Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
MartinE

432 People

Recommended Posts

Just 432 people own 50% of the private land in Scotland, according to the been last night.

Probably counting entities like the SNH and RSBP.

No wonder the other 50% is so expensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just 432 people own 50% of the private land in Scotland, according to the been last night.

Probably counting entities like the SNH and RSBP.

No wonder the other 50% is so expensive.

Not forgetting absentee landlords like some celebrity SNP supporters ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly because much of the land in Scotland is economically useless. A lot of the highland are poor quality grazing land suitable for a small population of sheep or grouse, hence the large estates. Yet certain people go on about this like it was some terrible injustice. Who on earth does it actually effect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly because much of the land in Scotland is economically useless. A lot of the highland are poor quality grazing land suitable for a small population of sheep or grouse, hence the large estates. Yet certain people go on about this like it was some terrible injustice. Who on earth does it actually effect?

Hmmm - if it did not pay for itself it would be sold off cheap and by now ownership would be more highly fragmented. You would expect over time bits would be sold off piecemeal to settle the losses. Certainly not double in price as it has, which sounds like an asset bubble has taken place.

The PR around the landed gentry acting as generous benefactors no more than slick PR IMHO.

Thanks to the single farm payment scheme, forestry and other hand outs, even crappy inactive land generates hundreds of thousands of pounds of unearned income for the large land owner.

Add on a bit of wind farm rent, fishing/hunting and other tourist type stuff - there is gold in the glens.

Would there be any more wealth created if the system was changed, or would simply the current wealth be more evenly distributed - not sure.

Probably ending planning & enviro controls would generate more wealth. Imagine private individuals or companies could stick in new railways etc. (without dealing with enviro protestors and red tape) to open up previously inaccessible land. Not been feasible for generations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   289 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.