Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

"labours Lost It"


hedgefunded

Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
BBC webby at the moment

We're not done 'yet', insists Brown

http://news.bbc.co.uk/

Its only yet cos they havent had the vote yet.

Even the picture they used look like he's waving good bye

Useless foreign tosser he is.

no, he meant, they are not done totally fµcking up the country yet.

theres still ID cards and bio scares to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1
HOLA442
2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
Guest absolutezero
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sun_(newspaper)

The Sun goes Labour again

The Sun switched support to Labour on 18 March, 1997, six weeks before the landslide General Election victory which saw Labour leader Tony Blair become Prime Minister, despite attacking Blair and New Labour up to a month earlier. Its front page headline read THE SUN BACKS BLAIR and its front page editorial made clear that while it still had reservations about some of New Labour policies, such as the Minimum Wage and Devolution, it believed Blair to be "the breath of fresh air this great country needs."[26] John Major's Conservatives, it said, were "tired, divided and rudderless".[26] Blair, realising the influence the paper could have over its readers' political thinking, had "courted" it for some time by granting exclusive interviews and writing columns.

In exchange for Rupert Murdoch's support, Blair agreed not to join the European Exchange Rate Mechanism.[27] The paper has supported Labour in both the subsequent two elections, in 2001 and 2005, despite being a persistent critic of some of its policies, particularly on closer ties with Europe. It was argued that the 'Sun' backed New Labour at the 1997 General Election because it knew that the Conservatives had no chance of winning, and it had urged its readers to vote Conservative, afterwards it would have been seen as having backed a loser.

Your second paragraph says it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
6
HOLA447
7
HOLA448
Guest absolutezero
Tactical switching...

No switching at all.

They're just saying they're Tories now rather than claiming to support Labour but preaching the Tory message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
Its just people in power backing the winning horse.

They would support the BNP if they thought they would win.

In a nutshell, Murdoch and co back winners. They are cynical opportunists. It is important as it underlines Labours fall but it is not an endorsement of anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11
HOLA4412
No switching at all.

They're just saying they're Tories now rather than claiming to support Labour but preaching the Tory message.

ah but the plebs read it and it matters, whatever the motivations behind the scenes.

To be fair, after that absurd speech Brown deserves nothing less than oblivion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413
13
HOLA4414
14
HOLA4415
Brown and the Labour party are doomed but I doubt whether the Sun will be deciding matters.

Its circulation peaked at 4,889,118 in 1995 but by 2008 it had reduced to an average of 2,986,000 copies a day.

The days when it alone turned elections on its own is probably in the past.

Yeah, but when opinion polls are at 40 percent for the oppostion and 26 percent for you, and then The Sun turns on you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
16
HOLA4417
17
HOLA4418
18
HOLA4419
19
HOLA4420
Given it never really supported Labour anyway I'd not say it was significant.

So by announcing they are no longer supporting Labour this indicates to you that The Sun no longer surreptitiously fail to support the party who they explicitly backed, day after day after day, for 12years, in print?

What a crazy mixed up world we live in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421
21
HOLA4422
22
HOLA4423
23
HOLA4424
Where did you get that weird "u" from in f*cking?

and why does this site let us get away with changing one tiny thing in a swear word ?

Don't know about Fred but I usually get them from Word (the symbols).

Isn't fụck so much more powerful than feck?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information