Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Recommended Posts

Pure Blighty Scummers

George Osborne hit out at a system which allowed a single out-of-work household to claim benefits amounting to the tax bills of 16 working families put together.

One such tribe is that of jobless Pete and Sam Smith and their ten children - who rake in an astonishing £95,000 a year in benefits and stand to lose 70% of their income. While the average working family pay for housing and bills from their hard-earned wages, the Smiths get to live in a rent free four-bedroom house in Kingswood, Bristol.

They even have breakfast delivered to the door each morning courtesy of the taxpayer. Yet they claim their accommodation is 'cramped' and the food is not good enough.

Mr Smith, 40, left the Army in 2001 to care for his now 36-year-old wife, who has curvature of the spine. At the time they had three children - they now have ten aged from four months to 14 years.

The average family household income is nearly £35,000 a year - on which around £6,000 tax would be paid. The Smiths are given 16 times this figure in benefits.

The Chancellor announced that no household will receive more than the average national income - £25,000 - in benefits.

That 70% cut in income is something Mrs Smith cannot bear to think about. 'It's not really that much money we get,' she said of her current handouts.

This epitomises all that is wrong with the handout, fvckwit, socialist state nest we've made ourselves.

Meet the scummers...

joblesscouple1_203x150.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 267
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Mr Smith, 40, left the Army in 2001 to care for his now 36-year-old wife, who has curvature of the spine.

He looked after her good and proper. Maybe the amount of children is a consequence of him trying to straighten the curvature of her spine with his rod.

Child benefit will come in handy though.

Edited by Bosh
Link to post
Share on other sites

"The Chancellor announced that no household will receive more than the average national income - £25,000 - in benefits."

and yet...to limit Child Benefits to those families earning over £42K was going to be too fracking difficult.

just how are they going to apportion the benefits cut to this family?

no housing?, full council tax?...they are clearly earning over £42K...so no CB?

How?...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Smith, 40, left the Army in 2001 to care for his now 36-year-old wife, who has curvature of the spine.

He looked after her good and proper. Maybe the amount of children is a consequence of him trying to straighten the curvature of her spine with his rod.

Child benefit will come in handy though.

:D:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get that to be approx. 1/100th of a penny PER CHILD from each of us.

If this upsets you in any way whatsoever you really have some sort of psychological problem.

I'm guessing at imbecility.

When you put it like that, yeah, it's nothing.

In fact I can afford to give a whole penny per year for each of those children, let's up their benefits to £9,500,000 per year

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I get that to be approx. 1/100th of a penny PER CHILD from each of us.

Multiply by one million (ludicrous guesswork) and you start talking money. Add to that children who are raised in households that teach that living at the expense of the benefit system is a desirable way of life and after two generations you have a problem. Actually, we do have a problem. Now!

Edited by _w_
Link to post
Share on other sites

I get that to be approx. 1/100th of a penny PER CHILD from each of us.

If this upsets you in any way whatsoever you really have some sort of psychological problem.

I'm guessing at imbecility.

1/100 of a penny is fine.

£90K Gross FOC is not.

A friend of ours has curvature of the spine, she has daily pain...and works full time in an office job...

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should conscript this 'Brown's Brood' and ship them off to Afganistan.

And these are the scum (majority) that breed, dumbing down the masses, debasing the DNA database.

Sigh.

Tbh its all environmental rather than genetic, at a minimum it takes 100's of generations for a long lived mammal such as us to breed in traits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Put all those kids into care. That will save us all a lot of money. Throw the parents into jail, save some more.

you dont think £2000 a week more than covers their everyday living costs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The money is no big deal and now that they have a whole tribe to support then they need the money. It is only the kids that are going to suffer.

As for the pair of them, total scum imo. Irresponsible scum. If they could not provide for the kids that they had and provide them with a descent life then they never should have bought more into the world. Selfish and thoughtless idiots.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 417 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.