Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Scott Sando

"leaked" Illumicorp Nwo Initiate Welcome Video

Recommended Posts

I don't think the all-powerful, world dominant Illuminati would allow this on Youtube. Having said that, if they did, I'm sure they'd up the production values a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so glad to be British. Had this been a yank forum there would be 15 pages by now of gullible fools spouting bible verses and talking about kicking the devils ar5e.

Yep, absolute rubbish made purely for the yank market of fluoridated bible wavers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those who believe that major world events result from planning are laughed at for

believing in the "conspiracy theory of history." Of course, no one in this modern day and age really

believes in the conspiracy theory of history — except those who have taken the time to

study the subject. When you think about it, there are really only two theories of history.

Either things happen by accident neither planned nor caused by anybody, or they happen

because they are planned and somebody causes them to happen. In reality, it is the

accidental theory of history preached in the unhallowed Halls of Ivy which should be

ridiculed. Otherwise, why does every recent administration make the same mistakes as

the previous ones? Why do they repeat the errors of the past which produce inflation,

depressions and war? Why does our government "stumble" from one world government aiding

"blunder" to another? If you believe it is all an accident or the result of mysterious

and unexplainable tides of history, you will be regarded as an "intellectual" who

understands that we live in a complex world. If you believe that all of the

consecutive coincidences over the past forty years stretches the law of averages a bit, you

are a kook!

Why is it that virtually all "reputable" scholars and mass media columnists and

commentators reject the cause and effect or conspiratorial theory of history? Primarily,

most scholars follow the crowd in the academic world just as most women follow fashion

Why is it that virtually all "reputable" scholars and mass media columnists and commentators

reject the cause and effect or conspiratorial theory of history? Primarily, most scholars

follow the crowd in the academic world just as most women follow fashions. To buck the

tide means social and professional ostracism. The same is true of the mass media. While

professors and pontificators profess to be tolerant and broadminded, in practice it's

strictly a one way street-with all traffic flowing left. A Maoist can be tolerated by

Liberals of Ivory Towerland or by the Establishment's media pundits, but to be a

conspiracy theorist who propounds a conspiratorial view, is absolutely

verboten. Secondly, these people have over the years acquired a strong vested emotional interest in

their own errors. Their intellects and egos are totally committed to the accidental theory.

Most people are highly reluctant to admit that they have been conned or have shown poor

judgment. To inspect the evidence of the existence of a conspiracy guiding our political

destiny from behind the scenes would force many of these people to repudiate a lifetime

of accumulated opinions. It takes a person with strong character indeed to face the facts

and admit he has been wrong even if it was because he was uninformed. .

Politicians and "intellectuals" are attracted to the concept that events are propelled by

some mysterious tide of history or happen by accident. By this reasoning they hope to

escape the blame when things go wrong.

Most intellectuals, pseudo and otherwise, deal with the conspiratorial theory of history

simply by ignoring it. They never attempt to refute the evidence. It can't be refuted. If and

when the silent treatment doesn't work, these "objective" scholars and mass media

opinion molders resort to personal attacks, ridicule and satire. The personal attacks tend

to divert attention from the facts which an author or speaker is trying to expose. The idea

is to force the person exposing the conspiracy to stop the exposure and spend his time and

effort defending himself.

However, the most effective weapons used against the conspiratorial theory of history are

ridicule and satire. These extremely potent weapons can be cleverly used to avoid any

honest attempt at refuting the facts. After all, nobody likes to be made fun of. Rather than

be ridiculed most people will keep quiet; and, this subject certainly does lend itself to

ridicule and satire. One technique which can be used is to expand the conspiracy to the

extent it becomes absurd. For instance, our man from the Halls of Poison Ivy might say in

a scoffingly arrogant tone, "I suppose you believe every elitist gets a telegram

each morning from conspiracy headquarters containing his orders for the day's

brainwashing of his students?" Some conspiratorialists do indeed overdraw the picture by

expanding the conspiracy (from the small clique which it is) to include every local kneejerk

liberal activist and government bureaucrat. Or, because of racial or religious bigotry,

they will take small fragments of legitimate evidence and expand them into a conclusion

that will support their particular prejudice, i.e., the conspiracy is totally "Jewish,"

"Catholic," or "Masonic". These people do not help to expose the conspiracy, but, sadly

play into the hands of those who want the public to believe that all conspiratorialists are

screwballs.

"Intellectuals" are fond of mouthing cliches like "The conspiracy theory is often

tempting. However, it is overly simplistic." To ascribe absolutely everything that happens

to the machinations of a small group of power hungry conspirators is overly simplistic.

But, in our opinion nothing is more simplistic than doggedly holding onto the accidental

view of major world events.

In most cases people simply accuse all those who discuss the conspiracy of being

paranoid. "Ah, you right wingers," they say, "rustling every bush, kicking over every

rock, looking for imaginary boogeymen." Then comes the coup de grace-labeling the

conspiratorial theory as the "devil theory of history." The people love that one. Even

though it is an empty phrase, it sounds so sophisticated!

With the leaders of the academic and communications world assuming this sneering

attitude towards the conspiratorial (or cause and effect) theory of history, it is not

surprising that millions of innocent and well-meaning people, in a natural desire not to

appear naive, assume the attitudes and repeat the cliches of the opinion makers. These

persons, in their attempt to appear sophisticated, assume their mentors' air of smug

superiority even though they themselves have not spent five minutes in study on the

subject of international conspiracy.

oh by the way, I know the video isn't a insider vid, but I still think its interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You didnt mention any quangos, or think tanks though. Examining their behind the scenes roles like the benign sounding Chatham House or Council for Foreign Relations and then looking at how you have a member of the BoE is also a member of the CFR for example.

Good points made re defending one self when the attack dogs come out et al, but until hard evidence can be produced you will never win the war.

I'll ask you one thing though, its acknowledge that non democractic authority needs to be applied by virtue of the fact all parents apply authoritarianism when bring up their kids. Why is the concept so disgusting to conspiracy theorists?

Likewise with the aim for a one world or NWO what is so wrong with that?

Sure some of the ways agendas are forced through might be unpalatable like Iraq or Afghanistan, or the way Tunisia is spreading to Egypt and then the wider region but if its common aim is otherwise good and beneficial why do peoples fear of change get in the way? Lets face it on a local or national level we dont have much influence over the way things run now anyway becuase there are too many interested parties, pulling all in different directions.

The reason authoritarianism is appled to kids is because they have unsound judgement due to lack of experience, what you are doing is preparing them for the day when they can break free and live for themselves on their own judgement. No one would claim that your parents can tell you what to do when you leave home.

Hey its not perfect, some will do better then others, but its far better then the state control where all children will be pumped out of the same mold.

The NWO will be based on centralization and elite control a NWO based on decentralization and freedom would be a good thing, but as we see from the docs that get released the elite consider us children who can never grow up and apply our own judgement.

The fight is on and it isn't right VS left because they are the same, the political fight is between total control and freedom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 312 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.