Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
fru-gal

Retaliatory Eviction Law Under Review

Recommended Posts

Some more info here:

http://www.24dash.com/news/housing/2014-05-29-Government-considering-new-laws-to-stop-retaliatory-evictions-of-private-tenants#.U4xd1YYmcVQ

The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) is considering introducing legislation to outlaw the ‘retaliatory eviction’ of tenants who complain to their landlords about poor housing conditions.

The announcement was made by Jonathan Bramhall of the DCLG’s private sector property division at the CIEH’s sixth annual housing and health conference in London.

Mr Bramhall said the DCLG received more than a thousand reports of retaliatory evictions a year and had also received evidence of the practice from the Citizens Advice Bureau.

He told the conference that, following a consultation on the private rented sector concluded in March, the government would announce by the summer any new laws it wished to introduce. It was committed, he said, to cracking down on rogue landlords and improving conditions for tenants.

One way to protect tenants, he speculated, would be to block landlords from evicting using Section 21 of the Housing Act 1988, if the property contained health-threatening hazards - an approach adopted in Australia, New Zealand and some parts of the US.

He said it could also be possible to extend rent recovery orders to landlords who had illegally evicted tenants or let hazardous properties. But no decision had yet been made.

Simon Gordon, consultant to the Residential Landlords Association, told the conference that Section 21 was a ‘holy grail’ to landlords, adding: "The government should be very careful about touching that."

Ahead of introducing any new laws, said Mr Bramhall, the DCLG was committed to publishing next month a revamped tenants’ charter and, in July, a code of practice for landlords on managing property.

Later this year, DCLG would publish a lay-person’s guide to the housing health and safety rating system and, in October, revised guidance for local authorities on tackling rogue landlords, replacing 2012 guidance.

The government had introduced powers, under the Energy Act 2013, to require landlords to fit smoke and carbon monoxide alarms but would only implement them if there was a "clear need to do so and the benefits outweighed the costs". It had not yet been decided whether to impose on landlords a legal duty to check electrical appliances, as they had for gas appliances.

On licensing houses in multiple occupation, Mr Bramhall said that some local authority selective schemes covering large areas constituted a "blanket approach", which the government did not support, covering all landlords whether they were bad or not: "The risk is that good landlords are caught up and that imposes on them extra costs. We want to focus on the bad landlords."

Two options, he said, were restricting the geographical area of selective schemes or scrapping them, in favour of schemes focusing on landlords rather than property. Landlords who were not part of a landlord association or had a failed a ‘fit and proper person test’, he said, could be subject to compulsory accreditation.

He said that next month the current £5,000 cap on fines for illegal eviction would be replaced by a potentially unlimited fine.

CIEH principal policy officer Bob Mayho said: “The CIEH is in active discussions with Better Regulation Delivery Office to set up a national expert panel on housing issues.

“In relation to the government's consideration of the next steps on their review of conditions in the sector the CIEH hoped that proposals would be brought forward to reform Section 21 and bring to an end retaliatory evictions. The CIEH has also long called for a review of the HHSRS operating and enforcement guidance and in its response to the Government discussion paper had supported a relaxation of the onerous bureaucracy associated with selective licensing schemes.”

The conference was told that the private rented sector in England is expanding rapidly and is now larger than the social rented sector, providing homes for more than four million household.

At least a third of the sector fails to meet the decency standard. Wales is set to introduce mandatory licensing of all private sector landlords later this year.

Let's see who the NASTI party decide they want to support this time.

The NASTI party decided that they wanted tennants to be charged fees by letting agents and shot down that proposal from Labour.

I will be glad when this government are out - they are destroying the society within this country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how this could be enforced sensibly. Nice idea, but open to all sorts of abuse unless heavily burdened with bureaucracy.

The last thing we need is more laws which are open to interpretation and/or unenforceable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see how this could be enforced sensibly. Nice idea, but open to all sorts of abuse unless heavily burdened with bureaucracy.

The last thing we need is more laws which are open to interpretation and/or unenforceable.

what a stupid law. if I rent under such a law, what is to stop me breaking a vital bit of kit/house and then refusing to move out. On estates, there will be undoubtably a handy john who will break stuff expertly so it looks like an accident....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   203 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.