Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Uk Nuclear Strategy Faces Meltdown As Faults Are Found In Identical French Project


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
On 29/04/2015 at 5:26 PM, Nationalist said:

And let's not forget they were promised £92 per megawatt hour generated, compared to the current wholesale price of £50.

(In fact the frogs don't need to build a power station, they could just buy electricity in at £50 and sell it back out at £92 - provided no-one noticed.)

Gidiot really was Brown idiot younger brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442
1 minute ago, spyguy said:

Put it on a rickerpt and send it to the Moon. Seriously.

Or drop it down the Marianna trench.

 

Whats the cost of putting a Kg into LEO (let alone to the Moon) - $10,000. Multiple by 3 to account for casing.

Thats at least $36bn just to get the HL waste into LEO. God help us if the rocket explodes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
5 minutes ago, Riedquat said:

Less isn't none, and very slowly moving areas of high pressure in winter are fairly common. The worry is that enough backup won't be kept to deal with those; that backup would be completely uneconomical to build and maintain.

For a singular turbine or farm yes. If you start looking at turbines spread out from Cornwall to Scotland, to the middle of the North Sea, Irish Sea, Channel and Celtic Sea the back up requirement diminishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445
3 minutes ago, Kurt Barlow said:

Look on the bright side - if that happens you will have more to worry about than the 'visual blight' of a wind turbine

 

5 minutes ago, Kurt Barlow said:

Whats the cost of putting a Kg into LEO (let alone to the Moon) - $10,000. Multiple by 3 to account for casing.

Thats at least $36bn just to get the HL waste into LEO. God help us if the rocket explodes.

Dont know.

Isnt that cost gor humans.

Remove the need to sustain life and it would be cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
16 minutes ago, Kurt Barlow said:

For a singular turbine or farm yes. If you start looking at turbines spread out from Cornwall to Scotland, to the middle of the North Sea, Irish Sea, Channel and Celtic Sea the back up requirement diminishes.

Diminishes but not vanishes, and there's always a non-zero chance of them all being affected. If that chance is sufficiently remote so be it (I'm not one of those "any chance is too much risk!" types - there's a chance of enough existing plants failing unexpectedly after all). There's still some requirement for otherwise uneconomic backup though, and in this day and age where things are (often wrongly) regarded as wasteful if they're not being used every second of every day that's a hard sell.

 

15 minutes ago, spyguy said:

 

Dont know.

Isnt that cost gor humans.

Remove the need to sustain life and it would be cheaper.

Having humans on board and their life support on board adds to the weight but probably not much to the cost per unit weight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
22 minutes ago, Kurt Barlow said:

For a singular turbine or farm yes. If you start looking at turbines spread out from Cornwall to Scotland, to the middle of the North Sea, Irish Sea, Channel and Celtic Sea the back up requirement diminishes.

If we start adding to windy mills, thrn wed be extending the grid out to the sea, sinking the cost, do tidal power could be cheaply added later.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
Just now, Riedquat said:

Diminishes but not vanishes, and there's always a non-zero chance of them all being affected. If that chance is sufficiently remote so be it (I'm not one of those "any chance is too much risk!" types - there's a chance of enough existing plants failing unexpectedly after all). There's still some requirement for otherwise uneconomic backup though, and in this day and age where things are (often wrongly) regarded as wasteful if they're not being used every second of every day that's a hard sell.

 

Having humans on board and their life support on board adds to the weight but probably not much to the cost per unit weight.

More likely a design fault found in our new fleet of French /  Chinese nukes and all get shut down / severely curtailed output while a solution is found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
Just now, spyguy said:

If we start adding to windy mills, thrn wed be extending the grid out to the sea, sinking the cost, do tidal power could be cheaply added later.

 

Offshore wind could work very well with a viable form of wave power. The turbine tower could double as an anchor point for the wave power device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
6 minutes ago, Kurt Barlow said:

More likely a design fault found in our new fleet of French /  Chinese nukes and all get shut down / severely curtailed output while a solution is found.

You could centre office/fixed platforms nearby.

Theyd not be fun in Winter but are doable for a 3 day stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information