Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Bankers Are Receiving 'himalayan Pay Packages' Despite Poor Performance, Says Senior Bank Of England Executive


Recommended Posts

Haldane is exec director with responsibility for stability.

BoE grants their licences

He should stop talking about it like a hapless bystander and force them to stop.

Else shut up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite. I made a similar comment on the outgoing Hector Sants berates City article...

http://www.ft.com/cm...l#axzz1rTx9cQmO

Sants berates City firms over progress

It appears they're attempting jaw jaw rather than war war.

They had no problem handing out oodles of cash to these people over an afternoon, but after 5 years they're still talking about maybe perhaps wishing hopefully they stopped looting.

If UK wasn't a banana republic monarchy this may be construed as negligent.

Edited by Red Knight
Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2134739/Bankers-receiving-Himalayan-pay-packages-despite-poor-performance--says-senior-Bank-England-executive.html

'Bankers’ pay is still at Himalayan heights while their performance is in the foothills, according to a senior Bank of England executive.

In a hard-hitting speech, Andrew Haldane said top financiers were on an ‘upwards-only pay escalator’ where they cash in whatever happens to profits or their employer’s share price.

‘While bank performance has fallen off a cliff, executive pay remains close to pre-crisis Himalayan heights,’ he said in a speech published by the Bank yesterday.

Mr Haldane said the pay package enjoyed by a UK banking chief executive rose by an average of 13 per cent a year for nearly two decades prior to the 2007 credit crunch. In 1989, it was £310,000 but had shot up to £2.7million by 2007.

Mr Haldane, who is executive director for financial stability, said banks were playing a game which is ‘a case not so much of keeping up with the Joneses as keeping up with the Goldmans’.

This was a reference to the American investment bank Goldman Sachs, which has been nicknamed ‘Golden Sacks’ for the pay deals lavished on its workers.

In a separate attack, the director general of the Institute of Directors will today slam the controversial pay packet handed to the chief executive of Barclays.

The bank is facing ferocious criticism over its decision to award up to £26.6million to Bob Diamond, despite its disappointing performance.

The package includes everything from his £1.35million basic salary to a £5.75million payment toward his tax bill and the cashing in of share awards made in previous years.

Unhappy: Investors are angry at the decision by Barclays to pay out £2.15billion in bonuses last year ¿ more than three times the £730million paid in dividends to shareholders

Unhappy: Investors are angry at the decision by Barclays to pay out £2.15billion in bonuses last year - more than three times the £730million paid in dividends to shareholders

Investors are angry at the decision by Barclays to pay out £2.15billion in bonuses last year – more than three times the £730million paid in dividends to shareholders.

In a speech in London, the Institute of Directors’ Simon Walker will say: ‘If some banks pay three times more in bonuses to top executives than they do in total dividends to shareholders, then I think there are questions to be asked.’

FINANCE CHIEF BLASTS 'OVERPAID' BOSSES

Overpaid, reckless and incompetent financial bosses were lambasted by the City regulator yesterday.

Hector Sants, the departing chief executive of the Financial Services Authority, used his final speech to call for integrity to replace greed.

‘Should there not be some level of expectation that people entrusted with the leadership of financial services organisations ultimately are driven by the desire to do the right thing,’ he said.

‘It should not solely be about how much we earn but also how much we care for the market’s users and their well-being.’

He said ‘non-financial performance measures’ should be reflected in pay.

Mr Walker said he was pleased to see ‘encouraging’ signs that shareholders are taking a more activist approach and voting against pay deals which are excessive.

A recent report from the High Pay Commission also attacked the ‘excessive’ pay packages given to company executives, which it said had had a corrosive impact on the economy.

Within ten years, it predicts the average boss of a FTSE 100 company will be paid a record of nearly 215 times more than the average worker.

It concluded: ‘The public is rapidly running out of patience with a system that allows those at the top to enrich themselves while everyone else struggles to make ends meet.’

Last night a spokesman for the British Bankers’ Association said: ‘We are now committed to ensuring that the pay structures in the industry reflect the long-term health of the organisation that the bankers work for.’

Mr Haldane’s speech was delivered in Berlin earlier this month.'

love it when the BOE and the FSA step up to the plate and point out that the horse bolted a long time ago.yaya,thanks for that.

if there was ever a titanic style olympic competition for sleeping on iceberg watch,these institutions would preoduce world beaters

Does he mean himself?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite. I made a similar comment on the outgoing Hector Sants berates City article...

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9be6305a-8dfa-11e1-bbae-00144feab49a.html#axzz1rTx9cQmO

Sants berates City firms over progress

Yes. Vince Cable will also be along soon to say someone "really should start thinking about doing something about it".

Go Vince!

You de man!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Bankers’ pay is still at Himalayan heights while their performance is in the foothills, according to a senior Bank of England executive.

Most any industry faced with such a revelation (a revelation that's been blatantly obvious to everyone else for years and years) would already have taken steps to improve matters rather than issuing a statement brazenly bragging about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most any industry faced with such a revelation (a revelation that's been blatantly obvious to everyone else for years and years) would already have taken steps to improve matters rather than issuing a statement brazenly bragging about it.

A bit like Kunt's joke at the mansion house speech - never has so much been owed by so many to so few, must have raised a few laughs to the gang of attending banksters, the joke is on us.

Well all that money was made up, they didn't care if it was never repaid as they made commission ever time they issued it - under the full gaze of the bankrupt oof england and with full support f lax monetary policy to keep the debt bubble growing and growing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 429 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.