Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
fru-gal

Uk Banking Sector ‘Extremely Vulnerable’ To Financial Crisis, Report Warns

Recommended Posts

Well the government should do something otherwise house prices might drop because of those pesky bankers on their iPhones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let there be a crisis and let it bring down house prices by 50% at least to have some sanity and life outside housing and mortgage debts.

Edited by Fairyland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/entry/financial-system-resilience-index

Our Financial System Resilience Index, based on insights from complexity science, reveals that the UK’s resilience declined dramatically in the 2000s to levels far below those of other leading industrial economies. Despite some marginal improvements since the crisis of 2008, without major structural changes our financial system remains at risk of future crisis.

The 2008 crisis underlined a series of weaknesses in the global financial system. Efforts to redesign and regulate the system must focus on ensuring resilience – the system’s ability to continue to serve the economy well in the face of shocks that unfold suddenly from within, as in 2008, and also gradually emerging strains on the system, such as climate change.

While policymakers and regulators do talk about resilience, it is not always clear what they mean. Often it is implicitly assumed that, by making individual banks hold more capital, we can stop them from ever going bust – ‘resilient’ banks will equal a resilient system. This is a dangerous assumption; it also ignores our growing understanding that complex systems are about much more than the sum of their individual parts.
Drawing on academic and policy literature and a series of expert interviews and roundtables, we find seven key factors that influence system resilience and that can be measured:

  1. Diversity – healthy systems have a diversity of actors who occupy a variety of different niches in the system and employ different strategies to thrive.
  2. Interconnectedness and network structure – the way financial institutions are connected to each other affects the way a crisis spreads.
  3. Financial system size – financial systems that are large relative to their domestic economy pose a greater threat to economic stability.
  4. Asset composition – where banks invest matters, with some types of financial assets particularly prone to boom and bust.
  5. Liability composition – the way banks are funded also matters: short-term borrowing from other banks are more fickle and volatile than customer deposits.
  6. Complexity and transparency – the growing complexity associated with securitisation and the ‘slicing and dicing’ of loans can spread risks around the financial
  7. Leverage - the ratio between banks’ assets and their capital; this has been a key focus of post-crisis financial regulation.

Comparing national financial system resilience

We compiled numerical indicators for each of these factors to compare different countries’ financial systems, and whether they had become more or less resilient over time. This analysis finds that the UK economy has low levels of financial system resilience, significantly trailing other leading industrial economies, including Japan, Germany, France, Italy, and Canada.

Although the UK’s financial system resilience has improved slightly since the financial crisis, it remains the worst in terms of diversity, interconnectedness, financial system size, asset composition and complexity, and transparency. This has worrying implications for the UK’s economic stability.

Since the financial crisis, governments have focused on increasing competition between commercial banks and requiring banks to hold more capital. Our analysis finds that these may have limited effects on overall financial system resilience. Specific policy implications of the analysis include:

  • Competition policy must promote diversity, not simply more ‘lookalike’ challenger banks.
  • Policymakers cannot rely on complex new capital requirements to ensure system resilience: structural reforms, such as separating retail from investment banking, could be more effective.
  • The rise of peer-to-peer lending could significantly improve system resilience, but this depends on how the industry evolves.
  • A better knowledge of systems theory sheds light on vital characteristics of financial systems not currently reflected in policy, such as diversity, network structure, and the overall composition of banks’ lending.

We recommend that regulatory bodies:

  • explicitly define system resilience.
  • measure and publish resilience indicators.
  • apply multicriteria analysis to policy-making, including resilience indicators as criteria.
  • assess the resilience of the system as a separate and distinct exercise from assessing the resilience of individual financial institutions.
  • conduct further research on the impact of different network structures on financial systems performance and resilience.

It is vital that policymakers develop a more sophisticated understanding of resilience and use it to help reshape our financial system. Unless this is achieved, our economy and society remain at risk of a future financial crisis.

Stop the fire sale of RBS

Chancellor's plans to sell off publicly owned bank will cost taxpayers £13bn

Watch: why we need to break up RBS

NEF's Josh Ryan-Collins on Russia Today

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I`ve got enough money to see myself though to retirement in only 10 years time (council dweller innit)

According to Max Keiser and RT I should tell the banks where to go and put my money (£50k) into Bit coin and Bit coin capital etc. etc. etc.

Maybe I`ll do just that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As soon as I saw it was by RT I thought....meh.

But on reading it, this section struck a chord....(bold highlights mine)

Essentially we have a banking system that is not fit for purpose unless you consider its sole purpose is to 'get credit into the economy' by pumping up the cost of houses.

nothing we don't know already, is it.

initially, who will face the greater shock, when oil prices come to a complete standstill and there is no way of plying your trade elsewhere??

...that's the mercantilists..

doesn't mean we can rest on our laurels for one bit, because there is a bit of truth in the story...they can't export much for the first couple of years because of external factors.

doesn't mean they can't make stuff.

long term, it's the designers and producers that will win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seven years to fix the system and it is still not fixed. It's as if the bankers know they will be bailed out if the banks go belly up.

I guess a start point would be to look and see what caused the problems in 2007 ... oh that would be high house prices and out of control lending and our PM sees his failure being that in some areas (not London and SE) prices are below 2007 levels and he wishes he had introduced HtB earlier.

he and Osborne need to go to jail for fraud, IMHO. What they have done, in the name of helping people, is not just disgusting it should be illegal. the pm and his money mam cannot be above the law. Edited by TheCountOfNowhere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seven years to fix the system and it is still not fixed. It's as if the bankers know they will be bailed out if the banks go belly up.

I guess a start point would be to look and see what caused the problems in 2007 ... oh that would be high house prices and out of control lending and our PM sees his failure being that in some areas (not London and SE) prices are below 2007 levels and he wishes he had introduced HtB earlier.

..all house have financial scaffolding holding up their prices to keep borrowers and lenders 'heads above water'...how many people in Germany have mortgages compared to the UK...?...they live in a parallel universe compared to us ...nobody supported us financially after the war ..except for loans which we have now repaid ... :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does RT have anything to say about the Russian banking system?

No? Thought not..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As soon as I saw it was by RT I thought....meh.

But on reading it, this section struck a chord....(bold highlights mine)

Essentially we have a banking system that is not fit for purpose unless you consider its sole purpose is to 'get credit into the economy' by pumping up the cost of houses.

That was the purpose a few years ago, but that model stopped working a while back, we are just treading water now with massive PTB intervention and deflation clawing at the door like some B-movie beast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Next General Election   95 members have voted

    1. 1. When do you predict the next general election will be held?


      • 2019
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.