timebandit Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 (edited) Question Time Just starting http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcone/watchlive/ Edited November 3, 2011 by timebandit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lulu Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Question Time Just starting http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcone/watchlive/ Not sure I can watch - I dont hate many people but Ed Balls is the most odious man I can think of. My TV was quite expensive and am not sure I can risk the chances of me losing it and throwing things at it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cashinmattress Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 It's hardly a case of 'versus' as they both suck the boaby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybong Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 It's a laugh the way "the panel" are all calling the St Pauls protestors "anti capitalist" when in fact the protestors themselves claim to be pro capitalist. Total farce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Britney's Piers Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 It's a laugh the way "the panel" are all calling the St Pauls protestors "anti capitalist" when in fact the protestors themselves claim to be pro capitalist. Total farce. This is QT, establishment prop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHERWICK Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 This is QT, establishment prop. Who's that idiot next to Shirley Williams? Not the **** Balls, but on the other side? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHERWICK Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Who's that idiot next to Shirley Williams? Not the **** Balls, but on the other side? Wow, can't believe Shirley is 81 - she's still compos mentis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Bart' Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 This is QT, establishment prop. And dull, pointless establishment prop at that. Watch Max Keiser instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milton Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 It's a laugh the way "the panel" are all calling the St Pauls protestors "anti capitalist" when in fact the protestors themselves claim to be pro capitalist. Total farce. +1.76245 Change the tune Beeb. Anti Corporatist.....Anti Fascist..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybong Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Teresa May in a real fumble over the matter of Royal Assent over much of the UK law making. Total farce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cica Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 (edited) Hitchman just spoke just spoke a lot of truth about politicians in general e.g. run by billionaires etc. Edited November 3, 2011 by cica Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybong Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 (edited) Hitchens - "thank goodness we're NOT a democracy in the UK". Total farce. Edited November 3, 2011 by billybong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traktion Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Where can I sign to opt out of state governance, without having to leave the country? Being forced to be part of this nonsense is nauseating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traktion Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Inside your head. If only it was that easy to keep their thugs from my door step! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timebandit Posted November 3, 2011 Author Share Posted November 3, 2011 (edited) Dam! what a waste of time, I should have stayed with Newsnight. Oh well back to Andrew Neil and Michael Portillo. Oh good the other Diane Edited November 3, 2011 by timebandit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Bart' Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Inside your head. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzzkV08RO8I Alternatively: 'They can't get inside you,' she had said. But they could get inside you. 'What happens to you here is for ever,' O'Brien had said. That was a true word. There were things, your own acts, from which you could never recover. Something was killed in your breast: burnt out, cauterized out.George Orwell, 1984 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'Bart' Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Dam! what a waste of time, I should have stayed with Newsnight. "Just say no". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric pebble Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Not the **** Balls, ....//............ Do you mean C NT? How I LOATHE that C NT. :angry: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
porca misèria Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Wow, can't believe Shirley is 81 - she's still compos mentis. Um, that must make a nice change from the days she messed up a generation's education. We plebs could go comprehensive or ... no, there was no or, not for ordinary people. Didn't stop her and her family staying well clear of her mess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
porca misèria Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Inside your head. Like Stephen Hawking, who famously has nowhere else ... Or like the prisoner with a positive attitude. I was going to post Mahler's version, but hitting Google shows this goes back a lot further! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadtoruin Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Um, that must make a nice change from the days she messed up a generation's education. We plebs could go comprehensive or ... no, there was no or, not for ordinary people. Didn't stop her and her family staying well clear of her mess. Although to be fair, the previous Grammar system was dumping over 80% (and mainly the plebs) in secondary moderns where the educational attainments were lower than comprehensives subsequently were. But then people don't like to focus on the 80%, preferring to concentrate on how well the 20% fared. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bricor mortis Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Wow, can't believe Shirley is 81 - she's still compos mentis. But her name is an anagram of " I whirl aimlessly" If that doesn't describe her mentality it does describe her political career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonester76 Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Although to be fair, the previous Grammar system was dumping over 80% (and mainly the plebs) in secondary moderns where the educational attainments were lower than comprehensives subsequently were. But then people don't like to focus on the 80%, preferring to concentrate on how well the 20% fared. That's because they were supposed to build masses of technical colleges to provide people with a trade but they decided they couldn't be bothered. Grammar schools allowed working class kids the chance of an education as good, if not better, than a public school. Now we all sink in the cesspits that are called comprehensives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNACR Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) Although to be fair, the previous Grammar system was dumping over 80% (and mainly the plebs) in secondary moderns where the educational attainments were lower than comprehensives subsequently were. But then people don't like to focus on the 80%, preferring to concentrate on how well the 20% fared. John Prescott rants on about the inequity of the secondary modern but, still went on to be deputy PM. See anyone from a (genuine) comprehensive being deputy prime minister any time soon? Bitterness from those, or those whose children are without the academic ability to pass the eleven-plus will continue to see bright children from low-income families denied opportunities which could, and should, be easily made available. Shirley Williams has more responsibility for the current torpor in the economy than Ed Balls or Gordon Brown. Edited November 4, 2011 by Soon Not a Chain Retailer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goat Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) Although to be fair, the previous Grammar system was dumping over 80% (and mainly the plebs) in secondary moderns where the educational attainments were lower than comprehensives subsequently were. So instead of improving the 80% of bad schools they got rid of the 20% of good ones so that no-one could see how bad the rest were. Then they hid the failure by dumbing down the curriculum so that it looked like they were succeeding. It's why the leftists hate the private schools, they show just how badly the socialist educational establishment is failing. Edited November 4, 2011 by Goat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.