Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

R K

If You Look At Porn You Are A Jihadist Says Totalitarian Nutter

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-31056823

Boris Johnson has described men who join religious extremist groups such as Islamic State as "losers" who are likely to be users of pornography.

The Mayor of London told The Sun those turning to violence had low self-esteem and were unsuccessful with women.

The Tory politician cited an MI5 report into extremism that had compiled psychological profiles of jihadists.

Chancellor George Osborne said the mayor was "right not to be nice about these people".

According to the newspaper, Mr Johnson said: "If you look at all the psychological profiling about bombers, they typically will look at porn.

"They are tortured. They will be very badly adjusted in their relations with women, and that is a symptom of their feeling of being failures and that the world is against them.

"They are not making it with girls and so they turn to other forms of spiritual comfort - which of course is no comfort.

"They are just young men in desperate need of self-esteem who do not have a particular mission in life, who feel that they are losers and this thing makes them feel strong - like winners."

Mr Johnson said he believed Muslim communities should lead efforts to tackle extremism, but claimed clerics had not been "persuasive in the right way with these people".

Mr Osborne, speaking on a visit to Portsmouth, said the mayor was known for his "colourful language" but agreed with the sentiment of the remarks.

So nearly all men are jihadist losers who hate women say johnson/Osborne

You can only guess were Johnson/osborne are going with this.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I confess. When I was a teenager I looked at porn and wished I was more successful with women. Where do I turn myself in?

I also have a desire to grow a beard. But my wife won't let me. Oppressor!

Anyway, talking of terror-phobia, did anyone see the reports of the police handing out "how to spot a terrorist" leaflets at rail stations this week? Clues to look for include "does someone have more than one mobile phone?", "do they have vague travel plans?", etc. Of course, you're then instructed to pass on their details.

Can someone knock up a "how to spot a police state" leaflet, please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway, talking of terror-phobia, did anyone see the reports of the police handing out "how to spot a terrorist" leaflets at rail stations this week? Clues to look for include "does someone have more than one mobile phone?", "do they have vague travel plans?", etc. Of course, you're then instructed to pass on their details.

Loads of them, seem to scurry back to base from time to time ...

estate-agent-sale-boards6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The University of Montreal had to cancel a study into womens impressions of young men that watched porn v young men that didn't.

They couldn't find any guys that had never watched porn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Faulty reasoning I think OP and not how profiling works.

Most eeps are meeps but only some meeps are eeps :)

Jingoistic but interesting development I think to put this kind of thing in the news.

P

Since it is well documented that nearly all young men (and lots of women) watch porn (as I said) then linking jihadists to watching porn is the fallacy of composition.

i.e. It is Johnson who is making the wrong inference.

Question is - why and why is Osborne supporting him?

he could just as well have said profiling concludes that all jihadists eat food. But perhaps hes not planning on banning food, wereas govt have recently forced ISPs to implement porn (and other) site filters.

he clearly has a security (totalitarian) related agenda.

(obviously I turned it around to point out the absurdity and danger of his assertion)

Johnson does this frequently. he made a claim that all his rich friends are very clever and hard working, which is exactly the same failure. So either hes really stupid or likes to wilfully mislead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I confess. When I was a teenager I looked at porn and wished I was more successful with women. Where do I turn myself in?

I also have a desire to grow a beard. But my wife won't let me. Oppressor!

Anyway, talking of terror-phobia, did anyone see the reports of the police handing out "how to spot a terrorist" leaflets at rail stations this week? Clues to look for include "does someone have more than one mobile phone?", "do they have vague travel plans?", etc. Of course, you're then instructed to pass on their details.

Can someone knock up a "how to spot a police state" leaflet, please?

Well, my wife has 2 phones, and her travel plans are often flaky... OH MY GOD SHE'S A TERRORIST!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since it is well documented that nearly all young men (and lots of women) watch porn (as I said) then linking jihadists to watching porn is the fallacy of composition.

i.e. It is Johnson who is making the wrong inference.

Question is - why and why is Osborne supporting him?

he could just as well have said profiling concludes that all jihadists eat food. But perhaps hes not planning on banning food, wereas govt have recently forced ISPs to implement porn (and other) site filters.

he clearly has a security (totalitarian) related agenda.

(obviously I turned it around to point out the absurdity and danger of his assertion)

Johnson does this frequently. he made a claim that all his rich friends are very clever and hard working, which is exactly the same failure. So either hes really stupid or likes to wilfully mislead.

I presume he means that they cannot attract women to sleep with them, they are a bit like that guy who shot a bunch of women in santa barbara last year...

i suspect there is a germ of truth in the idea that the way islam is practised in this country and elsewhere a lot of young muslim men have no idea how to empathise with the opposite sex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assumed that Boris was just trying to embarrass anyone thinking of joining ISIL...."You're only joining cos you can't get a girlfriend"

Anyway, in order to become a terrorist you have to have a small pen1s. It's a well known fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume he means that they cannot attract women to sleep with them, they are a bit like that guy who shot a bunch of women in santa barbara last year...

i suspect there is a germ of truth in the idea that the way islam is practised in this country and elsewhere a lot of young muslim men have no idea how to empathise with the opposite sex.

they aren't terribly well catered for, that's the problem.

what they need is a kind of "burka-babes" porn where everything is just about sharia compliant.

like vails/hijabs and thick-ish denier nylon stocking cat-suits.( sheer enough to see camel-toe and all nips and curvy bits,but opaque enough to still just about hide modesty!! :P:P:P:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think watching porn is somewhat frowned upon....

Islamic State (Isis) have released photos of a man being publicly flogged for "watching pornographic videos".

The man, who appears to be in his 20s and is dressed in a bright red jumper, is shown being repeatedly whipped in front of a large crowd.

The punishment took place in the eastern Syrian city of Deir Ezzor, recently renamed by Islamic State al-Kheir (meaning "goodness").

Source :-http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-militants-flog-man-watching-porn-syria-1481407

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i have many gripes about young western people but their interpersonal skills are definitely (on average) much better than my generation.

my daughter is a young v attractive self confident tall blond western woman and i know many young muslim men. There is generally an incredibly huge gulf between their viewpoints. i am determined not to be judgemental about who she turns up with as a partner, but if they dish her intelligence or independence i am not sure what i will say...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   222 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.