Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Game_Over

Bbc Name Ryan Giggs

Recommended Posts

Much to my surprise

The BBC, together with other news media have now reported Parliamentary proceedings in which Ryan Giggs was named as the footballer who is the subject of the recent super injunction court case.

:blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much to my surprise

The BBC, together with other news media have now reported Parliamentary proceedings in which Ryan Giggs was named as the footballer who is the subject of the recent super injunction court case.

:blink:

I wonder if Ryan Giggs will get a refund on his 100k legal fees. I doubt it very much!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet there are a few rich folk hiding behind super injunctions cursing Ryan Giggs.

Shitting a brick, the lot of em.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if Ryan Giggs will get a refund on his 100k legal fees. I doubt it very much!

Wouldn't have thought that would bother him much, given that he earns £100K+ a week minimum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet there are a few rich folk hiding behind super injunctions cursing Ryan Giggs.

Shitting a brick, the lot of em.

I do hope so.

And I also hope a few High Court judges are tearing at their wigs.

:blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It took a little longer for this to implode, now we have to hope that those deserving cases which need to be exposed are.

There might be a handful of injunctions that are right but the majority are clearly about suppression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a farce. As he was cuddling his kids on the pitch the other day, did he believe there was a single person in the crowd who did not know he had been banging an ex-Big Brother media whore?

What a thicko.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other's have all been named openly on the internet so powerful people are beginning to wakeup.

The fact that the legal profession has managed to ignore the power of the internet for so long is what amazes me. This morning on the BBC news they had an interview with Heather Brooke the FOI campaigner. The interviewer was trying to make out that the law doesn't need to have a common consensus for it to have to be obeyed.

It appears that a certain element of the establishment are living in a cosy bubble in which they can control everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the people who named him on Twitter could indeed be sued and shouldn't take overly comfort in numbers in my opinion. If anything it should be easy as there is an irrefutable record of their words, date stamped, time stamped and IP stamped. The Recording Association Of America along with the FBI for example, took drastic action against thousands of illegal downloaders who used Torrents (remember those) to download music and films; fear took care of the rest. Now only an idiot would attempt to use these. Any Legal firm worth their salt could issue any number of doe subpoenas to find out the information if the law has been broken.

The Internet is not anonymous. Far from it. And people should stop divorcing what they do online with real life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the people who named him on Twitter could indeed be sued and shouldn't take overly comfort in numbers in my opinion. If anything it should be easy as there is an irrefutable record of their words, date stamped, time stamped and IP stamped. The Recording Association Of America along with the FBI for example, took drastic action against thousands of illegal downloaders who used Torrents (remember those) to download music and films; fear took care of the rest. Now only an idiot would attempt to use these. Any Legal firm worth their salt could issue any number of doe subpoenas to find out the information if the law has been broken.

The Internet is not anonymous. Far from it. And people should stop divorcing what they do online with real life.

An IP address does not define a person. The login/pass aspect is harder to argue thought

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the people who named him on Twitter could indeed be sued and shouldn't take overly comfort in numbers in my opinion. If anything it should be easy as there is an irrefutable record of their words, date stamped, time stamped and IP stamped. The Recording Association Of America along with the FBI for example, took drastic action against thousands of illegal downloaders who used Torrents (remember those) to download music and films; fear took care of the rest. Now only an idiot would attempt to use these. Any Legal firm worth their salt could issue any number of doe subpoenas to find out the information if the law has been broken.

The Internet is not anonymous. Far from it. And people should stop divorcing what they do online with real life.

There is annominity in numbers, yes everything is logged but imagine the court time if it's all contested.

Do you want murderers and rapists tried or gossips? Pick one.

However if you want to be uber careful twitter from internet cafe's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is annominity in numbers, yes everything is logged but imagine the court time if it's all contested.

Do you want murderers and rapists tried or gossips? Pick one.

However if you want to be uber careful twitter from internet cafe's.

If you did murder someone involved in one of these injunctions, you wouldn't be allowed to own up to it if you wanted to <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Judgement is Here

Seems the judge concluded there was in fact an attempt by Thomas to blackmail him or spill all to the press.

Fair doo's he should have kept his old chap in his trousers and because he didn't and portrays a family image deserves everything he gets.

On the other hand if there has been an attempt to blackmail then the police should be investigating this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He might have banged Imogen Thomas, and who can blame him! He still scored this cracker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An IP address does not define a person. The login/pass aspect is harder to argue thought

RCIAA would not agree with you. Their Twitter account as you mention would identify, most have their photos on Twtitter for example or they send from their Blackberry. You can almost certainly get the persons home address, it's not difficult.

There is annominity in numbers, yes everything is logged but imagine the court time if it's all contested.

Do you want murderers and rapists tried or gossips? Pick one.

However if you want to be uber careful twitter from internet cafe's.

Again, didn't stop RIAA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the people who named him on Twitter could indeed be sued and shouldn't take overly comfort in numbers in my opinion. If anything it should be easy as there is an irrefutable record of their words, date stamped, time stamped and IP stamped. The Recording Association Of America along with the FBI for example, took drastic action against thousands of illegal downloaders who used Torrents (remember those) to download music and films; fear took care of the rest. Now only an idiot would attempt to use these. Any Legal firm worth their salt could issue any number of doe subpoenas to find out the information if the law has been broken.

The Internet is not anonymous. Far from it. And people should stop divorcing what they do online with real life.

It can easily be annonymous if you take a little bit of trouble to cover your tracks.

And torrents etc are still as widely available and used as they always were

So I'm afraid your dream of a police state is fading into the distance

:blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RCIAA would not agree with you. Their Twitter account as you mention would identify, most have their photos on Twtitter for example or they send from their Blackberry. You can almost certainly get the persons home address, it's not difficult.

"I lent my phone to a someone I met in a pub to make a call, I must have not signed out of Twitter- No, your honour I can't remember their name"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the people who named him on Twitter could indeed be sued and shouldn't take overly comfort in numbers in my opinion. If anything it should be easy as there is an irrefutable record of their words, date stamped, time stamped and IP stamped. The Recording Association Of America along with the FBI for example, took drastic action against thousands of illegal downloaders who used Torrents (remember those) to download music and films; fear took care of the rest. Now only an idiot would attempt to use these. Any Legal firm worth their salt could issue any number of doe subpoenas to find out the information if the law has been broken.

The Internet is not anonymous. Far from it. And people should stop divorcing what they do online with real life.

Some people don't scare so easy. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can easily be annonymous if you take a little bit of trouble to cover your tracks.

And torrents etc are still as widely available and used as they always were

So I'm afraid your dream of a police state is fading into the distance

:blink:

Okay I'll call that bluff, like what? Please don't say proxy server.

If you think the Internet is anonymous you really are deluding yourself GO. I think it all depends how aggressive they want to be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 312 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.