Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
The Masked Tulip

How San Francisco Became The Least Affordable City In The Us

Recommended Posts

A great quality of life and a lot of high-paying professional jobs meant that a lot of people wanted to live here. And they still do.

But the city did not allow its housing supply to keep up with demand. San Francisco was down-zoned (that is, the density of housing or permitted expansion of construction was reduced) to protect the "character" that people loved. It created the most byzantine planning process of any major city in the country.

Many outspoken citizens did—and continue to do—everything possible to fight new high-density development or, as they saw it, protecting the city from undesirable change.

Read more: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/housing/2013/10/san-francisco-exodus/7205/#ixzz2hnZwwY5m

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is as expensive as London or new york. However, it is still a beautiful city, but you may have to live in the outer suburbs or dormitory towns. Worth it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Geography doesn't really help. London can easily expand on all sides (although the eastern side is prone to a bit wet). SF is enclosed on three sides by water and by a whacking great hill to the south, and about as built-up as it can get without increasing housing density. There is scope down the peninsula, but even with the half decent public transport SF has, it would need more.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The homeless people in San Francisco are there because San Francisco is a significantly better place than average to be homeless.

It's full of tourists and rich liberals. Rich pickings.

As implied in the article, if San Francisco rents are too high, you go live in Oakland. It's not the cause of the homeless people in San Francisco (there are a lot, and they are plenty noticeable).

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   224 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?

      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.