Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Land Reg +1.3%mom -2.1%yoy


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442

They'd be right for a change though.

This confirms the upward trend earlier this year that Nationwide and then Halifax picked up on.

things have turned down since, going on sheeple sentiment of last few months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444

I've tried to show in the table below why the Land Registry headline volume numbers are always misleading. Land Reg compares a first release number for this year with a revised number for the previous year.

The revised number is always higher than the first release (presumably because some sales notifications are late in arriving) and consequently volumes will always be understated for the latest reporting month.

This happens month after month, but no one at Land Registry seems to care even though it paints the agency in a very poor light. Of course they may not even be aware of the problem because they don't actually compile the stats. The statistical analysis is actually done by Calnea Analytics, the owners of mouseprice.com (Calnea itself is owned by Landmark Information Group).

LandRegVolumesMay2011.gif

Edit: redundant word

Edited by FreeTrader
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445

NW still being pumelled

Manchester - 0.3 MoM -4.1 YoY

Blackburn with Darwen -4.4% MoM (not a typo!!!) -10.4% YoY

People not dropping prices though. Seem to see national figures saying slight increase so they keep them high. Nuts really.

I think you mean NW leading the recovery !!!

Edited by TheCountOfNowhere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446

I've tried to show in the table below why the Land Registry headline volume numbers are always misleading. Land Reg compares a first release number for this year with a revised number for the previous year.

The revised number is always higher than the first release (presumably because some sales notifications are late in arriving) and consequently volumes will always be understated for the latest reporting month.

This happens month after month, but no one at Land Registry seems to care even though it paints the agency in a very poor light. Of course they may not even be aware of the problem because they don't actually compile the stats. The statistical analysis is actually done by Calnea Analytics, the owners of mouseprice.com (Calnea itself is owned by Landmark Information Group).

LandRegVolumesMay2011.gif

Edit: redundant word

Good info thanks FT, didn't know the land registry data was compiled by Calnea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414

Can I just point out the obvious....house prices are stil 2.3% lower than they were this time last year. average prices are still back at 2004 prices ( unless you're some gormless egyt paying over the odds ), there has been no house prices increase really in 7 years. House prices don't double ever ten years,...that was a lie. House prices will probably half in the next ten, that's not a lie.

the land registry spring bounce lag is pretty much over and there was pretty much no bounce. The rest of the year should make for healthy reading. :lol:

Edited by TheCountOfNowhere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415
15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417

Can I just point out the obvious....house prices are stil 2.3% lower than they were this time last year. average prices are still back at 2004 prices ( unless you're some gormless egyt paying over the odds ), there has been no house prices increase really in 7 years. House prices don't double ever ten years,...that was a lie. House prices will probably half in the next ten, that's not a lie.

the land registry spring bounce lag is pretty much over and there was pretty much no bounce. The rest of the year should make for healthy reading. :lol:

To try and put a positive spin on the (admittedly grim) news, we should also remember that by July 2008, Y-O-Y was only down 3.1% - prices dropped roughly 2% each month over the following 6 months. I'm sure if that happens again though, the B of E will drop interest rates by another four and a half percent..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information