Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
darwin

90,000 New Yorkers Apply To Live In 55 Affordable Housing Units

Recommended Posts

Gawker.com - 90,000 New Yorkers Apply to Live In Poor Door High-Rise

London's bad but that's a crazy number.

When it was announced last July that NYC’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development approved a high-rise building with separate entrances for low-income and wealthy tenants, outrage dutifully followed. But now that applications for the building are open, the city’s housing problem appears to be worse than we thought.

The New York Times has an update on the famed Upper West Side high-rise, whose application window for the 55 affordable housing units closed Monday. The 55 apartments—whose tenants will not have access to the pool, gym, bowling alley, or private theater, and who will be treated like second-class citizens in their own city by being shuttled through a separate door in a “back alley”—received almost 90,000 applications. Non-rich people in New York are so desperate for affordable housing that they will seek it in any way that they can imagine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You missed this part:

"The units at Extell’s building are eligible to households with incomes of $30,240 to $50,340, with rents listed at $1,082 for a two-bedroom, $895 for a one-bedroom and $833 for a studio in a prime location by the Hudson River."

As I understand it, that's basically a home for life at that low, low rent, under NYC's rent control laws.

It's also right on the river, and under a mile from Central Park, in Manhattan.

So basically the equivalent of a two-bed flat on the Strand in London for £700/month, for the rest of your life. It's an asset worth maybe a million dollars, and it had massive publicity, of course it would get lots of applicants. Free money, basically.

Edited by bambam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's still crazy, because it's an arbitrary gift to a few lucky people. At least the priority seems to be people in work, though, rather than unemployed single mothers.

Better give social housing to Pret a Manger Poles, than the chavs who refused to do the work before them (although perhaps the system will turn the hungry young Poles into chavs in a generation or so).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   34 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.