Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Scott Sando

Establishment Ignores Violent Rhetoric From Eco-Leftists

Recommended Posts

Establishment Ignores Violent Rhetoric From Eco-Leftists

Blowing up children and threatening climate change skeptics with physical violence barely merits a mention

Paul Joseph Watson

Prison Planet

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

While the establishment has invoked the supposed threat of vitriolic “right-wing rhetoric” as a tool with which to bludgeon freedom of speech in response to the Tucson shootings, it has conspired to sweep under the carpet far more extreme and threatening language and images used by leftists in the context of the climate change debate, rhetoric that has led directly to crimes and murders.

While Sarah Palin is castigated for using an image of crosshairs targeting political districts, leftists produce violent and bloody films that depict children being liquidated in an orgy of blood and guts for not toeing the line on the political dogma of man-made global warming.

When the 10:10 campaign put out a video that showed kids in a classroom being murdered by their teacher for refusing to lower their CO2 emissions, it sparked outrage amongst conservative bloggers, yet hardly a ripple was registered on the pages of the Washington Post, the New York Times, or any of the leftist blogs now erroneously trying to blame vitriolic “right-wing” rhetoric for Jared Lee Loughner’s massacre.

Similarly, there was no condemnation when a lobbying group used an image of a dead girl being hanged to push their propaganda about melting icebergs – and in fact the Discovery Channel gave the group an award for the commercial.

Kiddie eco-snuff rhetoric was also employed by ABC Australia in an online kids game in which children were told when to kill themselves based on their carbon consumption.

ABC’s Planet Slayer website featured a cartoon series, complete with a tool called “Prof Schpinkee’s Greenhouse Calculator” to help kids work out their carbon footprint.

The calculator also estimates at what age a person should die so they don’t use more than their fair share of the Earth’s resources. If users were found to have used too much CO2, they were portrayed as an exploding pig, leaving behind a pool of blood and gore.

Man-made climate change skeptics have also been threatened with physical violence by global warming alarmists on numerous occasions.

- Last year, an article carried by the official Greenpeace website written by a Greenpeace member urges climate activists to resort to criminal activity in an effort to reinvigorate momentum for their stalling global warming agenda, while ominously threatening climate skeptics, “we know where you live”.

- In June 2009, a global warming activist posted an article on the Talking Points Memo website entitled “At What Point Do We Jail Or Execute Global Warming Deniers?”

- Shortly after this article was retracted, a comment traced back to another prominent global warming activist which appeared on the Climate Progress blog threatened Skeptics that “an entire generation that will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds.” Website owner Joe Romm defended the comment as “clearly not a threat but a prediction”.

- During the Whole Life Expo 2010, a global warming alarmist working as security at the event tried to intimidate a skeptic by telling him, “Do you think it would be ******ing funny if I punched you in the face?”

- A July 2007 Senate report detailed how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation, including physical threats, intellectual purges, and threats to livelihoods and careers.

Despite the overwhelming number of examples of leftists using vitriolic rhetoric, bloody images and violent intimidation to push their political message on global warming, and despite the fact that extremists like Discovery Channel building gunman James Jay Lee, as well as child killers Francisco Lotero and Miriam Coletti, cited that rhetoric as a direct motivation for their crimes, there was no call to “tone down the rhetoric” from the establishment in the aftermath.

Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has constantly invoked the role of “right-wing rhetoric” in the tragic Tucson murders this past weekend as a smokescreen to distract from his own office’s failure to react to death threats made by shooter Jared Lee Loughner before the massacre. We now know that Dupnik was aware of Loughner’s bizarre and intimidating behavior before the shootings, as well as numerous death threats he had made.

While there isn’t a shred of evidence that Jared Lee Loughner’s rampage was prompted by anything other than his deranged mental illness, when gunman James Jay Lee took hostages he was acting on violent leftist rhetoric about the need to kill humans to save planet earth. As soon as the establishment media and the leftist blogs discovered that Lee did not fit into the mould of a right-wing tea partier, and in fact was one of their own, they dropped the story like a hot potato. There was no debate about “toning down the rhetoric,” and the 10:10 video of kids being murdered was released just over a month later.

Isn’t it interesting that the establishment only demands we “tone down the rhetoric” when that rhetoric manifests itself as criticism of the state? Meanwhile, leftists are free to continue with their far more threatening and violent rhetoric with barely a murmur of discontent amongst their allies in the corporate press.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the one thing this sorry saga, just like the Bristol landlord story has exposed is the MSMs insatiable obsession with pinning the blame on their enemies, be they Conservatives, or, in the Bristol case, of white males who dont fit into their definition of whats normal.

Personally i dont care for any of this 'inciting hatred' mumbo jumbo. People let themselves be incited, you cant incite people. If you could, if it was that easy, Osama and his buddies would have top paying jobs in marketing departments in top companies. If the mad mullahs actually incited everyone, we would have thousands of suicide bombers in the UK, not just one or two, same with the so called political 'vitriol'

The actual information about this case that has been released would barely fill a page. His youtube stuff was barely a couple of sentences, and yet the media seems to have made thousands of pages of baseless speculations. Most personal blogs seem to have behaved more responsibly than the MSM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the one thing this sorry saga, just like the Bristol landlord story has exposed is the MSMs insatiable obsession with pinning the blame on their enemies, be they Conservatives, or, in the Bristol case, of white males who dont fit into their definition of whats normal.

Personally i dont care for any of this 'inciting hatred' mumbo jumbo. People let themselves be incited, you cant incite people. If you could, if it was that easy, Osama and his buddies would have top paying jobs in marketing departments in top companies. If the mad mullahs actually incited everyone, we would have thousands of suicide bombers in the UK, not just one or two, same with the so called political 'vitriol'

The actual information about this case that has been released would barely fill a page. His youtube stuff was barely a couple of sentences, and yet the media seems to have made thousands of pages of baseless speculations. Most personal blogs seem to have behaved more responsibly than the MSM.

Thats a real good point, I felt pretty sorry for that guy in Bristol, the msm had his face plastered everywhere even before the any trial. The msm should be band from publicising names until the sentence has been announced

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a real good point, I felt pretty sorry for that guy in Bristol, the msm had his face plastered everywhere even before the any trial. The msm should be band from publicising names until the sentence has been announced

I thought they were... Surely the only time they can plaster it about is when there is little or no chance of indictment even? I would assume that over the next 6 months he will be raking in the slander compo unless they were telling the truth...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't one of the tabloids do that to Colin Stagg, so convinced they were (from talking to the police) that he was guilty? They basically invited him to sue. Which IIRC he then did, once the real killer got sent down. :lol:

I also seem to recall that Barry "Bulsara" George's conviction rested on the prosecution saying it had to be him because they had looked far and wide and there were no other suspects.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that climate change is a left-wing theory, what about plate-tectonics? I'm not sure whether that's left-wing or right-wing, and I have a dinner party coming up.

How about molecular orbital theory?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that climate change is a left-wing theory, what about plate-tectonics? I'm not sure whether that's left-wing or right-wing, and I have a dinner party coming up.

How about molecular orbital theory?

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Irena Sendler

There recently was the death of a 98 year-old lady named Irena. During WWII, Irena got permission to work in the Warsaw Ghetto, as a Plumbing/Sewer specialist. She had an 'ulterior motive' .. She KNEW what the Nazi's plans were for the Jews (being German). Irena smuggled infants out in the bottom of the tool box she carried, and she carried in the back of her truck a burlap sack (for larger kids). She also had a dog in the back that she trained to bark when the Nazi soldiers let her in and out of the ghetto. The soldiers of course wanted nothing to do with the dog and the barking covered the kids/infants noises. During her time of doing this, she managed to smuggle out and save 2500 kids/infants. She was caught, and the Nazi's broke both her legs and arms and beat her severely.

Irena kept a record of the names of all the kids she smuggled out and kept them in a glass jar, buried under a tree in her back yard. After the war, she tried to locate any parents that may have survived and reunited the family. Most had been gassed. Those kids she helped get placed into foster family homes or adopted.

Irena was up for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007...... She was not selected..

Al Gore won, for a slide show on Global Warming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt

http://tamino.wordpress.com/2011/01/02/hottest-year/

Hmmm.. solar minimum, strong la Nina, record high temperatures. Just lucky, I suppose. Nothing to see here, move along..

Why , when they are throwing ever more money at the climate con , are more and more weather stations closing?

Let me guess , it's because these stations did not fit into the global warming con (IE temps there were getting colder and not warmer) remove the stations reporting colder than average temps = increasing average.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/06/weather-stations-disappearing-worldwide/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 312 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.