-socialist,” he said.

Lokey, who said he wrote much of the site’s political content, claimed there was pressure to frame issues in a way he felt was disingenuous. “I tried to inject as much truth as I could into my posts, but there’s no room for it. “Russia=good. Obama=idiot. Bashar al-Assad=benevolent leader. John Kerry= dunce. Vladimir Putin=greatest leader in the history of statecraft,” Lokey wrote, describing his take on the website's politics. Ivandjiiski countered that Lokey could write “anything and everything he wanted directly without anyone writing over it.”

Working at Zero Hedge was also exhausting, Lokey said, and typically involved early morning starts and writing as many as 15 posts a day of as many as 1,500 words each. The work didn’t stop on the weekends, either. Text messages exchanged between Lokey and Ivandjiiski, screen shots of which were provided by the latter, paint the picture of a work environment that ranged from exhilarating to exasperating.

For instance, Lokey says he's “scared to even ask for an hour off,” while Ivandjiiski replies that “if you ever need time off for whatever reason, never hesitate to just ask.” In February, Lokey says, “I love this company and this website,” and tells Ivandjiiski “you saved my life,” expressing thanks for the job.

By April 2—the day Lokey left Zero Hedge—their relationship had deteriorated significantly, according to the messages provided by Ivandjiiski.

“I can’t be a 24-hour cheerleader for Hezbollah, Moscow, Tehran, Beijing, and Trump anymore. It’ s wrong. Period. I know it gets you views now, but it will kill your brand over the long run,” Lokey texted Ivandjiiski. “This isn’t a revolution. It’s a joke.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ad hominem from start to finish. play the man not the ball.

the only thing this tells us where R.K's sentiments lie. And probably most here knew that already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They did well to keep it going for seven years, especially with the output is has had. Making shit up must be more difficult than just reporting the news.

as opposed to the msm that to a man was singing the praises of the economy in 2006/2007. Not to mention the ratings agencies that were doling out AAA to banks during the same period, as far as the eye could see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They did well to keep it going for seven years, especially with the output is has had. Making shit up must be more difficult than just reporting the news.

They've been virtually spot on in a great deal of what they've said for the last 7 years. What have you been reading?

Most of that Bloomberg article is just irrelevant nonsense.

As far as world view goes, who has been more correct - Zerohedge or the MSM? I'd go with Zerohedge, myself.

Edited by Errol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooh, the irony. :D

factual statement I posted.

the article expresses RKs sentiment, no ? otherwise why did he bother...

Edited by evetsm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They've been virtually spot on in a great deal of what they've said for the last 7 years. What have you been reading?

Most of that Bloomberg article is just irrelevant nonsense.

As far as world view goes, who has been more correct - Zerohedge or the MSM? I'd go with Zerohedge, myself.

Zero Hedge on the way to work, home, and at lunch. Other publications including Seeking Alpha, Econbrowser, Yahoo Finance, Bespoke, Interactive Investor, Hargreaves Lansdown, The Market Oracle, Elite Trader, the Motley Fool, Monevator and others that aren't bookmarked.

ZH has correctly predicted 1,000 of the last 2 recessions, I'll give it that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

factual statement I posted.

the article expresses RKs sentiment, no ? otherwise why did he bother...

Ad hominem is attacking the person's character rather than the argument. You did just that, didn't you :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad hominem is attacking the person's character rather than the argument. You did just that, didn't you :huh:

I'm not attacking his character, as the article did to the Tylers, I'm saying that his position is congruent with that article. That's a fact.

or did he post something he doesn't support ?

Edited by evetsm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not attacking his character, as the article did to the Tylers I'm staying that his position is congruent with that article. That's a fact.

or did he post something he doesn't support ?

I don't want to dwell on a minor point, you spoke of his character and didn't really address the content of the post except to say it's just like his character. Unless you're favourable of both I saw you attack him and not a single point of the article he posted.

Never mind, whatevs :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ad hominem from start to finish. play the man not the ball.

the only thing this tells us where R.K's sentiments lie. And probably most here knew that already.

I dont do smilies...but if I did.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zero Hedge on the way to work, home, and at lunch. Other publications including Seeking Alpha, Econbrowser, Yahoo Finance, Bespoke, Interactive Investor, Hargreaves Lansdown, The Market Oracle, Elite Trader, the Motley Fool, Monevator and others that aren't bookmarked.

ZH has correctly predicted 1,000 of the last 2 recessions, I'll give it that.

Which is a better record than that of the central bankers. ^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Full Story Behind Bloomberg's Attempt To "Unmask" Zero Hedge

Alas, as often happens, the reality is different from what is being presented in the mainstream media, as readers will shortly find out.

Below we will provide factual examples that corroborate that what Bloomberg's article is nothing more than a disgruntled employee seeking media attention in his attempt to "destroy" his former employer.

First, some insight into Colin's repeated alcohol abuse, the underlying reason for his what until recently were inexplicable to us mood swings, and sadly, the steady deterioration of his work product.

Conveniently Bloomberg ignored to add that its source was an alcoholic. It also ignored to add that its source had and still has deep psychological problems. In fact, as he himself admitted his problem is like "some physical sickness." It got so bad, he first resigned two months ago as a result of his most recent emotional collapse.

And then it was finally revealed the reason for his recurring mental problems: they were a remnant from his drug dealing days, a fact he presented to us for the first time just weeks ago.

Regarding, the actual content of Bloomberg's platform giving voice to a disturbed individual, former drug dealer and alcoholic, we find it particularly amusing as it "accuse" Zero Hedge of being intent on generating profits.

Coming from Bloomberg we find this not only entertaining but somewhat hypocritical.

Yes, Zero Hedge does and needs to generate a profit as nobody else would provide the funding needed to us, especially since our message is a simple one: the one the mainstream media will usually refuse to touch or discuss. We find it particularly amusing that Bloomberg quotes quotes Lokey as saying "he was irked by what he saw as the hypocrisy of Zero Hedge and how it runs counter to its antiestablishment image."

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-29/full-story-behind-bloombergs-attempt-unmask-zero-hedge

Edited by Errol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, absolutely Bloomberg will try to discredit any form of news not in keeping with the MSM. Whether that form of news is entirely accurate all of the time is neither here nor there, gotta keep on message with TPTB, eh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, absolutely Bloomberg will try to discredit any form of news not in keeping with the MSM. Whether that form of news is entirely accurate all of the time is neither here nor there, gotta keep on message with TPTB, eh.

As I see it, ZH must be doing something right if Michael Bloomberg's attack dogs feel the need to 'expose' them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I see it, ZH must be doing something right if Michael Bloomberg's attack dogs feel the need to 'expose' them.

Or something very wrong (not saying it is). Or just reporting financial news, like if Trump's campaign will benefit or hinder Brexit. Not really news but a way to fill column inches. Next up: how your cheese sofa will delay climate change. One mention of a very influential website which promotes anti-establishment ideals just means the establishment doesn't like it, doesn't mean it's telling the truth or not. I like it for its underlying premise but the articles are often ludicrous. Just my take, I might be wrong, would be glad to admit that but three guys in an office publishing so many exposes has to be part fabricated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You get more sense from Max Keiser than our state broadcasters, I find!

But fewer upvotes, which are the new currency once gold has been stolen by the FED and fiat currencies have all gone the way of the dodo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Next General Election   90 members have voted

    1. 1. When do you predict the next general election will be held?


      • 2019
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.