interestrateripoff Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24573375 Gloria de Piero, the shadow minister for women and equalities, has accused a news agency of trying to obtain topless pictures of her taken when she was 15. Surely these pictures are illegal anyway to publish as she claims she was 15 when they where taken? Offering to pay thousands for essentially child porn would surely lead to any editor being arrested? Unless of course she wasn't 15 but older? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blobloblob Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Absolutely. I think it's 18 these days. Basically if you still have a copy of the Sun from the early 80s with Sam Fox in it, that's child porn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Black bar across her baps ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Miyagi Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Cake and eat it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GinAndPlatonic Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 What`s wrong with showing her tits and taking part in serious debate at the same time.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
interestrateripoff Posted October 18, 2013 Author Share Posted October 18, 2013 What`s wrong with showing her tits and taking part in serious debate at the same time.? It would possible get more people watching the debates... However for sake of equality... Would you want to see him topless? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eight Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Just this morning I was wondering what it's going to be like when we start to get parliamentary candidates with a full social media history behind them. I remember seeing an iffy video on a soft porn type site where the two half naked ladies, when they were asked what they did in their "normal" lives, said they were training to be teachers. I hope that hasn't backfired on them since. Their only hope is that it has disappeared into the porn mountain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecrashingisles Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Why can't people just let her put the past behind her. She was young and naive Are you talking about the day she joined the Labour party? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oliver Sutton Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 It would possible get more people watching the debates... However for sake of equality... Would you want to see him topless? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reck B Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Poor girl. Why can't people just let her put the past behind her. She was young and naive, now she wants to be taken seriously as a politician! There's more to her than just a face and a pair of toys you know! http://thebackbencher.co.uk/labour-2013-2015-top-ten-to-watch/gloria-de-piero/ P 100% whore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Other MPs have appeared naked in films, on stage and on the telly in their acting careers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scunnered Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Other MPs have appeared naked in films, on stage and on the telly in their acting careers. Yes, I've seen that Pickles video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPin Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 At least she did something useful, before going into politics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkins Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Another one who's never done anything outside of journalism and politics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_De_Piero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eight Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Another one who's never done anything outside of journalism and politics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloria_De_Piero Twenty years banging them in for Juventus means nothing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chronyx Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 At least she did something useful, before going into politics. You're great you are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ayatollah Buggeri Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 From the pictures posted by Paul Oakes, it's pretty clear that (a) she continued working as a glamour model well into adulthood, and ( she did so voluntarily, without coercion. I would therefore argue that she has no right to supress the publication of the 15 year-old photos, assuming that they were taken and published legally at the time. There is a legitimate public interest in knowledge of her previous career being in the public domain, especially given her current role (shadow minister for women). The press should not let her airbrush her past, Orwell-style. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecrashingisles Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 The press should not let her airbrush her past, Orwell-style. It wouldn't be the first time she's been airbrushed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPin Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 From the pictures posted by Paul Oakes, it's pretty clear that (a) she continued working as a glamour model well into adulthood, and ( she did so voluntarily, without coercion. I would therefore argue that she has no right to supress the publication of the 15 year-old photos, assuming that they were taken and published legally at the time. There is a legitimate public interest in knowledge of her previous career being in the public domain, especially given her current role (shadow minister for women). The press should not let her airbrush her past, Orwell-style. I'm not too worried about that then, it's the photos that are 15 years old! I thought we were talking about photos of a 15 year old girl! I don't work for the BBC so I appreciate the slightly more mature lady. er, over nineteen! I think if she got her tits out again, I might vote for her! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happy_renting Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 She should have taken Cameron's advice and worn a jumper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si1 Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 <br />Yes, I've seen that Pickles video.<br /><br /><br /><br />does he play Jabba the Hut? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Hovis Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Absolutely. I think it's 18 these days. Basically if you still have a copy of the Sun from the early 80s with Sam Fox in it, that's child porn. Ah, the ever-expanding definition of a "child". Another thread recently cited an article saying anybody under 25 was a child. It makes stats meaningless, there was a story on the radio last week about the number of "children" locked up in police cells overnight and what a scandal it was. Only later in the story did it mention that it referred to under-18s, but it was spun like 12 yos were being locked up (agreed that this is bad) when in reality it's 17yos (which is fine). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPin Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Ah, the ever-expanding definition of a "child". Another thread recently cited an article saying anybody under 25 was a child. It makes stats meaningless, there was a story on the radio last week about the number of "children" locked up in police cells overnight and what a scandal it was. Only later in the story did it mention that it referred to under-18s, but it was spun like 12 yos were being locked up (agreed that this is bad) when in reality it's 17yos (which is fine). Frank, there are some 15 year olds I would lend my car to (if it were legal), and people of over 40, that I won't let cross the road on their own, and shouldn't have a credit card. The word "child" makes me think of the little people you find at shopping malls, who are lost, and then you take them to the store security, not some tattooed 16 year old thug, with more facial hair than me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19 year mortgage 8itch Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 The word "child" makes me think of the little people you find at shopping malls, who are lost, and then you take them to the store security, not some tattooed 16 year old thug, with more facial hair than me. And what about the boys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPin Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 And what about the boys? Too male to admit they are lost, I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.