Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Ill_handle_it

Kate & William’S Desperate 1St Weeks Without A Nanny

Recommended Posts

http://hollywoodlife.com/2014/07/10/kate-middleton-prince-williams-desperate-1st-weeks-without-a-nanny/

It is truly shocking to hear how normal Kate Middleton and Prince William’s experience as new parents has been. Believe it or not, the couple refused to have a nanny for the first two months of Prince George’s life!

Kate Middleton, 32, and Prince William, 31, continue to prove that they’re just like any other parents. Considering their lavish lifestyle as royals, you would expect to hear they had a handful of nannies to help care for Prince George when he came home from the hospital in July 2013. However, it has been revealed that they did not hire someone to help with George until he was at least 2 months old. Wow!





Prince George Didn’t Have A Nanny Until 2 Months

We are so surprised that Kate and William chose not to hire a nanny for their newborn son’s first months of life, aren’t you?



But it’s safe to admit that it just makes us love the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge even more!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the did hold out longer than most aristocrats would.

Imagine the horror of dealing with your own children!

They could come back with swords?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

waitey katie and william saxe-coburg gotha. A pair of retired 30 somethings living in the lap of luxury paid for by the state. I hope to see a referendum on the Monarchy in the UK in my lifetime.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.cookdandbombd.co.uk/forums/index.php/topic,31886.0.html

If I was Nicholas Witchell I'd kill myself

Going around the country, stuck in some bizarre 50's fantasy world of fawning deference to the Royal Family. Occasionally offering a brief concession such as 'but some republicans question this', then adding - '...but they're wrong, the twats'. But otherwise he's so far up the Queen's **** I'm surprised anyone can here him speak. He must look at himself in the mirror each morning and want to die - "this is what I am, a naked 60 year old ginger man who follows the Queen about saying grovelling things about her. Please kill me."





What's wrong with the BBC? They've become the official 24/7 propaganda channel for the Royal Family and the Olympics, with a load of dead squaddie porn in there as a garnish.





Its on every news program, its on every trailer between programs and it manages to intrude on virtually everything else they do. Now its Royal shit on all night and all weekend. It really is like we've been catapulted back into a more deferential age where nobody questions the utterly bizarre situation where in a modern country in 2012 some people get given a load of castles and treasure simply because of who they were born as. And then the rest of us have to bow down in front of them. What on earth are we thinking of?!





What's so sad is back in 1977 the sex pistols shocked the country with their anti monarchist song. That was 35 years ago. That means it was released closer to WW2 than it was to today, yet since then we seem to have become more deferential of the inbred bastards rather than less. Can you imagine a song like that making any kind of impact today?





We aren't shocked by criticism of the Royals anymore, we just dismiss it and marginalize it as irrelevant. Not really sure that's progress.







I genuinely hope that during the Juibilee concert a bandstand partially collapses and a 250 black men land on the Queens head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at the cute new prince! And ignore the ugly royal bank accounts

The main goal at the moment is to make the Cambridges seem as normal, sleep-deprived and stumbling-around-the-supermarket as any new parents. And I’m sure they are; they seem like a lovely couple, besotted with their baby. That does not change the fact they are also part of an archaic and privileged institution that is completely out of place in the contemporary world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem of Catherine Cambridge’s womb watchers

The bookmakers Coral and Ladbrokes have suspended betting on the question of whether the Duchess of Cambridge will announce a pregnancy this month. This followed a series of online bets, which may more accurately be described as leaks-for-cash; we don’t yet know. This may be nothing in a dystopia in which Prince George appears on the cover of the current edition of Vanity Fair described as “the world’s most eligible infant”, which is gruesome – who cares to speculate on the future romantic adventures of a baby? Even so, I cannot begin to imagine what sort of person puts a bet on the mysteries of a stranger’s uterus, although I can imagine all sorts of tasteless variables relating to the royal condition (or non-condition) I could bet on. But I will not write them down. They are too unkind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   215 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.