Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Dave Beans

Mps Don't Need To Pay Back Any Money, Because The Regularity Authority Wasn't Good Enough To Catch Them

Recommended Posts



MPs who wrongly claimed taxpayer-funded expenses for websites featuring party political logos were let off partly because of a watchdog's lax monitoring.

Details of 21 investigations into alleged abuses of taxpayer-funded expenses have been published after a climbdown by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa).

All but one of the cases, which numbered former Cabinet minister Alan Johnson among those investigated, involved illegitimate claims for public cash for websites.

Ipsa's compliance officer ruled that they should be spared paying back the cash because the breaches were relatively minor and the watchdog was "in part at fault".

Officials should have spotted the infringements and blocked the payments in the first place, Martyn Taylor said, ruling that MPs who had already coughed up should get their cheques back.

Ipsa is also consulting on changes to the rules over when MPs under investigation should be named - including removing the discretion given to the compliance officer over individual cases.

Existing guidelines suggest politicians should be identified when a formal investigation is launched, but no details had been released since Ipsa took over running the system 17 months ago.

The then-compliance officer Luke March said in July that naming MPs could be "unfair" and suggested there should be no publicity at all if they were cleared.

Within days of making the comments - which raised the prospect that the new regime could be less transparent than the old discredited one - Mr March resigned.

Mr Taylor, previously head of governance at the watchdog, has been filling in until a permanent replacement is recruited.

In its consultation document, Ipsa said that keeping the names of MPs under investigation secret until it concludes would "respect the need for transparency and prevent speculation".

While the arguments were "finely balanced", revealing politicians' identities at the launch of a full inquiry risked them being "accused of wrongful expense claims before a full and fair investigation is completed", it said.

Other options were to publish only the name of the MPs and the category of expense involved at the outset or to leave it in the hands of the compliance officer.

A spokesman said procedures had been tightened to prevent a repeat of the website breaches.

The only other investigation listed involved Conservative MP Peter Aldous, who repaid £361 in hotel bills which he claimed while the taxpayer was also funding rent on a flat for him.

In the conclusions of the investigation, Mr Taylor said the overlap lasted "a few days whilst Mr Aldous acquired a number of basic items to make his rented flat habitable".

Again he found Ipsa "partly at fault" for paying out the money in the first place.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 285 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?

      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.