Executive Sadman Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Protesting at the opening of a Playboy club (placard on the right) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1394770/Alex-Reid-glamour-girls-cuddles-busty-female-plunging-dress-Playboy-Club-launch.html Cambridge also seems to be full of these types. 'freedom loving' hippies (so long as its something they agree with) with some miserable puritanical streak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarahBell Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 SW thrive on other people's demos. They provide banners with their name on for all sorts of stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 What a waste of time. I do like the placard the burd on the left has. 'Women not sex objects'. Eh - sorry - but women are sex objects. That is their entire point in the survival of the species. That is their ultimate point in existance. Why are these people usually very stupid ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonb Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Protesting at the opening of a Playboy club (placard on the right) http://www.dailymail...lub-launch.html Cambridge also seems to be full of these types. 'freedom loving' hippies (so long as its something they agree with) with some miserable puritanical streak. They think it should be available for free, and I wouldn't necessarily disagree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloraPoste Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 What a waste of time. I do like the placard the burd on the left has. 'Women not sex objects'. Eh - sorry - but women are sex objects. That is their entire point in the survival of the species. That is their ultimate point in existance. Why are these people usually very stupid ? I feel very sorry for the women in your life (if there are any). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superted187 Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 I don't get the point of these protests. Magazines like playboy employ a consenting female to get her bits out. She isn't forced, and its entirely her choice, and she'll be getting paid. The pictures are then published into a magazine that is hidden away at the top shelves of newsagents. You can chose to look at them, and you can chose to buy them if you want. They aren't forced in front of your eyes in some bizarre Clockwork Orange viewing. What do these guys want? To ban this sort of publication? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Masked Tulip Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 What's SWP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 I feel very sorry for the women in your life (if there are any). Why ? I am making a basic factual point based on the simple facts of human life. It was not meant in any condescending manner or anything. Woman are sex objects to attract men to ejaculate inside them to provide them with offspring. That is the female purpose in life and the male purpose in life summed up in once sentence. I think you took what I was saying wrong. Women are sex objects. That is not an insult in any way. No different from saying men are spunk machines. Because we are. I don't get the point of these protests. Magazines like playboy employ a consenting female to get her bits out. She isn't forced, and its entirely her choice, and she'll be getting paid. The pictures are then published into a magazine that is hidden away at the top shelves of newsagents. You can chose to look at them, and you can chose to buy them if you want. They aren't forced in front of your eyes in some bizarre Clockwork Orange viewing. What do these guys want? To ban this sort of publication? Exactly. And when the women in question are ever asked about it ? The majority clearly state they are more than hapy with the situation. However the 'protesters' just point blank ignore the people they are supposed to be 'protecting'. Complete selfishness. They actually don't care about the women invovled - because if they were they would do as they wish. And that is let them get on with their jobs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilf Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 What's SWP? Socialist Workers Party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrPin Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 They are not involved in work or Socialism! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosh Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEATH Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Someone go offer them a free ticket to watch Nadal at Wimbledon and see if there are any takers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Why ? I am making a basic factual point based on the simple facts of human life. It was not meant in any condescending manner or anything. Woman are sex objects to attract men to ejaculate inside them to provide them with offspring. That is the female purpose in life and the male purpose in life summed up in once sentence. I think you took what I was saying wrong. Women are sex objects. That is not an insult in any way. No different from saying men are spunk machines. Because we are. Yes, back in the days of the Neanderthals. Women have moved on since then, not sure about the men Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SarahBell Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 They are not involved in work or Socialism! I know one who worked. He was of the belief that smackheads were just "people who couldn't manage their own affairs" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Someone go offer them a free ticket to watch Nadal at Wimbledon and see if there are any takers. Exactly. These people are offended by people's bodies being used to sell stuff and for money ? So why no huge uproar about the diet coke ads or male strippers or the chippendales ? If this lot complained about ALL of this then they may have a point. Not one I agree with but at least they would be consistent. However they only do it for females and not males. They simply do not understand how hypocritical and narrow minded they are being. Yes, back in the days of the Neanderthals. Women have moved on since then, not sure about the men Really ? Better inform nature it's system is broken then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Executive Sadman Posted June 6, 2011 Author Share Posted June 6, 2011 Exactly. These people are offended by people's bodies being used to sell stuff and for money ? So why no huge uproar about the diet coke ads or male strippers or the chippendales ? If this lot complained about ALL of this then they may have a point. Not one I agree with but at least they would be consistent. However they only do it for females and not males. They simply do not understand how hypocritical and narrow minded they are being. Really ? Better inform nature it's system is broken then. Ive never understood why its OK to compliment a women on an attractive face, mostly not to compliment her on her boobs or bum. Theyre both simply cosmetic parts of the anatomy. Some people are blessed in some areas, others in other areas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eight Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 What a waste of time. I do like the placard the burd on the left has. 'Women not sex objects'. Eh - sorry - but women are sex objects. That is their entire point in the survival of the species. That is their ultimate point in existance. Why are these people usually very stupid ? I got into a lot of trouble at school once. We were talking about pornography - the question being "Do you think women are degraded by pornography?" To which I replied "Women are pornography." It didn't go down too well, I can tell you. eight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccc Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Ive never understood why its OK to compliment a women on an attractive face, mostly not to compliment her on her boobs or bum. Theyre both simply cosmetic parts of the anatomy. Some people are blessed in some areas, others in other areas. Thats a good point. I suppose one is seen as being rude and the other not ? Although, no matter what they say, no bird minds being complimented on any part of their body. Ever. I got into a lot of trouble at school once. We were talking about pornography - the question being "Do you think women are degraded by pornography?" To which I replied "Women are pornography." It didn't go down too well, I can tell you. eight I bet you got a good belting for that. Ooh err missus. Anyway you know what is another very interesting aspect of this subject ? The degradation bit. Many women get off on being degraded. Many positively love it. However it is always seen as a 'negative' thing. When it clearly is not - all of the time anyway. In these places it is the blokes being degraded if anything. Bird prances about on top of you - whilst actually doing very little for 5 minutes = £20 That works out at £240 per hour. That is up there with ******ing Lawyers ! Yet they are being degraded ?! Give me a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eight Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 Anyway you know what is another very interesting aspect of this subject ? The degradation bit. Many women get off on being degraded. Many positively love it. However it is always seen as a 'negative' thing. When it clearly is not - all of the time anyway. I might get ripped a new one for saying this, but I reckon that this type of objectification of women is actually empowering for them, in its own way. eight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blobloblob Posted June 6, 2011 Share Posted June 6, 2011 What's SWP? Shaun Wright Phillips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinker Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 In my inbox today... MEN ARE USELESS is a brilliant website that specialises in essentials and other things you 'forget to remember' and if you like this gift box they also offer auto delivery essentials in special boxes that fit through your letter boxes." As marketing can treat women as 'sex objects', marketing can treat men as 'idiots'. Which is better? Only one way to find out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number79 Posted June 9, 2011 Share Posted June 9, 2011 Our bodies not for sale? PMSL, those ugly fkers couldnt give it away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.