Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

interestrateripoff

Teacher Who Had Sex With Schoolboy, 15, Is Spared Jail After Judge Says: 'he Touched You First'

Recommended Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363858/Teacher-Leah-Davies-29-sex-schoolboy-15-spared-jail-judge.html

A young schoolmistress who had a fling with a boy nearly half her age went free today after a judge ruled the boy made the first move and had not been ‘corrupted’ by their illicit affair.

Teaching assistant Leah Davies, 29, slept with the 15-year-old after they watched a DVD together and drank vodka during a sleepover party.

Miss Davies, of Fallowfield, Manchester, had been earlier invited over to his family home by the boy's mother after the two women struck up a close friendship.

But at the end of the evening the boy's mother went to bed leaving Miss Davies alone with the teenager.

Now who on here thinks if it had been a male teacher and the girl had made the first move that the same judgement would have been made? I'd have added this to the other long thread on this but couldn't find it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely an odd decision, a male teacher would be signing the register, after his release. Its a bit like those anti domestic violence campaigns. The one that I remeber most was the Zero tolerance campaign, one of their slogans went along the lines of "Violence against women is unacceptable." An unarguable point, but presumably no one involved understood the implicit message of their campaign was that violence against men was acceptable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Teaching assistant Leah Davies, 29, slept with the 15-year-old after they watched a DVD together and drank vodka during a sleepover party.

Dear god, all that's missing is some 70s porno music in the background.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not and it never can be.A male can't be raped by a female he has to want it. Lucky boy.

Having sex with a minor is illegal, irrespective of whether they want to or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The outcome of this type of case seems to entirely depend upon the mood the judge is in on the day.

There needs to be a clearer set of rules for judging this and anonymity for the accused given the effect this sort of case has on their career prospects.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having sex with a minor is illegal, irrespective of whether they want to or not.

Exactly.

A male teacher would be accused of taking advantage of a minor's naivety. So it's not about whether the minor wanted sex or not, it's not comparable to an adult rape case. The point is in years to come the victim may look back on this and realise his teacher abused a position of trust.

The boys mother invited the teacher into her home. I wonder what she thinks about it all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not and it never can be.A male can't be raped by a female he has to want it. Lucky boy.

Is there a 100% correlation between a man physically being able to have sex and him giving his consent (i.e. being psychologically willing)?

At my age, the memory is rather dim, but don't teenage boys have a hard on about half the time? In other words, it's not hard (er, difficult) for some males to be physically able just about any time... Not sure that should represent consent. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a 100% correlation between a man physically being able to have sex and him giving his consent (i.e. being psychologically willing)?

At my age, the memory is rather dim, but don't teenage boys have a hard on about half the time? In other words, it's not hard (er, difficult) for some males to be physically able just about any time... Not sure that should represent consent. ;)

The concept of a young man being psychologically harmed by having a sh*g is a pretty weird concept to me.I would suggest that if he is so harmed then he has already undergone some kind of damaging process,probably by the God-bothering fraternity.Maybe the control should be a naked Anne Widdicombe.Let's see how many young shavers could still raise a cheer if confronted by that horny old reptile.(Horny as in leathery-skinned)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The concept of a young man being psychologically harmed by having a sh*g is a pretty weird concept to me.I would suggest that if he is so harmed then he has already undergone some kind of damaging process,probably by the God-bothering fraternity.Maybe the control should be a naked Anne Widdicombe.Let's see how many young shavers could still raise a cheer if confronted by that horny old reptile.(Horny as in leathery-skinned)

Do you think that a young man can't be psychologically harmed by a sexual encounter (presumably because he's a bloke, right, and all blokes love having sex with... well anyone?), but a young woman can be psychologically harmed (because, well, sugar and spice and all things nice! 'Nuff said)? :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think that a young man can't be psychologically harmed by a sexual encounter (presumably because he's a bloke, right, and all blokes love having sex with... well anyone?), but a young woman can be psychologically harmed (because, well, sugar and spice and all things nice! 'Nuff said)? :blink:

Yes I do think that,although not for the reasons that you give.The male does the chasing,that's why.The female in all civilised societies declines or accepts the advances of a potential suitor.The male may also decline these advances but if he is sexually aroused he is potentially a willing partner.The idea of a female persuading him to perform against his will is,quite frankly,preposterous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I do think that,although not for the reasons that you give.The male does the chasing,that's why.The female in all civilised societies declines or accepts the advances of a potential suitor.The male may also decline these advances but if he is sexually aroused he is potentially a willing partner.The idea of a female persuading him to perform against his will is,quite frankly,preposterous.

Fair enough. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sentence speaks to the character of the Judge. Anyone checked his PC?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 312 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.