Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
koala_bear

Australia Plans Fees For Foreign Property Investors

Recommended Posts

Oz wakes up but can't see this happening in the UK (London) :(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-31615314
Australia plans fees for foreign property investors

Foreign investors may have to pay large fees before buying Australian residential real estate or businesses, the government has announced.

PM Tony Abbott said the government was proposing a range of civil penalties and fees linked to foreign investment.

Property prices are a hot button issue in Australia, especially in Sydney, and there are claims foreign investment is artificially boosting house prices.

.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Won't make much difference, just headlines. Properties will be bought through australian based relatives or agents, with true ownership held in a drawer in a lawyers office in Shanghai. And how do they propose to apply it to properties owned by companies or trusts? Unless they are willing to have a specialised investigation unit to chase evaders, never going to make a difference.

Not only that, have a guess at how many foreign property purchases were turned down by the FIRB in 2013?

None

Zero

Zip

and that is the current government body for protecting Australia from foreign ownership of critical land and assets.

The only way to do this is harsh penalties for evasion with seizure of the whole asset if proven. They won't do that, so move along, nothing to see here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How long until the "Waves of cash rich foreign buyers pushing up prices!" stories are replaced with "There aren't actually very many unleveraged foreign buyers, so prices will just keep rising anyway!" stories?

Where's a fella to go with his CHF mortgage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

February 25, 2015 1:14 pm
Surge in Chinese housebuying spurs global backlash

Jamil Anderlini in Beijing

Prospective buyers wait in line to inspect a house for sale in the suburb of Eastwood in Sydney, Australia, on Saturday, Jan. 11, 2014. Purchases by locally resident Chinese and those from mainland China are inflating housing bubbles in and around Sydney, where prices in some suburbs have surged as much as 27 percent in the past year.

Australia plans to impose a new tax on foreign property buyers after Chinese investment in Australian real estate soared 60 per cent last year, in the latest sign of a gathering international backlash against wealthy Chinese property investors.

The move, which came after locals complained about being priced out of the housing market, follows the introduction of similar, more punitive, taxes in Hong Kong and Singapore aimed primarily at discouraging the flood of mainland Chinese money into those markets. Governments in all three locations say that the new taxes are not directed at any single nationality.

In the past year, mainland Chinese buyers have become the biggest single group of foreign investors in residential property in the US, UK and Australia, as well as in key cities in other western countries, according to real estate brokers.

In the year to March 2014, mainland Chinese buyers accounted for nearly a quarter of all foreign purchasers of residential real estate in the US, spending about $22bn, compared with $12.8bn a year earlier, according to the US National Association of Realtors. Canadians, the second biggest group, spent $13.8bn in the same period.

Most apartments being built by Chinese developers in prime markets such as New York, London and Sydney are also being sold directly to mainland Chinese buyers.

The UK, Australia, Canada and the US are the most popular destinations for Chinese real estate investment. Australia had the strongest growth in inbound real estate investment from China in 2014, with an increase of more than 60 per cent, according to estimates from property consultancy Knight Frank, based on official Australian data.

In London, Chinese buyers accounted for 11 per cent of all property transactions above £1m in 2014, up from 4 per cent in 2012, according to Knight Frank. The comparable figure for Russian buyers, the second-largest group, was 5 per cent — a proportion that has hardly changed for several years.

Total value of investment in overseas real estate by Chinese institutional investors has also ballooned from $600m in 2009 to about $15bn last year, according to Knight Frank estimates.

Jin Guo, head of Asia at Cordea Savills, a real estate investor, says: “It is actually very difficult to properly trace volumes of individual Chinese property purchases abroad since most people do not register with any government agency and they get their money out of China using informal channels.

“But . . . we have seen estimates from the US, Australia and UK showing 20-30 per cent of foreign buyers are from China.”

Analysts say the rush of Chinese money into western property markets is the result of a complex combination of factors.

The enormous overcapacity and recent slowdown in China’s domestic property market has pushed many wealthy people to diversify their investments into offshore assets.

This has been made easier and more attractive by the collapse in property prices in many western markets that followed the 2008 financial crisis and the huge rise in Chinese prices over the past decade.

“The domestic Chinese market is very unstable, full of bubbles and depends on government policy,” says Cathy Zhang, senior sales consultant at Ausunland Group.

Prices for prime residential real estate in cities such as Los Angeles and Miami are roughly 25 per cent lower than in Shanghai.

Government restrictions, worsening pollution and decrepit health and social services have also led many Chinese to buy property in more developed countries they may wish to eventually emigrate to. Add to that the anxiety generated by the anti-corruption campaign launched by President Xi Jinping two years ago.

$15bn

Total value of investment in overseas real estate by Chinese institutional investors

Although few in the industry will openly discuss it, some acknowledge privately that fear among Chinese officials and businesspeople has been a big factor in the surge of investment into western real estate. The Chinese government has stepped up efforts to repatriate corrupt officials and recover offshore assets, including luxury foreign properties.

“The ongoing purge and the fear of losing everything if you are caught up in an anti-corruption investigation or a political fight has convinced many in China to diversify to places with clear and stable legal and political environments,” says one figure at a large property advisory company.

Capital controls restrict Chinese residents from exchanging more than $50,000 in foreign currency each year, which would make it almost impossible for a Chinese person to buy a prime residential property abroad.

This means effectively that all property purchases by Chinese nationals overseas are technically illegal.

Questions over the provenance of much of the Chinese money streaming into cities such as New York, London and Sydney will also add to growing resentment among locals who feel they are being priced out of the market.

Analysts expect the backlash to spread as Chinese investment continues to rise and politicians face increasing pressure to act.

The Australian government has proposed “application fees” of A$10,000 (US$7,800) for every A$1m that foreign buyers spend on Australian property.

It has also pledged to enforce an existing law that prohibits non-residents from buying existing — rather than newly built — housing. Offenders could be fined up to 25 per cent of the value of the property and forced to sell it.

The UK government has made a series of tax changes in the past three years aimed at discouraging wealthy foreign buyers from the London housing market. The crackdown focused particularly on homes bought using offshore companies, which make it hard to trace a property’s ownership.

Additional reporting by Gu Yu

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fcc2d346-bcd3-11e4-9902-00144feab7de.html?siteedition=uk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the front page of the daily mail for taxpayer sympathy? It's nearly all bo11ox. As this is about Oz here's a good one for a reality check:

Negative population growth and just as big a housing boom as everywhere else

The headline should read housing boom leads to negative population growth because no one can afford to have children

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The headline should read housing boom leads to negative population growth because no one can afford to have children

Possibly, but I think in a world where $3m has been raised for a byron-bay beehive the scale of issues and what's going on might even be a bit bigger than that: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/flow-hive-honey-on-tap-directly-from-your-beehive

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In London, Chinese buyers accounted for 11 per cent of all property transactions above £1m in 2014, up from 4 per cent in 2012, according to Knight Frank. The comparable figure for Russian buyers, the second-largest group, was 5 per cent — a proportion that has hardly changed for several years.

Total value of investment in overseas real estate by Chinese institutional investors has also ballooned from $600m in 2009 to about $15bn last year, according to Knight Frank estimates.

:)

Can't wait till this POPs big time. A big bust after a massive boom. Lovely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd imagine the Oz establishment is much the same as the UK establishment.

100%, they do not want to stop the flow of stolen money into Aus housing 'bitcoins'. Too many well connected VI's to pay off. Tax is going to be a pathetic $5000 for sales of up to $1mill and thats an average figure for these buyers.

The headline should read housing boom leads to negative population growth because no one can afford to have children

Dont worry the massively freed up 457 immigration visas will take care of that. Locals can just f&*&K off and die as far as Aus govt is concerned, a bunch of traitors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   211 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.