Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
SarahBell

How To Earn A Few Quid For A Minutes Work

Recommended Posts

Are you for real!?

Fact remains those women who NEED a sperm donor, can't get laid. They can't get laid because of a reason.

This is the real world. It's how it's always been. Only the strongest, healthiest and people with good genes are MEANT to survive.

Yes, I am for real. But I'm beginning to suspect you're a cartoon. Tw@t E Coyote, perhaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So cut OAP benefits, disabled benefits etc?

Saves tons of money, especially if you stop pensions and let people starve.

Don't forget to ****** that crip Stephen Hawking off, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So cut OAP benefits, disabled benefits etc?

Saves tons of money, especially if you stop pensions and let people starve.

Erm, was this in reference to my post? You've absolutely lost me...

Who said anything about not looking after our pensioners and people with disabilities? Some people need to learn to read.

Perhaps you ignorant souls should actually read some books written by the wonderful Stephen Hawking and about natural selection and evolution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm, was this in reference to my post? You've absolutely lost me...

Who said anything about not looking after our pensioners and people with disabilities? Some people need to learn to read.

Perhaps you ignorant souls should actually read some books written by the wonderful Stephen Hawking and about natural selection and evolution.

You said:

Only the strongest, healthiest and people with good genes are MEANT to survive.

Which means once you have lost the ability to reproduce (that's why you want them to have good genes) they are no longer needed by society.

I could have suggested compulsory sterilisation at birth and IQ tests, genetic test and financial statements being required before breeding allowed.

But once people are not fit to breed you don't need them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You said:

Only the strongest, healthiest and people with good genes are MEANT to survive.

Which means once you have lost the ability to reproduce (that's why you want them to have good genes) they are no longer needed by society.

I could have suggested compulsory sterilisation at birth and IQ tests, genetic test and financial statements being required before breeding allowed.

But once people are not fit to breed you don't need them.

Now you think it's clever to take my post out of it's original context!

What I originally said has nothing to do with how people with good or bad genes fit into our society. Of course everyone has a role they can play in society. Look at Stephen Hawkings (as he has been mentioned) and how debilitated he is and how much he has contributed to our society!

But fact remains, that through the natural process of evolution, only those with the best genes survive and are MEANT to reproduce. I'm not trying to be offensive in my personal opinion with regards to sperm donors. I just don't think it's right to interfere with future generations. There is generally a reason why people can't or don't reproduce the natural way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is generally a reason why people can't or don't reproduce the natural way.

Maybe they have caught something which has damaged their reproductive system.

Maybe they are just a bit old, having been bombarded with the lie that having a career is somehow superior to having children.

Maybe they don't like the thought of some dick***d Frank Butcher lookalike slobbering over them and would prefer to spend their time with another woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the real world. It's how it's always been. Only the strongest, healthiest and people with good genes are MEANT to survive.

Not sure if this is just sloppy wording, but it would be a fundamental misunderstanding to think natural selection has a goal or a purpose. MEANT doesn't come into it.

And trying to apply principles from nature to the affairs of man isn't going to get you far. By popular consent we've moved beyond that.

I do agree that people should read up on evolution etc. Prof Dawkins classic 'The Selfish Gene' is a good start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm?....let me think? there's no anonymity so 16 years hence some spotty faced disgruntled teen turns up on my doorstep with 'issues' and a bunch of questions or worse yet someone like Harriet 'Hatemen' forces through legislation that means I have to pony up and contribute financially for the upbringing of these children.

Oh go on then! Where do I sign up?

You've hit the nail on the head, singlemalt. The number of sperm donors dropped dramatically when the identity law was passed by NuLab and everyone could see that this was obviously going to be the outcome except, apparently, ministers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is just sloppy wording, but it would be a fundamental misunderstanding to think natural selection has a goal or a purpose. MEANT doesn't come into it.

And trying to apply principles from nature to the affairs of man isn't going to get you far. By popular consent we've moved beyond that.

I do agree that people should read up on evolution etc. Prof Dawkins classic 'The Selfish Gene' is a good start.

Quite. There were welfare systems in "primitive" societies too - there had to be. Natural selection is so misunderstood. It tells us _nothing_ about how we ought to live.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(They have just upped the limit on the number of times a man can donate)

:)

What,.. they've put something in the nations water supply ?

Or maybe they use this approach now...... I can tell you I saw a TV doco where they upped the amount of times a Gorilla could donate.

They rendered him unconcious with anaesthetic and stimulated his prostate with a vibrating ******** probe until he donated 4 times.

:blink::blink::blink::blink:

I have edited this because they wont let me use a scientific word relating to an orifice. What if I call it an arsehole ? that might work.

or not.

Edited by bricor mortis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Financial freedom is achieved when your passive monthly income streams exceed your monthly outgoings.

If you had 1000 income streams paying £2 each month, most of you could retire now.

1. A Positve cashflow BTL

2. A share/fund that pays a dividend

3. A blog that has adsense/affliates

4. A royalty from a book/film/other intellectual property

5. A automated online business/website that sells ebooks/software

6. A business that works for you that pays you an income (you're a sleeping partner)

7. A multi-level marketing business that pays you royalities/income

8. Trading that takes a few minutes per week

.... only 9992 more ideas to go.

Or you could just use one idea, 1000 times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the radio today they have been talking about paying sperm donors the same as women who donate eggs.

Red herring, innit? Nothing is already the same as nothing. Better to charge them (both) for it - maybe 18 years worth of child benefit payments would be a fair minimum.

But shouldn't you be on the dating thread if you're obliquely seeking a servicing? <_<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Removal of anonymity blew it all apart so they have to offer cash to get any interest.

If there is no anonymity then why give my time to a cup?

I will donate free to any hot chicks that ask ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you for real!?

Fact remains those women who NEED a sperm donor, can't get laid. They can't get laid because of a reason.

This is the real world. It's how it's always been. Only the strongest, healthiest and people with good genes are MEANT to survive.

Retard.

What about couples where she is perfectly fertile?

The vast majority using places like this are couples and if they need a sperm donor then it isn't her fault is it?

Did you even read that through before hitting enter?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is generally a reason why people can't or don't reproduce the natural way.

and what pray tell is this "general reason" then if you would not mind sharing your medical expertise with us?

Also, would you mind if I pass the answer onto the rest of the medical profession since the normal fertility specialists still have no idea why some ordinarily fit and healthy couples can't conceive naturally?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just googled Famous Ginger scientists" and Famous Ginger Engineers" and Famous Ginger Inventors".

It's not looking good.....

;)

Didn't look very hard did you :)

beeker.jpg

Edited by gilf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to stickup for askfrank... if a woman is fertile and her man isn't then she should get another man (or the sperm of another man). Natural Selection should be respected for the good of the race. you only have to look at the greater proportion of state supported career breeders and the consequences. Go to Asda in Telford and tell me that the integrity if our genes as a species isn't being unwound and this is only after 3 generations of state sponsorship, scary and definitely devolution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How did it take so long for this thread to deteriorate ? :D

I nearly started it that way but decided calling the thread "w*nk your way to prosperity" was a bit vulgar. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 259 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.