Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

happy_renting

The Bbc And The 28 Missing Pages

Recommended Posts

After 9/11, the US Government launched an enquiry into the activities of it's Intelligence agencies before and after the attack.

The joint inquiry was a collaborative undertaking of the House and Senate intelligence committees.

The offical report, the 'Joint Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001' (not the 9/11 Commission Report) was published in December 2002.

28 Pages of the report, an entire section, were redacted on the orders of George W Bush. The Bushes have close relationships with the Saudi Royal family and the bin Ladens. The pages remain secret. Obama had promised to publish them, but has failed to do so.

Some US Congressmen & Senators have obtained permission to read the 28 pages. They cannot disclose the precise details, but have revealed that the report implicates Saudi nationals, and possibly the Saudi government, in financing the 9/11 attack.

For years there has been a campaign to publish the details, most recently with Rand Paul attempting to introduce legislation this week to force publication.

Of couse, the USA and UK went to war with Iraq, partly on the pretext that Iraq, not Saudi Arabia, was the culprit for 9/11.

So you would think there would be some interest from the BBC on the matter of these secret pages.

But using BBC news website's search tool, and also Googling BBC in relation to the matter, shows up only a couple of BBC reports back in 2002-3. I can find no recent mention of the matter on the BBC website.

Can anyone find any recent BBC reports covering the subject of the 28 pages? And if not, why not?

Perhaps I am being over suspicious, and not using the best search terms. But this seems odd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been any actual news on the topic? If not, then no news to report. And as Bloo Loo suggests - most news is really recycled press releases nowadays. There simply isn't the cash or the will to do much investigative reporting nowadays - certainly not from the BBC. Any inclination to do so was buried with the dodgy dossier.

Look to the Telegraph (MP expenses scandal) or Guardian (Snowdon) for that kind of stuff - and even there it seems there's not as much as there used to be. Few would touch a subject like this after seeing what was done to the BBC. No they are more interested the crap Prince Charles used to send to Prime Ministers on his pet subjects.

That said, the Guardian has covered the story:

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/02/rand-paul-urges-obama-to-declassify-28-pages-of-the-911-report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of points

The rest of the report does a pretty good job of implicating Saudi nationals, even without the redacted 28 pages. Plus a couple of congressmen have mentioned that those pages refer to countries, not just a single country. So more than just Saudi is in the frame.

I've posted this before but Congressman Massie's comments about the 28 pages indicate that their contents gave him cause to completely 'rearrange his understanding of history' and to 'rethink everything'...

I'm also reminded of the line in the 9/11 Commission report which went...

To date, the U.S. government has not been able to determine the origin of the money used for the 9/11 attacks. Ultimately the question is of little practical significance...

Really?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has there been any actual news on the topic? If not, then no news to report. And as Bloo Loo suggests - most news is really recycled press releases nowadays. There simply isn't the cash or the will to do much investigative reporting nowadays - certainly not from the BBC. Any inclination to do so was buried with the dodgy dossier.

Look to the Telegraph (MP expenses scandal) or Guardian (Snowdon) for that kind of stuff - and even there it seems there's not as much as there used to be. Few would touch a subject like this after seeing what was done to the BBC. No they are more interested the crap Prince Charles used to send to Prime Ministers on his pet subjects.

As I said, Rand Paul has been raising the matter in the House of Representatives this week - he introduced a new Bill yesterday.

The BBC has been reporting this week about Rand Paul with respect to the NSA and the Patriot Act, and even have a profile on him today.

But the 28 pages? On the BBC website, nada. Zilch.

Reminds me of when the UK government crawled to the Saudis in the 1980's over the film Death of a Princess. The UK Establishment seems to be in the Saudi's grip. Why? Just to protect our exports?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Able Bravo intelligence group was tracking Al Quaeda WELL BEFORE 911. Their intelligence reports were ignored...

Go to the page, and search for "intelligence", and be stunned at the number of top personnel who think it's a crock of sh1t

http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, U.S. Army Reserve (ret) – Former Chief of the Army’s Controlled HUMINT (Human Intelligence) Program, overseeing Army Intelligence and Security Command’s global controlled HUMINT efforts. A former member of the Able Danger data mining program that targeted Al Qaeda’s global structure. Former Commander of Special Troops Battalion, 9th Theater Support Command. Awarded the Bronze Star for bravery. Fellow, Center for Advanced Defense Studies. 23-year military intelligence career.

  • Personal endorsement of a New Investigation into 9/11 as described in the New York City Ballot Initiative:

    "I endorse the NYC CAN campaign and support the need for a new, independent, investigation of the events and failures that lead up to the 9/11 attacks.

    The original 9/11 Commission inquiry became an exercise in bureaucratic ass-covering and obfuscation of accountability.

    I had no intention of joining the ranks of “whistle blowers”. In 2003, when I made my disclosure to the 9/11 commission regarding the existence of a pre 9/11 offensive counter-terrorism operation that had discovered several of the 9/11 terrorists a full year before the 9/11 attacks my intention was to simply tell the truth, and fulfill my oath of office.

Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, U.S. Navy – Former head of the Able Danger data mining program that targeted Al Qaeda’s global structure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps it's 28 pages that state the US/cia funded the attack?

Impo even at their most potentially dramatic, they're likely to be no more than a few more layers peeled off a fair sized onion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

28 pages later - The End! :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 28 pages will implicate the Saudi royals when the US decide

they need an excuse to invade them.

I would say who the real perpetrators of 911 are but Cameron

warned me that if I carry on spreading malicous conspiracy theories

he would eradicate me by all means at his Govts disposal.

Scary isnt it, questioning Govt versions of terror acts is as bad as

being an ISIS terrorist, apparently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They would threaten isis, but isis aren't listening, so they threaten the only people who are.... You!

Welcome to the brave new world comrade. The only saving grace is, it will be a whole lot worse in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 28 pages will implicate the Saudi royals when the US decide

they need an excuse to invade them.

I would say who the real perpetrators of 911 are but Cameron

warned me that if I carry on spreading malicous conspiracy theories

he would eradicate me by all means at his Govts disposal.

Scary isnt it, questioning Govt versions of terror acts is as bad as

being an ISIS terrorist, apparently.

The National Socialists are truly taking over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The National Socialists are truly taking over.

Please see me in Berlin, before I go mad and declare a thousand year Reich which lasts only 12.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Next General Election   91 members have voted

    1. 1. When do you predict the next general election will be held?


      • 2019
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.