rantnrave Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Express Estate Agency gets its knuckles rapped. 'Under market value' agent scolded by advertising watchdog Friday 9th December 2011 An estate agent which advertised homes for sale at under market value has been reprimanded by the advertising watchdog. Manchester-based Sell Quick, trading as Express Estate Agency, was the subject of four complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority after its 'misleading' advertising on websites. The adverts were for apparently low-priced property, but would-be purchasers found that more was in fact being asked. One advert stated that a two-bed terrace was for sale at offers over £49,950, which it claimed was a £22,500 discount. The advert said: "The Express Estate Agency offers this attractively priced property to buyers who are in a position to buy relatively swiftly. This property is priced low to encourage a quicker than normal sale." A three-bed terrace was offered for sale at offers over £74,950. It claimed this was a 21% discount, and that an independent RICS value had valued it at £95,000. The advert said: "The property is offered significantly below market value … These genuine discounts are offered based upon the property's independently verified market value. All of our surveyed properties have been valued by an independent Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Valuer in order to confirm that all of our properties are offered with true discounts." On another website, a three-bedroom terrace home was advertised as for sale at £69,950. The advert said the property had last been for sale at £99,950 in April 2005. On Express Estate Agency's own website it stated that offers over £64,950 were sought for one property. The advert said it was priced low to encourage a quicker than normal sale. Another agent, SB property, plus three members of public, challenged whether the advertised prices and discounts featured in the ads were misleading. Express Estate Agency told the ASA that their properties were offered at marketing prices and not asking prices. They said that they aimed to sell the properties at a higher price than the 'Offers in excess of' or 'Offers over' marketing prices shown in the ads. They said that when dealing with consumers' inquiries, their representatives explained their pricing policy and that they valued the properties above the marketing price listed in the ad. They also said the price a vendor may initially seek and the offer which they eventually accept were often very different. Express said said of a property referred to as having a '£22,500 discount from previous agents marketing price' that it was clear that offers were invited in excess of £49,950. A complainant had made an offer over £49,950 which had been rejected. Express said it was the vendors' prerogative to accept or reject an offer. Express also referred to Scottish Home Report valuations which they said were often very optimistic, especially in the current climate. Express also explained that the property in one advert was marketed at offers in excess of £64,950. They said they received several offers in excess of that value and that the property was sold for a value significantly in excess of £64,950. The complaints were upheld. The ASA said that advertised prices should be an accurate reflection of the prices sought for the property. While properties had been described as priced low to attract a quick sale, in fact three of the complainants said that Express informed them that the vendor sought an offer which was significantly in excess of the advertised price. The ASA also noted the ad invited 'Offers in excess of £74,950' and that genuine discounts were offered based upon the property's independently verified market value. However, the vendor said that the property had been valued at a much higher value within the Home Report valuation and that the minimum offer they were prepared to accept was significantly greater than £74,950, which had been made clear to Express. The ads must not appear again in their current form. The ASA has told Express to ensure that, in all future ads, the prices listed are an accurate reflection of the price sought for the property and are capable of robust substantiation. Sourced from EA Today Edited December 9, 2011 by rantnrave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Democorruptcy Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 According to that ruling no houses should be able to be advertised as "offers over" or "price guide". There should only be "fixed price" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scrappycocco Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 or advertising a property as being in st albans when its really in london colney, or advertising a property as being in hampstead when its really in kilburn..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bradbury Robinson Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Is it just me or is that a really badly written article? It seems to take a very clear point and extrapolate it into a full page article which repeats itself about nine times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snugglybear Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Is it just me or is that a really badly written article? It seems to take a very clear point and extrapolate it into a full page article which repeats itself about nine times. At a very quick glance (some of us have work to do) it looks like a cut-and-paste from the ASA's adjudication which is here http://www.asa.org.uk/ASA-action/Adjudications/2011/12/Sell-Quick-Ltd/SHP_ADJ_169203.aspx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Knimbies who say No Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 Express Estate Agency gets its knuckles rapped. Sourced from EA Today Oh well, they'll just have to advertise them at the full market price, and erm, leave them unsold.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rantnrave Posted December 9, 2011 Author Share Posted December 9, 2011 Oh well, they'll just have to advertise them at the full market price, and erm, leave them unsold.. Therein lies the contradiction in the service of Express Estate Agency. They pitch themselves (on all sorts of websites) as being for motivated sellers. How motivated is a seller who is happy to advertise a lower price and then refuse offers until they get what they wanted in the first place? Seems that the Express Estate Agency is about as effective at talking down vendors' delusions as the rest of the EA industry. Little more than a back door route to the same stand-off between buyers and sellers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Knimbies who say No Posted December 9, 2011 Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Therein lies the contradiction in the service of Express Estate Agency. They pitch themselves (on all sorts of websites) as being for motivated sellers. How motivated is a seller who is happy to advertise a lower price and then refuse offers until they get what they wanted in the first place? Seems that the Express Estate Agency is about as effective at talking down vendors' delusions as the rest of the EA industry. Little more than a back door route to the same stand-off between buyers and sellers. Indeed, although I feel a bit sorry for them as perhaps their vendors are not quite as motivated as the agency supposed. I can't say I think they've done anything that should invite censure from the ASA to my mind, assuming the RICS valuations are the basis of the 'discount' figs. Or I should word that as "their marketing guff is no worse than anybody else's". Plenty of listings allude to great value which is nothing of the sort, I guess the Express people made the mistake of putting a number on it. Edited December 9, 2011 by cheeznbreed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tim123 Posted December 11, 2011 Share Posted December 11, 2011 Indeed, although I feel a bit sorry for them as perhaps their vendors are not quite as motivated as the agency supposed. I can't say I think they've done anything that should invite censure from the ASA to my mind, assuming the RICS valuations are the basis of the 'discount' figs. Or I should word that as "their marketing guff is no worse than anybody else's". Except that in this case they advertise 100% of their stock this way. That's what makes them different from the normal EAs who mostly offer property with the expectation of achieving a sale at below the advertised price (even if they hope for more) tim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.