Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Why Was The Bailout Good For Me?


Milton

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441

Why was the Bailout good for me?

I keep hearing, from various leading media figures, and politicians that the Bailout had to happen.

Phrases like; 'We had to have the bailout, otherwise it would have been like cutting off our nose to spite our faces.....'

I know that I have been forced to waste tens of thousands in rent. [Possibly six figures]

Not something that gets mentioned often, but I think a lot of people on here probably have feelings of despair, anger, worthlessness, knocks your confidence etc, [all suitably buried!] not being able to afford a bedsit for a decade.

Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc.

I think I would be leading a very different life. Probably a much better life.

[My Industry, manufacturing/Engineering, in the Petrochem/Pharma/Chem sector has suffered, and I have lost my job because of it.]

Im Living off my [meagre] savings, as are many others. Still paying taxes. [My money Going to the Banks]

So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me?

Edited by Dan1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444

...the Bailouts were bad for you as they are only delaying the real recession ...further debt does not solve debt...the pendulum is about to return....possibly for the last time... <_<

Ok. But how have the Bailouts helped me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4
HOLA445

Ok. But how have the Bailouts helped me?

...they have not...they have kept your government with pumping machines attempting to keep the bubble alive ...some think they have been helped ... HPC has been softened and restricted to pockets ...while the spending in the public sector has gone up to give you a feel good factor like a bag of sweets from the corner shop...just a temporary feeling of comfort...Gordo's tricky way.... <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446

Ok. But how have the Bailouts helped me?

Forget it. Late. Exhausted posting.......

I guess the media figures and politicians are not talking to me. They are talking to the people with mortgages.

They should state specifically, 'The bailouts are good for the people with mortgages. But completely shit for you Dan. Were just stealing your money Dan, to keep their houses artificialy inflated, and make sure you stay in debt bondage. Dont like that? Tough. W'ell send you to prison, unless you give us your money, so we can keep our house prices propped up"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448

Why was the Bailout good for me?

I keep hearing, from various leading media figures, and politicians that the Bailout had to happen.

Phrases like; 'We had to have the bailout, otherwise it would have been like cutting off our nose to spite our faces.....'

I know that I have been forced to waste tens of thousands in rent. [Possibly six figures]

Not something that gets mentioned often, but I think a lot of people on here probably have feelings of despair, anger, worthlessness, knocks your confidence etc, [all suitably buried!] not being able to afford a bedsit for a decade.

Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc.

I think I would be leading a very different life. Probably a much better life.

[My Industry, manufacturing/Engineering, in the Petrochem/Pharma/Chem sector has suffered, and I have lost my job because of it.]

Im Living off my [meagre] savings, as are many others. Still paying taxes. [My money Going to the Banks]

So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me?

It has permitted you to continue to live in the fourth richest nation in the world with all the power and responsibilities that come with that status.

The vast majority of adults in the UK have under Labour purchased a house, not something that can be said of the old boom to bust days of the do nothing Tories.

For sure there have been some like yourself that have lacked the confidence in the nation at the outset of the price corrections and have failed to get onto the housing ladder. But the vast majority of people have managed to get onto the housing ladder and are thankfull that Labour have created jobs in the public sector for those that unable to find a job in the less stable private sector that has caused a economic problem the world over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449

Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc.

In 1999 the house-price mania was still doing its stretching exercises and warming up for the big show...

homepage.png

So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me?

Have you got nominal savings in the banking system; do you still have them?

You seem to be complaining of the housing boom, more than the bailout.

I'm no supported of the bailout myself BTW, I think it should have been handled very differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411

It has permitted you to continue to live in the fourth richest nation in the world with all the power and responsibilities that come with that status.

The vast majority of adults in the UK have under Labour purchased a house, not something that can be said of the old boom to bust days of the do nothing Tories.

For sure there have been some like yourself that have lacked the confidence in the nation at the outset of the price corrections and have failed to get onto the housing ladder. But the vast majority of people have managed to get onto the housing ladder and are thankfull that Labour have created jobs in the public sector for those that unable to find a job in the less stable private sector that has caused a economic problem the world over.

Sometimes Laurejon you are just a bit too subtle in your sarcasm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
12
HOLA4413

I'd say unless you have more than £35,000 in stock investments or savings accounts you lost out on the bailout. At your expense people who are richer than you had their wealth saved.

Remember that the next time you hear a rich person crying about higher taxes. If it wasn't for the state stepping in, that rich person's wealth would have been gone, the system would have hit the reset button.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414

I'd say unless you have more than £35,000 in stock investments or savings accounts you lost out on the bailout. At your expense people who are richer than you had their wealth saved.

Remember that the next time you hear a rich person crying about higher taxes. If it wasn't for the state stepping in, that rich person's wealth would have been gone, the system would have hit the reset button.

Anyone who had substantial secured liabilities (which includes anyone with a mortgage with a LTV of 60% or higher)probably also benefitted from the bailout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415

I'd say unless you have more than £35,000 in stock investments or savings accounts you lost out on the bailout. At your expense people who are richer than you had their wealth saved.

Remember that the next time you hear a rich person crying about higher taxes. If it wasn't for the state stepping in, that rich person's wealth would have been gone, the system would have hit the reset button.

That's ok then, I feel so much more pleased for myself.

But seriously there is a big question about the role of the banks. The Banks almost have their own imaginary economy, salaries everything is inflated by direct cash infusion, meanwhile they don't do anything to create real wealth by advancing loans for good business ideas at reasonable rates.

Personally I believe the Government should just give everyone £100,000 and close the banks down and replace them with a free, publicly funded cash transfer system. Meanwhile they should confiscate all the assets of anyone who has ever worked for an investment bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416

That's ok then, I feel so much more pleased for myself.

But seriously there is a big question about the role of the banks. The Banks almost have their own imaginary economy, salaries everything is inflated by direct cash infusion, meanwhile they don't do anything to create real wealth by advancing loans for good business ideas at reasonable rates.

Personally I believe the Government should just give everyone £100,000 and close the banks down and replace them with a free, publicly funded cash transfer system. Meanwhile they should confiscate all the assets of anyone who has ever worked for an investment bank.

thats an idea.

however, we hear today the government cant buy, at great expense, a computer, with a printer, that can work out tax codes.

my £299 notebook, with excel and a £29 printer can do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422

surely it's obvious -

the unwashed had to have money taken off them to give to the banks, so that they could lend it back to them with interest, thus providing vital bonuses that trickle down - e.g. finding coins dropped in the street, dry cleaning old school ties, that kind of thing

come on - get with the programme, Tax N*****

learn to love the rimming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423

Why was the Bailout good for me?

I keep hearing, from various leading media figures, and politicians that the Bailout had to happen.

Phrases like; 'We had to have the bailout, otherwise it would have been like cutting off our nose to spite our faces.....'

I know that I have been forced to waste tens of thousands in rent. [Possibly six figures]

Not something that gets mentioned often, but I think a lot of people on here probably have feelings of despair, anger, worthlessness, knocks your confidence etc, [all suitably buried!] not being able to afford a bedsit for a decade.

Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc.

I think I would be leading a very different life. Probably a much better life.

[My Industry, manufacturing/Engineering, in the Petrochem/Pharma/Chem sector has suffered, and I have lost my job because of it.]

Im Living off my [meagre] savings, as are many others. Still paying taxes. [My money Going to the Banks]

So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me?

The bailouts are good for you because they protected your savings.

I'm going to expect howls of indignation now, people can't face up to the fact that the bailouts weren't there to protect an elite group of shadowy bankers, they mainly bailed out ordinary peoples' nest eggs. Like yours.

In the long run it would have been much cheaper to let it crash, but governments don't think like that, they prefer short termist solutions that keep them in power and expenses. So we've had to bail out the rich (well, the poor have had to bail out everyone)

Edited by chefdave
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424

The bailouts are good for you because they protected your savings.

I'm going to expect howls of indignation now, people can't face up to the fact that the bailouts weren't there to protect an elite group of shadowy bankers, they mainly bailed out ordinary peoples' nest eggs. Like yours.

In the long run it would have been much cheaper to let it crash, but governments don't think like that, they prefer short termist solutions that keep them in power and expenses. So we've had to bail out the rich.

exactly, alot dont seem to understand the primary reason for bailing was for savers, it doesnt change the fact it was a classic wealth redistribution to the better off but savers above the guarantee threshhold are the main beneficiaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

exactly, alot dont seem to understand the primary reason for bailing was for savers, it doesnt change the fact it was a classic wealth redistribution to the better off but savers above the guarantee threshhold are the main beneficiaries

thats great, they bailed the savers (NOT) then gave them below inflation interest.

some bailout.

clearly, the bailout cost nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information