Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

EUBanana

Laws Mk2

Recommended Posts

MPs' Expenses: Treasury chief David Laws, his secret lover and a £40,000 claim

The Cabinet minister charged with rescuing the Government’s finances has used taxpayers’ money to pay more than £40,000 to his long-term partner, The Daily Telegraph can disclose.

By Holly Watt and Robert Winnett

Published: 10:06PM BST 28 May 2010

David Laws and James Lundie Photo: GETTY/JULIAN SIMMONDS

David Laws, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, claimed up to £950 a month for eight years to rent rooms in two properties owned by his partner. The claims could be against parliamentary rules governing MPs’ second home expenses.

On Friday night, Mr Laws apologised and announced that he would “immediately” pay back tens of thousands of pounds claimed for rent and other housing costs between 2006 and 2009. He also referred himself to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner.

Related Articles

Claim for renting the spare room in partner's flat

David Laws profile: Lib Dem in Tory clothing

MPs' expenses: Alistair Darling's claim for help with his tax return

How the Telegraph investigation exposed the MPs' expenses scandal day by day

'Secret agenda to score adoptions'

MPs' expenses: Censorship ruins Gordon Brown's pledge over transparent government

Mr Laws said: “I regret this situation deeply, accept that I should not have claimed my expenses in this way and apologise fully.”

His controversial claims were not uncovered by an official inquiry into MPs’ expenses last year because Mr Laws did not admit that his landlord was also his long-standing lover.

The disclosure is the first big setback for the Coalition. Mr Laws, a Liberal Democrat, has the task of implementing public-sector cuts worth more than £6  billion.

He has already drawn up tough new rules limiting the pay and perks of hundreds of thousands of public sector workers. However, his hard-line approach could be undermined by the disclosure of his own controversial use of public money.

The Daily Telegraph’s Expenses Files show that between 2004 and 2007, Mr Laws claimed between £700 and £950 a month to sub-let a room in a flat in Kennington, south London. This flat was owned by the MP’s partner who was also registered as living at the property. The partner sold the flat for a profit of £193,000 in 2007.

In 2007, Mr Laws’s partner then bought another house nearby for £510,000. The MP then began claiming to rent the “second bedroom” in this property. His claims increased to £920 a month. The partner also lived at the property. Mr Laws’s main home is in his Yeovil constituency. The arrangement continued until September 2009, when parliamentary records show that Mr Laws switched his designated second home and began renting another flat at taxpayers’ expense. His partner remained at the Kennington house.

Mr Laws’s partner is James Lundie, who is thought to work for a lobbying firm. The Daily Telegraph was not intending to disclose Mr Laws’s sexuality, but in a statement issued in response to questions from this newspaper, the minister chose to disclose this fact.

“I’ve been involved in a relationship with James Lundie since around 2001 — about two years after first moving in with him. Our relationship has been unknown to both family and friends throughout that time,” it read.

“James and I are intensely private people. We made the decision to keep our relationship private and believed that was our right. Clearly that cannot now remain the case.

“My motivation throughout has not been to maximise profit but to simply protect our privacy and my wish not to reveal my sexuality.”

John Lyon, the Parliamentary Commissioner, will now have to scrutinise whether any rules have been broken.

Since 2006, parliamentary rules have banned MPs from “leasing accommodation from… a partner”.

Mr Laws said: “I claimed back the costs of sharing a home in Kennington with James from 2001 to June 2007. In June 2007, James bought a new home in London and I continued to claim back my share of the costs. I extended the mortgage on my Somerset property, for which I do not claim any allowances or expenses, to help James purchase the new property.

“In 2006 the Green Book rules were changed to prohibit payments to partners. At no point did I consider myself to be in breach of the rules which in 2009 defined partner as ‘one of a couple … who although not married to each-other or civil partners are living together and treat each-other as spouses’.

“Although we were living together we did not treat each other as spouses. For example we do not share bank accounts and indeed have separate social lives. However, I now accept that this was open to interpretation and will immediately pay back the costs of the rent and other housing costs I claimed from the time the rules changed until August 2009.”

Friends of Mr Laws said that the decision to disclose his sexuality was an “immense decision”.

“Anyone who knows David, knows he is someone of great integrity,” one friend said. “He has been very private about his life. But he absolutely wants the public to understand the reasons for this arrangement, it has not been about making a profit. He has decided he wants to be absolutely clear. His integrity is obviously very important.”

Mr Laws’s claims for a series of other expenses are also now expected to come under scrutiny. Between 2004 and 2008, he submitted regular claims, in rounded figures, for service and maintenance, repairs, utilities and other items.

He typically claimed between £50 and £150 a month for utilities and £100 to £200 for maintenance. Receipts were not provided to back up the claims.

However, in April 2008, the rules were changed and MPs had to provide receipts for any claims above £25. Mr Laws’s expense claims dropped sharply. For example, he claimed only £37 a month for utilities.

Mr Laws, a former investment banker who is said to be independently wealthy, has been an MP since 2001 and represents Lord Ashdown’s former constituency.

:rolleyes:

New boss, same as the old boss.

PS Couldn't care less about his sexuality, and I have some sympathy as I'm sure thats not easy to put in front of the spotligt - but it's the thieving that gets me, especially as he's already minted.

Especially sad coming from Laws, who I was thinking was on the side of the angels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:rolleyes:

New boss, same as the old boss.

PS Couldn't care less about his sexuality, and I have some sympathy as I'm sure thats not easy to put in front of the spotligt - but it's the thieving that gets me, especially as he's already minted.

Especially sad coming from Laws, who I was thinking was on the side of the angels.

I don't think thieving is the right word. I may be trying to give him the benefit of the doubt but perhaps he was, naively, just trying to hide the relationship?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I liked Laws too...I thought his performance against Darling was very good!

Rather dissapointed with this news! Not because he's gay...it's the expenses stuff! Like the OP pointed out, he's already minted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:(

Edit: Oh well, at lest he's a LibDem, not a Conservative.

Edit2: Of course, had he been a Conservative, the Telegraph possibly wouldn't have run the story, but someone would have done at some time in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
“I’ve been involved in a relationship with James Lundie since around 2001."
Mr Laws, a former investment banker who is said to be independently wealthy, has been an MP since 2001

Is this Lundie some kinda golddigger?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think thieving is the right word. I may be trying to give him the benefit of the doubt but perhaps he was, naively, just trying to hide the relationship?

he is supposedly a multimillionaire. If keeping the relationship and his sexuality private was paramount, why was he keeping quiet whilst claiming the rent in the first place ? Why not just pay your boyfriend £950 a month out of your own pocket. And do you really believe he was renting a room, no, he was paying most of his boyfriend's mortgage out of the public purse...

The answer's simple - he's playing the gay card to try to lessen the effect of the claims. Which is actually worse.

He didn't need the money, he knew it was in breach of the rules and he did it anyway......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he is supposedly a multimillionaire. If keeping the relationship and his sexuality private was paramount, why was he keeping quiet whilst claiming the rent in the first place ? Why not just pay your boyfriend £950 a month out of your own pocket. And do you really believe he was renting a room, no, he was paying most of his boyfriend's mortgage out of the public purse...

The answer's simple - he's playing the gay card to try to lessen the effect of the claims. Which is actually worse.

He didn't need the money, he knew it was in breach of the rules and he did it anyway......

Perhaps to somehow legitimise his partners income?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

got to go ..... its against even the (weak) rules

If he doesn't ....cameron will look hypercritical ... from his pre election stance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i feel really angry about this one. But i think it may also be extreme disappointment that NOTHING has changed. I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt but its too hard.

And the unreceipted utilities are unacceptable. If he didnt have time, thats what secretaries are for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it me or does David Laws look like he'd make a really good extra for a World War 2 film. He'd be really convincing in one of those uniforms. If he ever left politics he should get on the phone to Mr Tarantino for the sequel to Inglorious Basterds.

61kopqs.jpgDavidLawsMP.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest anorthosite

 Is it me or does David Laws look like he'd make a really good extra for a World War 2 film. He'd be really convincing in one of those uniforms. If he ever left politics he should get on the phone to Mr Tarantino for the sequel to Inglorious Basterds.

61kopqs.jpgDavidLawsMP.jpg

Godwin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he is supposedly a multimillionaire. If keeping the relationship and his sexuality private was paramount, why was he keeping quiet whilst claiming the rent in the first place ? Why not just pay your boyfriend £950 a month out of your own pocket. And do you really believe he was renting a room, no, he was paying most of his boyfriend's mortgage out of the public purse...

The answer's simple - he's playing the gay card to try to lessen the effect of the claims. Which is actually worse.

He didn't need the money, he knew it was in breach of the rules and he did it anyway......

+1

sack him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope he survives. If he had been open about the relationship he could have claimed much more as a second-home allowance so ultimately this story is just about outing someone against the public interest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it me or does David Laws look like he'd make a really good extra for a World War 2 film. He'd be really convincing in one of those uniforms. If he ever left politics he should get on the phone to Mr Tarantino for the sequel to Inglorious Basterds.

61kopqs.jpgDavidLawsMP.jpg

I really do expect better from you Mike.

This has played right into the BBC's current gameplay does anyone know who released this information, why has it only just come to light?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really do expect better from you Mike.

This has played right into the BBC's current gameplay does anyone know who released this information, why has it only just come to light?

+1

this must have been known about for a long time. My bet is the Tories kept it under their hat because they knew a hung parliament was on the cards and they wanted to be able to assasinate key libdems when it would do most damage.

On that basis, despite not liking sleazy politicians I'll let Laws off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • 152 Brexit, House prices and Summer 2020

    1. 1. Including the effects Brexit, where do you think average UK house prices will be relative to now in June 2020?


      • down 5% +
      • down 2.5%
      • Even
      • up 2.5%
      • up 5%



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.