Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

D.C.

Bliar Harping On About Religion Again In Cif

Recommended Posts

Bliar of course together with his criminal cronies Bush, Cheney and Rumsfield, were the gang who decided to illegally invade another sovereign state, Iraq, and perpetrate mass slaughter on the back of a series of lies, calumunies and obfuscations and sieze oil assets for their collective corporate interests.

Hypocrit!

Instead of preaching about religion, he ought properly to be trying to defend the indefensible from the dock of the International Courts of Justice as a War Criminal, under the aegis of the Nuremberg Principles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bliar of course together with his criminal cronies Bush, Cheney and Rumsfield, were the gang who decided to illegally invade another sovereign state, Iraq, and perpetrate mass slaughter on the back of a series of lies, calumunies and obfuscations and sieze oil assets for their collective corporate interests.

Hypocrit!

Instead of preaching about religion, he ought properly to be trying to defend the indefensible from the dock of the International Courts of Justice as a War Criminal, under the aegis of the Nuremberg Principles.

But what would Jesus have done??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest X-QUORK
Hypocrit!

That's a bit harsh. Religious observance is all about interpretation. In Blair's case he interpreted the Good Samaritan story to mean that God wanted him to unleash Shock And Awe on the people of Iraq.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DisposableHeroes
That's a bit harsh. Religious observance is all about interpretation. In Blair's case he interpreted the Good Samaritan story to mean that God wanted him to unleash Shock And Awe on the people of Iraq.

The American's were also very generous and helped sort out their daisy's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's a bit harsh. Religious observance is all about interpretation. In Blair's case he interpreted the Good Samaritan story to mean that God wanted him to unleash Shock And Awe on the people of Iraq.

What about the ten commandments?

A central pillar to both Judeaism and Christianity.

13 You shall not murder.

14 You shall not commit adultery.

15 You shall not steal.

16 You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor

Bush of course is a "Christian"........

:rolleyes:

Just like no doubt, Usama Bin Laden is a Muslim........

And Bliar and his gang are "Socialists".

Unfortunately in the real World where I live, just because some clever person decides to re-brand a Pork Chop and call it a Kipper, doesn't make it OK for strictly Kosher Jews to eat.

You took the Queen's Shilling, X.

Were you able to be selective about the bits of Queen's Regulations you decided to accord to?

And were QRs open to significant interpretation?

Nice if they were!

"I like the bit about being paid: I reject the bit about having to wear a uniform. Like the bit about three squares a day. Don't accept the bit about being shot at. And as for saluting officers...................!"

If you join then you adhere to the central planks of the rules.

If you can't or won't do this then don't join!

And that's one of British society's core troubles today: aided and abetted by a liberal PC meeja which is itself totally out of control, it wants to re-write everything and all social and ethical mores which seem to threaten their quaint and unrealistic concept of laissez faire behaviour and anything which allows self-satisfaction and gratuitous selfishness.

And most important of all, don't get up on your hind legs and bang on about something as if you are Mother Theresa reincarnated, when your track record is littered with malfeasances, calumnies, deception, duplicious double-dealing and the destruction singlehandedly of what Thatcher left of a once proud nation state!

To$$er Blair indeed!

:angry:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest X-QUORK
Were you able to be selective about the bits of Queen's Regulations you decided to accord to?

And were QRs open to significant interpretation?

Nice if they were!

Probably the tightest bit of law in the world. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   295 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.