Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Sancho Panza

Us Commercial Banks' Changing Asset Mix

Recommended Posts

Sober Look 16.2.14

'Here are some updates to the recent discussion on loan growth weakness relative to rising deposit balances at US commercial banks (see post).

1. Loan growth rate in the US, while better than in the Eurozone, remains on a downward path. The latest figures suggest that loans are increasing at less than 2%, while deposits continue to grow at 6-7% per year.


2. Loan-to-deposit ratio in the banking system hit a 35-year low recently.


3. Loans as a percentage of banks' total assets are at 52.2% - the lowest level on record. Just to put this into perspective, here is the breakdown of bank assets now vs. 10 years ago.

Assets+at+US+banks+=+10y+ago.png Source: FRB (note that derivatives and trading assets were not tracked separately 10 years ago)

Assets+at+US+banks+=+current.png Source: FRB (note that the bulk of "cash" assets are excess reserves held with the Fed) '

Sober Look 18.2.14


Friday, January 17, 2014

How bank reserves make the gap between deposits and loans disappear

Earlier this week, CNN Money ran a story on JPMorgan's quarterly results. Instead of focusing on the earnings, the author's (Stephen Gandel) discussed the fact that JPMorgan's loan-to-deposit ratio (LTD) hit a new low.

<a href="
target="_blank">FORTUNE: - The nation's largest banks are healthier than they have been in years. Someone, apparently, forgot to tell their loan officers.
JPMorgan Chase reported its 2013 profits on Tuesday. The news was mostly good -- bottom line: $18 billion --
but there was one significant black spot, not just for the bank, but for the economy in general. A key lending metric, the ratio of the bank's loans-to-deposits, hit a new low.
In 2013, JPMorgan on average lent out just 57% of its deposits. That's down from 61% a year ago and the lowest that ratio has been in at least a decade. Back in 2004, JPMorgan's loan-to-deposit percentage was as high as 88%.

While JPMorgan's LTD is particularly low, the bank is by no means unique. As discussed earlier (see post), LTD in the US is at the lows not seen in decades. On an absolute basis the gap between deposits and loans is now at some $2.4 trillion and growing. This divergence seems completely unique to the post-financial crisis environment.

Loans+vs+deposits.PNG Red = loans and leases, Blue = deposits (all commercial banks)

As the CNN story suggests, there are a few possible explanations for this trend. Here are four of them.

1. Demand for credit remains weak due to economic uncertainty, large amounts of cash on corporate balance sheets, jittery labor markets, poor wage growth expectations, general unease with taking on debt, etc.

2. Regulatory uncertainty and tighter (and to some extent unknown) capital requirements are preventing banks from extending more credit.

3. Exceptionally low rates make some forms of lending unprofitable.

4. Banks are running unusually large excess reserve positions with the Fed that are "crowding out" lending. These reserves are effectively "loans" to the Fed paying 25bp, funded with bank deposits that pay near zero, creating riskless profits with zero regulatory capital requirement.

There are arguments to be made for all four. The last one however is particularly intriguing because the $2.4 trillion gap between deposits and loans is a familiar number. The excess reserves in the banking system is now ... also around $2.4 trillion.

The chart below adds bank reserves held with the Fed to loans and leases - and the gap "disappears" (here we use total reserves vs. just the excess reserves, but the difference is not material to this trend.)

Loans+plus+reserves.PNG Red = loans and leases + bank reserves, Blue = deposits (all commercial banks)

Coincidence? Perhaps. But if there is any validity to the explanation #4 above, it would suggest that QE, which is directly responsible for the $2.4 trillion in excess reserves, was not helpful (and possibly harmful) to credit growth in the US.'

Edited by Sancho Panza

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   218 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?

      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.