Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Btl Scum Regrouping And On The Offensive. -- Merged


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
4 hours ago, Bear Hug said:

I also quite liked this one:

This may not be the answer you are looking for, but my advice would be to squirrel as much of the rent away as possible. MX are completely inflexible, so inevitably, they will repossess and sell your houses, probably at larger losses REAL MARKET VALUE than is justifiable. You are going to have a huge debt on your hands be totally and utter f**ked and the best option is likely to be bankruptcy. Think long term and start putting STEALING the money away now. Sorry to be so blunt tell you the truth, but I don’t see another way out for you given what you have said. You are likely to BE ABLE TO STEAL FROM THEM get away with not paying the mortgages for 3 months before they start proceedings. All the best.

But isn't "squirreling away" just before going bankrupt effectively amounts to fraud?

Maybe a year in prison for theft/fraud might focus their minds, is dishing out advice like this also criminal ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444

Meanwhile, Ros has discovered the secret of how to get the attention of those self-important so-called "top guys" at the RLA, NLA etc:

Quote

I only got to have direct contact with the top guys after I told them stuff like it was me who suggested to Richard Dyson that he start the Telegraph campaign against s24, and that this was following the suggestion made to me by Professor Philip Booth of the Institute of Economic Affairs (blah blah) and by things like adding my ‘doctor’ title to emails that eventually I got through the ‘fire wall’. I don’t like all those silly games, dropping names and all that. But in some quarters that’s what works...

...BTW I think the subject of ‘why people don’t answer your emails’ would make a great little study

https://www.property118.com/tenants-must-now-say-section-24/93176/comment-page-2/#comment-85261

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
12 hours ago, GreenDevil said:

Last post is diamond. Haha you poor thing.

MX have been crystalising losses since 2008. They do not have a target to make profit. Their only target is to close out the mortgage book and ‘return’ the money to the taxpayer. I assume they have already written off a lot of debt as toxic anyway, so anything more than 10% of the debt repaid is a job well done. They do not act as a business in the traditional sense so don’t make rational decisions as a business would. They would not need to get a possession order in court as such. You will not get your day in court. They will instruct LPA’s, who they will say are your agent, then the LPA will sell the houses on your behalf at a huge loss, probably to one of their friends, who will make a tidy profit. This sounds extreme I know, but I am not a pessimist, just a realist. Just type in CAG Mortgage Express LPA Receiver into Google.

Of course, real banks never write down debt (read: crystallise their losses)

It's irrational, innit.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_writedowns_due_to_subprime_crisis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
12 minutes ago, mat109 said:

Of course, real banks never write down debt (read: crystallise their losses)

It's irrational, innit.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_writedowns_due_to_subprime_crisis

TBH if I was a bank who had taken the hit and written down the losses but the interest payments were still coming in on effectively written off loans id let them come in, take the revenue and handle the crystallization when it suits me. If she can afford to stay a debt slave forever and pay interest ill happily take her money forever, silly bint!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
3 hours ago, Dyson Fury said:

Meanwhile, Ros has discovered the secret of how to get the attention of those self-important so-called "top guys" at the RLA, NLA etc:

https://www.property118.com/tenants-must-now-say-section-24/93176/comment-page-2/#comment-85261

Doctor DEBTjunkie, M.D. at your service, I'll write you a letter I'll chop off your leg, just give me some more f*cking DEBT!!!!!

 

 

Edited by thewig
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
2 hours ago, Quicksilver said:

TBH if I was a bank who had taken the hit and written down the losses but the interest payments were still coming in on effectively written off loans id let them come in, take the revenue and handle the crystallization when it suits me. If she can afford to stay a debt slave forever and pay interest ill happily take her money forever, silly bint!

They do, or have been. If you pay the mortgage banks dont give fck, even for an IO mortgage. Thats tomorrows problem.

The problem is hat the money has not been coming in and so the debt is in default.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
5 hours ago, mat109 said:

Of course, real banks never write down debt (read: crystallise their losses)

It's irrational, innit.

The bank can be irrational long enough to make you insolvent!

(Nice illustration of the timescales in banking and real estate. It was 2008 when B&B's lenders finally wised-up and turned their nose up at this dogshit. When that funding disappeared the government took its place, via UKAR. UKAR ran down the mortgage book for eight years and only now are they seeking to sell-off what's left of the Mortgage Express loan book.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412

Somebody has posted a link to The Starfish Story to inspire his over-leveraged pals. I have some thoughts of my own on that matter.

The Section 24 Story

A young Conservative special adviser is walking around a Whitehall office and sees a desk piled high with hundreds and hundreds of tax returns from over-leveraged portfolio tw@ts. Between the towering piles of paperwork he sees a young civil servant testing the effectiveness of a proposed taxation change, picking up one file after another and stamping it "F**ked over by Section 24"

"Why are you trying to f**k over all these c**nts?," he asks.

"Because they are sociopathic, over-leveraged tw@ts and I'm tired of having to bid against the incremental addition to effective demand that they represent."

"But, young civil servant, don't you realise that there are hundreds of files on your desks representing hundreds of these daft c**ts! You can't possibly f**k over all of them. Some have low leverage and can sell up to reduce their gearing. Even if you get my boss to adopt your plan, you mightn't even f**k over a tenth of them. Your efforts won't make any difference at all."

The young civil servant listened calmly and then closed and stamped the file he was working on, just underneath where it gave the investor's name as Mr Dong. "I can f**k over this one."

Edited by Bland Unsight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
1 hour ago, Bland Unsight said:

Somebody has posted a link to The Starfish Story to inspire his over-leveraged pals. I have some thoughts of my own on that matter.

The Section 24 Story

A young Conservative special adviser is walking around a Whitehall office and sees a desk piled high with hundreds and hundreds of tax returns from over-leveraged portfolio tw@ts. Between the towering piles of paperwork he sees a young civil servant testing the effectiveness of a proposed taxation change, picking up one file after another and stamping it "F**ked over by Section 24"

"Why are you trying to f**k over all these c**nts?," he asks.

"Because they are sociopathic, over-leveraged tw@ts and I'm tired of having to bid against the incremental addition to effective demand that they represent."

"But, young civil servant, don't you realise that there are hundreds of files on your desks representing hundreds of these daft c**ts! You can't possibly f**k over all of them. Some have low leverage and can sell up to reduce their gearing. Even if you get my boss to adopt your plan, you mightn't even f**k over a tenth of them. Your efforts won't make any difference at all."

The young civil servant listened calmly and then closed and stamped the file he was working on, just underneath where it gave the investor's name as Mr Dong. "I can f**k over this one."

LOL... I just fell off the chair.

Another one, thinks everything will be fine.

https://www.property118.com/can-pull-rug-fast/93302/#comment-85335

It’s my only rental and I take good care about my 6 tenants . This company has us all worried now over Xmas that the new year will bring 2 people homeless and myself unable to refinance to save my business .
All because they are denying the previous company’s agreement with me .

No.. you f***ing twit, the mortgage company is not making 2 people homeless. It's your ignorance and incompetence that did. For f***sake don't shed crocodile tears for the tenants, you are worried about your income "It's my only rental".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
47 minutes ago, hi5lo5 said:

LOL... I just fell off the chair.

Another one, thinks everything will be fine.

https://www.property118.com/can-pull-rug-fast/93302/#comment-85335

It’s my only rental and I take good care about my 6 tenants . This company has us all worried now over Xmas that the new year will bring 2 people homeless and myself unable to refinance to save my business .
All because they are denying the previous company’s agreement with me .

No.. you f***ing twit, the mortgage company is not making 2 people homeless. It's your ignorance and incompetence that did. For f***sake don't shed crocodile tears for the tenants, you are worried about your income "It's my only rental".

On a bright side, the remaining 4 "free range" tenants will have a bit more living space between them.  I bet the space is probably only big enough for 2 or 3 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
23 minutes ago, Clarky Cat said:

Quite likely it was a 3 bed terrace. Split the master bedroom in 2,  dining room and lounge bedrooms, kitchen becomes the "shared living space"

Rife in the local BTL hotspots

I love the fact the letter giving approval has been "destroyed".... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
23 hours ago, Quicksilver said:

TBH if I was a bank who had taken the hit and written down the losses but the interest payments were still coming in on effectively written off loans id let them come in, take the revenue and handle the crystallization when it suits me. If she can afford to stay a debt slave forever and pay interest ill happily take her money forever, silly bint!

That is effectively what they have been doing and getting rid of the riskiest stuff first e.g. where people are behind with payments and where the interest isn't coming in, where the current value is less than what they can recover or larger portfolios where the total risk is high if it goes wrong (and there is also some scale benefit to the costs of sorting a bigger portfolio rather than small one.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
12 hours ago, Clarky Cat said:

Quite likely it was a 3 bed terrace. Split the master bedroom in 2,  dining room and lounge bedrooms, kitchen becomes the "shared living space"

Rife in the local BTL hotspots

But for the lender with Basel 3 etc. the rental income has to match perfectly for risk model valuation purposes just in case the local authority decides 3 bed means 3 bed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420

David Price 118 11:20 21/12/16

"When all the landlords are gone, when all the Council stock is sold, when all the shop doorways are occupied, when children die on the streets this &()%^$*&^ government will still blame ex landlords for the housing crisis. 

I have never seen an organisation take so many unnecessary actions against the only sector trying to alleviate the situation."

Summarises in one breath how far away some of these guys are from the view of the general public, non leveraged landlords, never mind HPC. 

They believe without them the world stops spinning, they believe they are providing a service to the poor and keeping people out of the workhouses. Without the BTL explosion babies will die in the street. 

There is no appreciation of the impact they have had, the tone of the legislation or the purpose of it. They assume the government does not understand what it is doing.

These guys just think it's an unintended consequence. No appreciation of the bigger picture at all. If this were chess they are only seeing the next move (and probably even that one wrongly)....they need to see the next 7 moves and the end game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422
1 hour ago, Phil321 said:

They believe without them the world stops spinning, they believe they are providing a service to the poor and keeping people out of the workhouses. Without the BTL explosion babies will die in the street. 

Nurse: "Doctor, doctor! Isn't there anything we can do to save these poor children?"

Doctor: "There's just one thing left to try. It's crazy but it might work. Get me twenty or thirty unspeakable c**ts and a give them each a couple of million pounds of interest-only mortgages!

Nurse: [Puzzled] "Then what?"

Doctor: "Tell them to pay too much for shit houses."

Nurse: [Visibly swooning] "You're a genius, I tell you - a genius"

 

Edited by Bland Unsight
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424
2 hours ago, Phil321 said:

David Price 118 11:20 21/12/16

"When all the landlords are gone, when all the Council stock is sold, when all the shop doorways are occupied, when children die on the streets this &()%^$*&^ government will still blame ex landlords for the housing crisis. 

I have never seen an organisation take so many unnecessary actions against the only sector trying to alleviate the situation."

 

 

F**K are these people insane ?

#StillLaughing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information