Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Laura

Blair Must Be Prosecuted.

Recommended Posts

& who would disagree with him? - Not that it will ever happen; unless the majority switch off the X-factor & have a eureka moment

http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=583

Tony Blair must be prosecuted, not indulged like his mentor Peter Mandelson. Both have produced self-serving memoirs for which they have been paid fortunes. Blair’s will appear next month and earn him £4.6 million. Now consider Britain’s Proceeds of Crime Act. Blair conspired in and executed an unprovoked war of aggression against a defenceless country, which the Nuremberg judges in 1946 described as the “paramount war crime”. This has caused, according to scholarly studies, the deaths of more than a million people, a figure that exceeds the Fordham University estimate of deaths in the Rwandan genocide.

In addition, four million Iraqis have been forced to flee their homes and a majority of children have descended into malnutrition and trauma. Cancer rates near the cities of Fallujah, Najaf and Basra (the latter “liberated” by the British) are now revealed as higher than those at Hiroshima. “UK forces used about 1.9 metric tons of depleted uranium ammunition in the Iraq war in 2003,” the Defence Secretary Liam Fox told parliament on 22 July. A range of toxic “anti-personnel” weapons, such as cluster bombs, was employed by British and American forces.

Such carnage was justified with lies that have been repeatedly exposed. On 29 January 2003, Blair told parliament, “We do know of links between al-Qaida and Iraq …”. Last month, the former head of the intelligence service, MI5, Eliza Manningham-Buller, told the Chilcot inquiry, “There is no credible intelligence to suggest that connection … [it was the invasion] that gave Osama bin Laden his Iraqi jihad”. Asked to what extent the invasion exacerbated the threat to Britain from terrorism, she replied, “Substantially”. The bombings in London on 7 July 2005 were a direct consequence of Blair’s actions.

Documents released by the High Court show that Blair allowed British citizens to be abducted and tortured. The then foreign secretary, Jack Straw, decided in January 2002 that Guantanamo was the “best way” to ensure UK nationals were “securely held”.

Instead of remorse, Blair has demonstrated a voracious and secretive greed. Since stepping down as prime minister in 2007, he has accumulated an estimated £20 million, much of it as a result of his ties with the Bush administration. The House f Commons Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, which vets jobs taken by former ministers, was pressured not to make public Blair’s “consultancy” deals with the Kuwaiti royal family and the South Korean oil giant UI Energy Corporation. He gets £2 million a year “advising” the American investment bank J P Morgan and undisclosed sums from financial services companies. He makes millions from speeches, including reportedly £200,000 for one speech in China.

In his unpaid but expenses-rich role as the West’s “peace envoy” in the Middle East, Blair is, in effect, a voice of Israel, which awarded him a $1 million “peace prize”. In other words, his wealth has grown rapidly since he launched, with George W. Bush, the bloodbath in Iraq.

His collaborators are numerous. The Cabinet in March 2003 knew a great deal about the conspiracy to attack Iraq. Jack Straw, later appointed “justice secretary”, suppressed the relevant Cabinet minutes in defiance of an order by the Information Commissioner to release them. Most of those now running for the Labour Party leadership supported Blair’s epic crime, rising as one to salute his final appearance in the Commons. As foreign secretary, David Miliband, sought to cover Britain’s complicity in torture, and promoted Iran as the next “threat”.

Journalists who once fawned on Blair as “mystical” and amplified his vainglorious bids now pretend they were his critics all along. As for the media’s gulling of the public, only the Observer’s David Rose, to his great credit, has apologised. The Wikileaks’ exposes, released with a moral objective of truth with justice, have been bracing for a public force-fed on complicit, lobby journalism. Verbose celebrity historians like Niall Ferguson, who rejoiced in Blair’s rejuvenation of “enlightened” imperialism, remain silent on the “moral truancy”, as Pankaj Mishra wrote, “of [those] paid to intelligently interpret the contemporary world”.

Is it wishful thinking that Blair will be collared? Just as the Cameron government understands the “threat” of a law that makes Britain a risky stopover for Israeli war criminals, a similar risk awaits Blair in a number of countries and jurisdictions, at least of being apprehended and questioned. He is now Britain’s Kissinger, who has long planned his travel outside the United States with the care of a fugitive.

Two recent events add weight to this. On 15 June, the International Criminal Court made the landmark decision of adding aggression to its list of war crimes to be prosecuted. This is defined as a “crime committed by a political or military leader which by its character, gravity and scale constituted a manifest violation of the [united Nations] Charter”. International lawyers described this as a “giant leap”. Britain is a signatory to the Rome statute that created the court and is bound by its decisions.

On 21 July, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, standing at the Commons despatch box, declared the invasion of Iraq illegal. For all the later “clarification” that he was speaking personally, he had made “a statement that the international court would be interested in”, said Philippe Sands, professor of international law at University College London.

Tony Blair came from Britain’s upper middle classes who, having rejoiced in his unctuous ascendancy, might now reflect on the principles of right and wrong they require of their own children. The suffering of the children of Iraq will remain a spectre haunting Britain while Blair remains free to profit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before this deservedly disappears to off-topic, I have to say Blairs legacy was simply two wars and bankrupting the country.

Quite an achievement, and all with a smile.

After he was no longer PM, I think it was at Yale that Blair said something in a speech along the lines of

"I think that the good economy we enjoyed was more down to lucky circumstances than judgement"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before this deservedly disappears to off-topic, I have to say Blairs legacy was simply two wars and bankrupting the country.

Quite an achievement, and all with a smile.

Three smiles, if you count his wife.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before this deservedly disappears to off-topic, .

Not like you to be so judgemental VMR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It won't happen until there's a public clamour. The chances of that happening reduce by the day as we the general public have goldfish memories. Given that he's unlikely to face justice this time around, fingers crossed that there's something in this "Karma" malarky!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a religous man, however i sometimes wish it were all true, just so when i do go to hell i can see tony blair recieving the punishment he deserves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something that cheered me up no end today. Blairs memoirs already reduced to half price in WH Smith's :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really agree with some of Pilger's reasons, but I do wonder what it would take for a PM or former PM, or government cabinet, to be called to account for decisions and policies made under their tenure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something that cheered me up no end today. Blairs memoirs already reduced to half price in WH Smith's :lol:

The paper from his book would not be good enough to wipe my **** after a hot curry. Vile money grabbing excuse for a human being.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The paper from his book would not be good enough to wipe my **** after a hot curry. Vile money grabbing excuse for a human being.

Why be kind? You know he's a lot worse than that. Mendacious, murdering scum that would be have been seen as a disgrace by the Third Reich. After all, they stated their reason to invade Poland.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much as I'd love to see him hang, I'm not sure what they'd actually get Teflon Tony on. The war actually was legal (probably) in that him and Dubbya got the UN to agree to the invasion and all. They may not have realised what they'd agreed to at the time but they really did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not a religous man, however i sometimes wish it were all true, just so when i do go to hell i can see tony blair recieving the punishment he deserves.

Maybe that's why he turned Catholic.... he thinks he can get away with a couple of Hail Mary's after confession......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much as I'd love to see him hang, I'm not sure what they'd actually get Teflon Tony on. The war actually was legal (probably) in that him and Dubbya got the UN to agree to the invasion and all. They may not have realised what they'd agreed to at the time but they really did.

I think fabricating / distorting evidence could go down as treason.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pilger's knife wielding brand of surgical journalism is a refreshing antidote to the mainstream media.

Murdoch et al beware!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think fabricating / distorting evidence could go down as treason.....

But how can you prove he wasn't acting in good faith? Bear in mind the standards of evidence required for a trial for treason are somewhat more stingent than those used to invade Iraq.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

£4.6 million from his memoirs.

thats an awful lot of books...Id be surprised if they sold 10,000...and that mainly to journos and nulab prison guards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But how can you prove he wasn't acting in good faith?

yes but who's faith?

not church of england.....therefore not in accordance with the queen or her oath.

no secret where his allegiances lie when you figure out why he was attempting to flog off northern ireland and gibraltar.

he's got faith alright,but those standing in opposition to it are collateral damage as far as he is concerned.

the end justifies the means.....so now you have the lowdown on how viscious,petty and spiteful these people are.....and they won't take no for an answer.

he belongs to the christofascist al quaeda........still fascism,but wearing a different colour frock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much as I'd love to see him hang, I'm not sure what they'd actually get Teflon Tony on. The war actually was legal (probably) in that him and Dubbya got the UN to agree to the invasion and all. They may not have realised what they'd agreed to at the time but they really did.

murder is a crime....no matter how you dress it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say Blairs legacy was simply two wars and bankrupting the country.

Quite an achievement, and all with a smile.

But you forget something: he's absolutely LOVED... by MILLIONS... of americans...

rolleyes.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but who's faith?

not church of england.....therefore not in accordance with the queen or her oath.

no secret where his allegiances lie when you figure out why he was attempting to flog off northern ireland and gibraltar.

he's got faith alright,but those standing in opposition to it are collateral damage as far as he is concerned.

the end justifies the means.....so now you have the lowdown on how viscious,petty and spiteful these people are.....and they won't take no for an answer.

he belongs to the christofascist al quaeda........still fascism,but wearing a different colour frock.

Cheer up Oracle

The future's bright, the future'sorange150x150.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 259 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.