Guest DissipatedYouthIsValuable Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Is mathematical consistency of a system, which only really works over time with an increasing population with increasing debt, worth keeping? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy_K Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 The system doesn't need increasing population, it just needs increasing debt. If that debt increased at the same rate as inflation, the system would work. Trouble is, it's increased much faster than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Injin Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Is mathematical consistency of a system, which only really works over time with an increasing population with increasing debt, worth keeping? Is it ******. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Sacks Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Is mathematical consistency of a system, which only really works over time with an increasing population with increasing debt, worth keeping? Makes me laugh when I hear politicians say "where will the money come from to do this/that/the other...", like it's some finite resource and not actually created in an instant. Apparently there is not enough money to feed starving millions in a world of food abundance yet there is plenty enough to treble house prices in ten years. So my answer to your question is yes. The monetary system is the barrier to human progress. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
interestrateripoff Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Isn't this more a question about keeping the giant squid alive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.