Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  
DisQ

Osborne Plans 25% Treasury Staff Cuts From Ft

Recommended Posts

From the website, headline on front page

here's the start of winter of discontent

extract

George Osborne is planning to cut staff numbers at the Treasury by about one-quarter and scale back his department’s role as he attempts to lead by example in the search for sweeping spending cuts across Whitehall.

The chancellor will reconvene the public spending “star chamber” this week and hopes to settle a number of departmental budgets – including justice, transport, environment and culture – by mid-September.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have seen a massive U-turn on the "Bonfire of the Quangoes" which suggests that the government job cuts may not materialise. Some re-packaging and other creative schemes* are no doubt being busily worked out as we type.

_______________________

*Such as "early retiremnt" with massive golden handshakes, job sharing schemes, immediate rehiring as quasi-government employees, or simply misrepresenting the numbers and burying the evidence under a pile of Sir Humphrey.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Duplicate

That's one of the "creative" methods I forgot to include in my suggested list.

No outright sackings, just gradual attrition as you hope someone retires sooner than the usual date.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's one of the "creative" methods I forgot to include in my suggested list.

No outright sackings, just gradual attrition as you hope someone retires sooner than the usual date.

The hope is more mandarins die in office. There must be more front line services they can cut instead, or doctors and nurses?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does reducing the role of the Treasury mean less input to policy decisions and less scrutiny of the consequences of decisios taken?

In other words, does it leave Osbourne free to make policy on a wing and a prayer?

No change there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard the jobs will be reduced by not replacing retirees over four years rather than sacking people.

Will those retirees be the ones that are no longer forced to retire but will have to keep working because of the ridiculous cost of living ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard the jobs will be reduced by not replacing retirees over four years rather than sacking people.

That would be a perfectly sensible way for HMG (or any employer) to reduce number.

Unfortunately, it isn't going to achieve anything like a 25% cut in numbers.

tim

Edited by tim123

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

turn out to be a bit of a damp squib, a bit of PR stunt.

He aims to chop a quarter of the Treasury workforce, reducing staff from about 1,350 to 1,000 in three years by natural wastage rather than redundancies. At the same time, Mr Osborne wants to reverse what he regarded as “empire building” under Gordon Brown that extended the Treasury's activities into other Whitehall departments.

Mr Osborne is even asking his staff to sit at smaller desks so more people can be squeezed into his HQ, saving rents.

The Chancellor's willingness to lock in spending reductions in his own building is designed to strengthen his hand in negotiations with other government departments, which reach the final formal stages this week.

Mr Osborne's star chamber will sit in judgment on ministers who claim they cannot find cuts without causing excessive damage to services or to the Government's political fortunes.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23872394-george-osborne-shows-way-by-firing-350-treasury-staff.do

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Osborne is even asking his staff to sit at smaller desks so more people can be squeezed into his HQ, saving rents.

Why? Is he planning on recruiting 500 contractors to replace them?

Natural wastage is not the answer, the most able and mobile have the highest turnover along with the lowest paid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 191 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.