Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
cashinmattress

Liberal State Council Push To Force Elderly Out Of Homes

Recommended Posts

link

ELDERLY residents should not be forced to give up their homes to make way for units if a policy proposal to be discussed at next week's Liberal State Council gains momentum, community housing advocates say.

The state motion, to be brought before the council next weekend, suggests older residents who occupy large blocks of land should subdivide their large blocks in exchange for a new unit within their original piece of land.

Residents could be forced from their homes to live in a unit a fraction of the size, on their old block of land, under the motion.

Community Housing Federation of Victoria spokesman Steve Staikos said no one should be forced to move if the measure was taken up by the Government and became policy.

"I would urge all delegates to remember that these are actually people we’re talking about. People who have been in their homes for many years and probably do not want to go," he said.

Mr Staikos said the idea of taking away people’s backyards to create more housing was questionable, because it could leave less family homes for future tenants.

"Community Housing Federation of Victoria believes that every person deserves long term security of tenure, especially older members of our community in social housing already battling with cost-of-living pressures and aging related health problems."

Council on the Ageing CEO Sue Hendy said the potential policy was insensitive to elderly residents and "not a good idea ... This sounds like a way to shoehorn people into smaller places to create more land," she said.

Ms Hendy said many older public housing residents had lived in their homes for decades, and relied on the support of their neighbours and local friends.

She said while the proposal suggested residents still live on the same site, a unit would not be suitable for people who looked after their grandchildren or had family visiting.

Any policy like this would be a concern for the elderly, who would feel they had no choice but to agree or face being moved to another neighbourhood where they had less support, she said.

The motion will discuss "the potential level of interest amongst older people with existing large blocks of land to further subdivide their large blocks of land in exchange for the 'free' acquirement of a new unit within their original piece of land".

Two years ago, the Herald Sun revealed pensioners were being forced from homes they had lived in for decades so the former Brumby government could cash in on their rising value.

Hampton great-grandmother June Smith, 73, was allowed to continue living in her public housing home after she publicly complained about being ousted from her home of 36 years.

"I'd be very disappointed if this started happening again," she said.

"Particularly for older people I think it's appalling. I know the housing situation is terrible but there's got to be something better than what they're proposing.

"People would have to get rid of all their furniture to squeeze into a unit and they wouldn't be able to have their grandchildren over."

A Government spokeswoman yesterday said: "As part of an ongoing review of the older stock program, the Coalition Government is looking at better ways to utilise older stock more effectively."

Hmm. Why not? Oldies don't need huge tracts of land.

This applies to state housing, but why not push it to private housing as well, through punitive taxation?

Will such policy in the commonwealth abroad catch the interest of our government?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

link

Hmm. Why not? Oldies don't need huge tracts of land.

This applies to state housing, but why not push it to private housing as well, through punitive taxation?

Will such policy in the commonwealth abroad catch the interest of our government?

Hope you remember saying this when you are in your 70s or 80s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope you remember saying this when you are in your 70s or 80s.

State housing is a privilege, not a right.

Tenure must not be assured, and your lodgings need to match your current living requirements.

What's wrong with that?

It's not like they're doing this:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not like they're doing this:

LMAO! What a naff film. I can recall the marketing for that in the 70s, wanting to go and see it but being far too young and not being allowed in. I can remember my disappointment. It makes Diagnosis Murder look scary! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

link

Hmm. Why not? Oldies don't need huge tracts of land.

This applies to state housing, but why not push it to private housing as well, through punitive taxation?

Will such policy in the commonwealth abroad catch the interest of our government?

Looks like a scam for some sleaze ball in local government to sell to his developer mates for a large kick back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 312 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.