Milton Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) Why was the Bailout good for me? I keep hearing, from various leading media figures, and politicians that the Bailout had to happen. Phrases like; 'We had to have the bailout, otherwise it would have been like cutting off our nose to spite our faces.....' I know that I have been forced to waste tens of thousands in rent. [Possibly six figures] Not something that gets mentioned often, but I think a lot of people on here probably have feelings of despair, anger, worthlessness, knocks your confidence etc, [all suitably buried!] not being able to afford a bedsit for a decade. Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc. I think I would be leading a very different life. Probably a much better life. [My Industry, manufacturing/Engineering, in the Petrochem/Pharma/Chem sector has suffered, and I have lost my job because of it.] Im Living off my [meagre] savings, as are many others. Still paying taxes. [My money Going to the Banks] So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me? Edited February 6, 2010 by Dan1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
200p Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 We as sheep should not be thinking or asking these questions of our masters. Follow, accept and obey. FAO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Lorne Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Why was the Bailout good for me? ...the Bailouts were bad for you as they are only delaying the real recession ...further debt does not solve debt...the pendulum is about to return....possibly for the last time... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milton Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 ...the Bailouts were bad for you as they are only delaying the real recession ...further debt does not solve debt...the pendulum is about to return....possibly for the last time... Ok. But how have the Bailouts helped me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Lorne Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Ok. But how have the Bailouts helped me? ...they have not...they have kept your government with pumping machines attempting to keep the bubble alive ...some think they have been helped ... HPC has been softened and restricted to pockets ...while the spending in the public sector has gone up to give you a feel good factor like a bag of sweets from the corner shop...just a temporary feeling of comfort...Gordo's tricky way.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milton Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 Ok. But how have the Bailouts helped me? Forget it. Late. Exhausted posting....... I guess the media figures and politicians are not talking to me. They are talking to the people with mortgages. They should state specifically, 'The bailouts are good for the people with mortgages. But completely shit for you Dan. Were just stealing your money Dan, to keep their houses artificialy inflated, and make sure you stay in debt bondage. Dont like that? Tough. W'ell send you to prison, unless you give us your money, so we can keep our house prices propped up" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhysling Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 It stopped any new banks from forming which is bad for me. They could have taken on deposits and had a good Tier 1 for lending and undercut the market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurejon Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Why was the Bailout good for me? I keep hearing, from various leading media figures, and politicians that the Bailout had to happen. Phrases like; 'We had to have the bailout, otherwise it would have been like cutting off our nose to spite our faces.....' I know that I have been forced to waste tens of thousands in rent. [Possibly six figures] Not something that gets mentioned often, but I think a lot of people on here probably have feelings of despair, anger, worthlessness, knocks your confidence etc, [all suitably buried!] not being able to afford a bedsit for a decade. Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc. I think I would be leading a very different life. Probably a much better life. [My Industry, manufacturing/Engineering, in the Petrochem/Pharma/Chem sector has suffered, and I have lost my job because of it.] Im Living off my [meagre] savings, as are many others. Still paying taxes. [My money Going to the Banks] So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me? It has permitted you to continue to live in the fourth richest nation in the world with all the power and responsibilities that come with that status. The vast majority of adults in the UK have under Labour purchased a house, not something that can be said of the old boom to bust days of the do nothing Tories. For sure there have been some like yourself that have lacked the confidence in the nation at the outset of the price corrections and have failed to get onto the housing ladder. But the vast majority of people have managed to get onto the housing ladder and are thankfull that Labour have created jobs in the public sector for those that unable to find a job in the less stable private sector that has caused a economic problem the world over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huw Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc. In 1999 the house-price mania was still doing its stretching exercises and warming up for the big show... So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me? Have you got nominal savings in the banking system; do you still have them? You seem to be complaining of the housing boom, more than the bailout. I'm no supported of the bailout myself BTW, I think it should have been handled very differently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misanthrope Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 It has permitted you to continue to live in the fourth richest nation in the world with all the power and responsibilities that come with that status. Take a look at this:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Woods? Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 It has permitted you to continue to live in the fourth richest nation in the world with all the power and responsibilities that come with that status. The vast majority of adults in the UK have under Labour purchased a house, not something that can be said of the old boom to bust days of the do nothing Tories. For sure there have been some like yourself that have lacked the confidence in the nation at the outset of the price corrections and have failed to get onto the housing ladder. But the vast majority of people have managed to get onto the housing ladder and are thankfull that Labour have created jobs in the public sector for those that unable to find a job in the less stable private sector that has caused a economic problem the world over. Sometimes Laurejon you are just a bit too subtle in your sarcasm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Misanthrope Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Sometimes Laurejon you are just a bit too subtle in your sarcasm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aa3 Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I'd say unless you have more than £35,000 in stock investments or savings accounts you lost out on the bailout. At your expense people who are richer than you had their wealth saved. Remember that the next time you hear a rich person crying about higher taxes. If it wasn't for the state stepping in, that rich person's wealth would have been gone, the system would have hit the reset button. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyOne Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I'd say unless you have more than £35,000 in stock investments or savings accounts you lost out on the bailout. At your expense people who are richer than you had their wealth saved. Remember that the next time you hear a rich person crying about higher taxes. If it wasn't for the state stepping in, that rich person's wealth would have been gone, the system would have hit the reset button. Anyone who had substantial secured liabilities (which includes anyone with a mortgage with a LTV of 60% or higher)probably also benefitted from the bailout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikhail Liebenstein Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 I'd say unless you have more than £35,000 in stock investments or savings accounts you lost out on the bailout. At your expense people who are richer than you had their wealth saved. Remember that the next time you hear a rich person crying about higher taxes. If it wasn't for the state stepping in, that rich person's wealth would have been gone, the system would have hit the reset button. That's ok then, I feel so much more pleased for myself. But seriously there is a big question about the role of the banks. The Banks almost have their own imaginary economy, salaries everything is inflated by direct cash infusion, meanwhile they don't do anything to create real wealth by advancing loans for good business ideas at reasonable rates. Personally I believe the Government should just give everyone £100,000 and close the banks down and replace them with a free, publicly funded cash transfer system. Meanwhile they should confiscate all the assets of anyone who has ever worked for an investment bank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 That's ok then, I feel so much more pleased for myself. But seriously there is a big question about the role of the banks. The Banks almost have their own imaginary economy, salaries everything is inflated by direct cash infusion, meanwhile they don't do anything to create real wealth by advancing loans for good business ideas at reasonable rates. Personally I believe the Government should just give everyone £100,000 and close the banks down and replace them with a free, publicly funded cash transfer system. Meanwhile they should confiscate all the assets of anyone who has ever worked for an investment bank. thats an idea. however, we hear today the government cant buy, at great expense, a computer, with a printer, that can work out tax codes. my £299 notebook, with excel and a £29 printer can do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Georgia O'Keeffe Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 thats an idea. however, we hear today the government cant buy, at great expense, a computer, with a printer, that can work out tax codes. my £299 notebook, with excel and a £29 printer can do that. it could be done for a few francs on a slide rule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyracantha Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Take a look at this:- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(PPP)_per_capita FFS we are behind Iceland! Will be interesting to see how the ratings change over the next few years. Interesting as in the old Chinese curse "May you live in interesting times". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 it could be done for a few francs on a slide rule yeah, but you cant print out the letter, demand and reminders on a slide rule im afraid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Once in a lifetime Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Why was the Bailout good for me? Do you still have a job ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrabus Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 it could be done for a few francs on a slide rule Slide Rule ! you are showing your age now. 90% of the people on this site will have never seen one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shedfish Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 surely it's obvious - the unwashed had to have money taken off them to give to the banks, so that they could lend it back to them with interest, thus providing vital bonuses that trickle down - e.g. finding coins dropped in the street, dry cleaning old school ties, that kind of thing come on - get with the programme, Tax N***** learn to love the rimming Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Authoritarian Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 (edited) Why was the Bailout good for me? I keep hearing, from various leading media figures, and politicians that the Bailout had to happen. Phrases like; 'We had to have the bailout, otherwise it would have been like cutting off our nose to spite our faces.....' I know that I have been forced to waste tens of thousands in rent. [Possibly six figures] Not something that gets mentioned often, but I think a lot of people on here probably have feelings of despair, anger, worthlessness, knocks your confidence etc, [all suitably buried!] not being able to afford a bedsit for a decade. Whereas I feel pretty confident in stating that if the Housing Bubble had not been allowed to inflate, I would have got a mortgage around 1999, and very probably paid off a large part of it by now. Had kids, a family, etc. etc. I think I would be leading a very different life. Probably a much better life. [My Industry, manufacturing/Engineering, in the Petrochem/Pharma/Chem sector has suffered, and I have lost my job because of it.] Im Living off my [meagre] savings, as are many others. Still paying taxes. [My money Going to the Banks] So, why were the Bank Bailouts good for me? The bailouts are good for you because they protected your savings. I'm going to expect howls of indignation now, people can't face up to the fact that the bailouts weren't there to protect an elite group of shadowy bankers, they mainly bailed out ordinary peoples' nest eggs. Like yours. In the long run it would have been much cheaper to let it crash, but governments don't think like that, they prefer short termist solutions that keep them in power and expenses. So we've had to bail out the rich (well, the poor have had to bail out everyone) Edited February 6, 2010 by chefdave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Georgia O'Keeffe Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 The bailouts are good for you because they protected your savings. I'm going to expect howls of indignation now, people can't face up to the fact that the bailouts weren't there to protect an elite group of shadowy bankers, they mainly bailed out ordinary peoples' nest eggs. Like yours. In the long run it would have been much cheaper to let it crash, but governments don't think like that, they prefer short termist solutions that keep them in power and expenses. So we've had to bail out the rich. exactly, alot dont seem to understand the primary reason for bailing was for savers, it doesnt change the fact it was a classic wealth redistribution to the better off but savers above the guarantee threshhold are the main beneficiaries Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Loo Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 exactly, alot dont seem to understand the primary reason for bailing was for savers, it doesnt change the fact it was a classic wealth redistribution to the better off but savers above the guarantee threshhold are the main beneficiaries thats great, they bailed the savers (NOT) then gave them below inflation interest. some bailout. clearly, the bailout cost nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.