Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

George Osborne


Guest happy?

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
5
HOLA446

I don't think you understand.

All GDP is anyway is essentially a measure of what we buy.

So what if what we buy is 2% or even 3% less than what we bought last year?

However, you'd soon notice it if the world won't keep on lending us the money that allows us to pay for our food imports.

Besides, suppose the public sector shrinks by some 3% / year, and the private sector grows by 3% / year, the GDP growth will appear to be around zero, but an essential re-balancing of the economy will be taking place, preparing the ground for strong growth in the near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
Coalition budget 'has increased chance of double-dip recession'

They say it like it's a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448

Get on Board for the Double Dippers:

Apparently even the Office Of Brown-Nosing can't hide this one:

http://www.guardian....get-obr-warning

George Osborne's budget has increased the likelihood of a double-dip recession, the government's tax and spending watchdog told a powerful group of MPs today.Cuts in public spending and higher taxes will have cut the forecast for growth and "logically increased the possibility of a double dip", said Geoffrey Dicks, one of three officials at the Office for Budget Responsibility, at the first meeting of the Treasury select committee in the new parliament.

Jesus, what an idiot. We are borrowing 11% pa and we grow 3 or 4% pa, but it is called a recovery.

Now we take off those 11% so naturally we will grow -7% if nothing changes. But this is called a double dip ....

There was NO REAL recovery so there can be NO double dip ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449

Jesus, what an idiot. We are borrowing 11% pa and we grow 3 or 4% pa, but it is called a recovery.

Now we take off those 11% so naturally we will grow -7% if nothing changes. But this is called a double dip ....

There was NO REAL recovery so there can be NO double dip ...

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410

Besides, suppose the public sector shrinks by some 3% / year, and the private sector grows by 3% / year, the GDP growth will appear to be around zero, but an essential re-balancing of the economy will be taking place, preparing the ground for strong growth in the near future.

I would go a step further.

Until the public sector's proportional contribution to GDP shrinks by 5% per year for four consecutive years (taking its share from 50% to 40%, the economy will not be in a position to grow again in a sustainable manner no matter what happens to the private sector during this period of adjustment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10
HOLA4411

Now we take off those 11% so naturally we will grow -7% if nothing changes. But this is called a double dip ....

There was NO REAL recovery so there can be NO double dip ...

What you perhaps havent realised, is there was never any growth for the last decade, so therefore no dip or recovery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412

What you perhaps havent realised, is there was never any growth for the last decade, so therefore no dip or recovery.

+1 The last decade should be known as the "smoke and mirrors" decade. Any "growth" from debt creation and unsustainable public spending. I suspect there is some news and expectations management going on here, aka the budget cuts, but growth? Hmm we've not had any for yonks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414

People like Osbourne, Cameron and the rest are millionaires, they dont care if theres a double dip.

If they don't care and so rich why bother to become politicians. Much easier to lie on a beach all day and not have any aggro!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415

If they don't care and so rich why bother to become politicians. Much easier to lie on a beach all day and not have any aggro!

Because they want the power.

They want to be rich and powerful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416

Get on Board for the Double Dippers:

Apparently even the Office Of Brown-Nosing can't hide this one:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jul/13/double-dip-recession-budget-obr-warning

...one dimensional realisation in a three dimensional world....if Labour had stayed on we would be on the edge of the final smelt down with nobody ...not even the IMF able to help....as for some twit from the Mirror suggesting Gordo's Book unlike Mandelson and Blair's would most likely be on Economics ....what did Gordon Brown ever know about Economics ..?....what a myth ...and any suggestion the IMF may employ him would lead to the total destruction of world.... :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417

George Osborne's budget has increased the likelihood of a double-dip recession, the government's tax and spending watchdog told a powerful group of MPs today.Cuts in public spending and higher taxes will have cut the forecast for growth and "logically increased the possibility of a double dip", said Geoffrey Dicks, one of three officials at the Office for Budget Responsibility, at the first meeting of the Treasury select committee in the new parliament.

Jesus, what an idiot. We are borrowing 11% pa and we grow 3 or 4% pa, but it is called a recovery.

Now we take off those 11% so naturally we will grow -7% if nothing changes. But this is called a double dip ....

There was NO REAL recovery so there can be NO double dip ...

Good post. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418

Jesus, what an idiot. We are borrowing 11% pa and we grow 3 or 4% pa, but it is called a recovery.

Now we take off those 11% so naturally we will grow -7% if nothing changes. But this is called a double dip ....

There was NO REAL recovery so there can be NO double dip ...

Not really surprising, the Treasury fetishises GDP numbers and their OBR sidekick does too. When you only have a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421

Because they want the power.

They want to be rich and powerful.

So why are they pursuing policies likely to lose them the next election?

And what did Gordon Brown want?

on the other side Labour and Brown did it because they love us ....

Good answers ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424

I have a low opinion of pretty much all politicians, certainly the front bench ones anyway. You don't get to be front bencher without having plenty of power hunger and not many scruples, they are practically requirements for the job.

Hence why I generally think the government should fekk off, and the idea that government is some sort of saintly enterprise, We The People and all that, is ludicrous. Democracy is being dictated to by Ed Balls, Thatcher, Brownfinger, etcetera. Nothing saintly or morally superior about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information