Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Question Time - Nicola Horlick Being Pretty Apocalyptic


RichM

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

Yeah, I read a piece by Horlick in the paper about how she resented the 'superwoman' tag. Basically she said it's much easier to have a high powered career if you have enough money to contract out your children's upbringing to someone else. I paraphrase somewhat, but that was the gist of it.

Like others, I question her judgement in light of her involvement with Madoff. Just seems like another bullshitter, which appears to be a desirable quality for hitting the upper echelons of life in the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
1
HOLA442

Well, for Nicola Horlicks things are Apocalyptic

The tide went out and she was not wearing trunks.

April 2012

Georgina's has cost £300,000 to open — a relatively modest sum for a London restaurant. And Horlick, who has put up most of the money herself, insists it will break even within months. "I wanted to do this for Georgie, but I would not have done it if I had thought that it was not going to be commercially viable."

Stay-at-home mothers who never go out at night RUINED my business, complains City 'superwoman' Nicola Horlick

Multi-millionaire mother-of-six had to close London bistro after 18 months

8 January 2014

http://www.dailymail...la-Horlick.html

Nicola Horlick closes restaurant due to 'excessively high' business rates

The growing band of retailers calling for the Government to overhaul business rates to protect the high street has an unlikely new ally.

Nicola Horlick is seeking investment for a restaurant in west London.

Harriet Dennys

By Harriet Dennys, City Diary Editor

6:47PM GMT 07 Jan 2014

http://www.telegraph...ness-rates.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447

Just at a time when London has experienced a mini boomlet it doesn't look good for the entrepreneur to lose her £300,000 investment in the restaurant business. I never understand the concept of starting a business in something that you manage as opposed to plying your own trade, you are going to struggle if you are having to buy the skills in.

Edited by crashmonitor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410

I rarely watch QT. It's standard BBC left-leaning debate-lite. Dimbledore just strikes me as a sort of rather bumbling, old, out of touch gentleman who still lives in the golden utopia of post-war statism.

I believe he lives in the 'golden utopia' of £15,000 an episode...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8916697/Poorly-paid-David-Dimbleby-is-BBC-cuts-victim.html

Edited by juvenal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411

I believe he lives in the 'golden utopia' of £15,000 an episode...

http://www.telegraph...uts-victim.html

Yes not even moving the production team to Glasgow was enough to shift him.

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/feb/11/bbc-question-time-glasgow-move

As for Horlick, ah yes the dreaded 'socialist' business rates. Its never the payment to the rentier is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413

I rarely watch QT. It's standard BBC left-leaning debate-lite. Dimbledore just strikes me as a sort of rather bumbling, old, out of touch gentleman who still lives in the golden utopia of post-war statism.

i never watch it. for me, its stage managed. from what i understand there is no freedom to ask what you want and if you do it is cut. is that about right? why would you watch what is effectively a soap box for politicians.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414
14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417

http://

www.theguardian.com/media/2011/feb/04/question-time-david-dimbleby-bbc-glasgow?INTCMP=SRCH&guni=Article:in%20body%20link

David Dimbleby is at loggerheads with BBC executives over a plan to move production of Question Time from London to Glasgow.

Of course Dimbleby and his family and friends etc will have no influence on what the BBC does.

Edited by billybong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419

I rarely watch QT. It's standard BBC left-leaning debate-lite. Dimbledore just strikes me as a sort of rather bumbling, old, out of touch gentleman who still lives in the golden utopia of post-war statism.

He's much worse than bumbling and out of touch, he clearly thinks there's nothing wrong with the status quo and does his best to suppress or ignore informed criticism of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421

I actually watched it last night. Well I was working and it was on in the background. (feck all else on).

Just seemed to be repeatedly hijacked by public sector (NHS) workers in the audience - whatever the question was.

Indeed by the time the audience had recited their NUPE prepared speeches I'd forgotten what they were talking about.

Left in no doubt that the real purpose of the NHS is to keep NUPE and its members in business. Good luck to any government tackling that.

Good starter question about whether the poor young, should support rich pensioners. Don't know how that question sneaked past the official censor. Come on, own up.

Edited by aSecureTenant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422

I actually watched it last night. Well I was working and it was on in the background. (feck all else on).

Just seemed to be repeatedly hijacked by public sector (NHS) workers in the audience - whatever the question was.

Indeed by the time the audience had recited their NUPE prepared speeches I'd forgotten what they were talking about.

Left in no doubt that the real purpose of the NHS is to keep NUPE and its members in business. Good luck to any government tackling that.

Good starter question about whether the poor young, should support rich pensioners. Don't know how that question sneaked past the official censor. Come on, own up.

Just wonder whether this audience participation is really about David Dimbledy participation. Let's face it he would hardly be needed if we stuck to the original question and the panels answers. Instead we have the lunacy of this moronic audience participation (brilliantly parodied by Harry Enfield) and David Dimbledy being able to play God.

Edited by crashmonitor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information