Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  

Conservative Mp David Amess Attacks Bbc Pay And 'bias'

Recommended Posts


A veteran Conservative MP has accused the BBC of having a "fervently anti-cuts" agenda, while paying "absolutely ludicrous" salaries to its executives.

David Amess told the Commons the end of the digital switchover in 2012 would be a good time to rethink BBC funding.

He also criticised "one or two female newsreaders" for smiling when they read serious news items.

Culture minister Ed Vaizey said the BBC was a fine broadcaster, but action was being taken over concerns about bias.

The government announced in October 2010 that the BBC licence fee would be frozen for six years.

'Consistent policy'

Mr Amess, MP for Southend West, accused the BBC of bias on several issues, including the reporting of events in Israel, which he claimed was covered in a "highly disproportionate manner", showing the state in a "poor light".

"More poignantly, it is fervently anti-cuts and ensures that this message pervades every aspect of BBC programming," he said.

"Since the general election the BBC has embarked upon a consistent policy of criticising government actions, which is rather amusing given that the director general declared 'bias at the BBC...' - so he must have recognised there was bias - 'bias at the BBC was a thing of the past'."

He also criticised the pay packets of senior staff: "I just think that salaries that the management of the BBC are paid are absolutely ludicrous.

"The director general - £838,000. This is madness. Other directors' pay, as of March 2011: one gets £488,000, another one gets £517,000, another one £467,000, another one £452,000.

"Not to mention what the financial controller gets."

'Impartiality seminars'

Turning his attention to newsreaders, Mr Amess said: "I don't know whether we have brilliant presenters.

"I would just say that it annoys me when one or two female presenters, I don't know whether they've had too much botox or something, when they are presenting the news and it's a very serious subject, they are smiling, which I find slightly annoying."

In response, Mr Vaizey said the new BBC Trust chairman - and former Tory minister - Lord Patten was looking at concerns about bias.

The culture secretary also said he understood that the corporation would in future have "annual impartiality reviews" and regular "impartiality seminars" to "re-educate staff".

But he added: "It's right and proper that we acknowledge, I think, that the BBC is one of the finest broadcasters not just in this country but in the world.

"It sets a quality bar which is why we have such high quality television and radio in this country."

The BBC declined to comment on the debate.

I think the BBC is a load of old crap.

Edited by cool_hand

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the BBC is a load of old crap.

Clearly you've never watched TV in America..

Lead story last night was about Economists calling for a cut of the 50p tax rate, clearly biased towards the conservatives..

The only real reason for the anti-BBC campaign is called 'Rupert Murdoch'.. personally, I think that if the BBC is annoying politicians (New Labour were not always impressed) then it must be doing something right..

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

When he talks about female presenters smiling I'm sure he is thinking of Kate Silverton.

This ridiculous woman is absolutely awful as a news presenter.

Constantly smiling into the camera, raised eyebrows, a twitching of the lips, a furrowed brow.

She forgets that she is presenting the news, she is NOT the news.

Throw in the halting speech, the lowering of the tone, when there is serious news to report.

Plus of course she is pregnant...and don't we know it. Constant magazine articles and interviews

revealing her quite personal biological details. The BBC seem determined that we see her presenting the news right up to delivery.

I absolutely guarantee that when she finally gives birth the BBC will report it on their main news.

Mumsnet crap or what? :angry:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 335 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?

      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.