Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  

Us Retail Sales Rise Despite Severe Weather

Recommended Posts


US retail sales rose in January for the seventh consecutive month, although the increase was below expectations.

Retail sales rose by 0.3%, less than analysts' expectations of a 0.6% increase, as extreme weather in large parts of the country kept some shoppers at home.

On an annual basis retail sales were up 7.8% from January 2010.

The Commerce Department also revised down December's increase to 0.5%, from an initial estimate of 0.6%.

Economists had been hoping for a bigger boost in sales as January was the first month that consumers had more money to spend following a social security tax cut.

Are these actual sales or cash value of the sales? If it's cash value then sales volumes could be down and price inflation has given the illusion of growth...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Are these actual sales or cash value of the sales? If it's cash value then sales volumes could be down and price inflation has given the illusion of growth...

Exactly. John Lewis sales last week were 1.1% higher but add VAT at 2.5% and other inflationary pressures then sales volume were down.

If there's one thing the elite hate it's deflation, but with mystic Merv watching pay rises like a hawk (bar banksters), I doubt there'll be any retail bonanza for the UK.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Well well....

The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for January, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $381.6 billion, an increase of 0.3 percent (±0.5%)* from the previous month, and 7.8 percent (±0.7%) above January 2010. Total sales for the November 2010 through January 2011 period were up 7.6 percent (±0.5%) from the same period a year ago. The November to December 2010 percent change was revised from +0.6 percent (±0.5%) to +0.5 percent (±0.3%).

Expectations were for 0.6%, so that's a hell of a miss. Oh, and note the revision - so from the unrevised, the number was 0.2, not 0.3.

We got some issues here in the detail table...... and I don't like it.

Why did I highlight the areas I did? Primarily because ex-seasonal adjustments these areas are trending the wrong way, and few are trending the right way. You can argue with the seasonal adjustments if you want; I personally don't believe a lot of them, but that's water under the dam when both adjusted and unadjusted numbers agree.

The other issue here, and potentially the most-serious one, is that the payroll tax cut took effect in January. So we should have seen that in retail sales, and yet we didn't. The entire premise of people "feeling better" or "more wealthy" was that cutting the payroll tax on the employee side would result in an immediate spending boost.

It didn't happen.

We appear to be getting to the point now of negative returns. That is, further stimulus measures don't stimulate. This is exactly what I expected to happen in 2007, in that the reason we hit the wall was due to excessive debt - not excess production as in a common inventory recession. Prodding people to spend beyond their means doesn't work in a debt-led recession because they're already deep into the hole and eventually people stop digging. Sadly for many if not most Americans they stop digging when the hole collapses on them and they're buried, to some extent because of the inane and outrageously dishonest "reporting" that one finds in the mainstream media (which of course only exists because you buy things - that is, advertising supports their operations.) To those who argue that the media should do things differently, I will simply observe that this is similar to arguing that a rattlesnake should not bite. It does, however, simply because it's a snake. Expecting different behavior from the snake is illogical.

The equity markets thus far have gone along with the story that we can shift, for some unknown period of time, debt creation and acceptance from the private sector to government, and by doing continue to put up good economic numbers. This report, along with continuing comments on margin squeezes out of various firms during the 4Q earnings releases, makes pretty clear that my macro view that I've been espousing since August of 2010 or thereabout is going to show up right about when I expected it to, or between now and the second quarter of 2011.

I expected the markets to start discounting this reality in the fall. They instead decided to pay attention to Bernanke and his puerile vomit about how "QE2" would save us. Well, if it was going to save us, would someone tell me where it's supposed to show up? QE2 as a percentage of the economic was about 4.2%, so if we had 2% organic growth then we should be putting up 6% numbers on GDP. We're not; we are in fact putting up negative numbers when one subtracts out the QE2 component, and the so-called "stimulant" effect of the payroll tax cut is a big zero as well, despite adding nearly $500 billion to the deficit this year alone. When debt accumulation becomes negative to economic outcomes you're in big trouble and I believe there's an argument to be made that we're either there or damn close.

Eventually this dynamic forces you to stop and take your medicine.

Coming into an environment where the most-recent stimulative tax cuts didn't stimulate, this is likely to bring us some interesting economic releases. My expectations are for serious profit declines which should become apparently in the first quarter reports and lead to a full-on profit collapse by the end of 2011. Exactly how long the markets will ignore these realities is difficult to determine, but I will say this: If you've made some nice money in the stock market on the back of so-called recovery, your "use by" date has expired and in my view you're now living on borrowed time.

Dennigers view on this.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 312 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?

      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.