Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Realistbear

Spivs Being Turned Down For Top Banking Jobs

Recommended Posts

http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/01092009/325/banks...-fsa-fears.html

Tuesday September 1, 01:35 PM

Reuters

Banks drop applicants on FSA fears

By Kirstin Ridley

LONDON (Reuters) - The country's leading banks are dropping around 9 percent of applicants for top management positions for fear the regulator will reject them and publicly damage reputations, a law firm said on Tuesday.

Calling for a confidential appeals process, law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain (RPC) said 12 candidates for senior jobs in top financial firms saw their applications dropped after separate face-to-face interviews with the regulator.

Since October 2008, when the Financial Services Authority (FSA) regulator started scrutinising top bank appointments in an effort to help prevent a re-run of the credit crisis, three others withdrew applications ahead of interviews with the regulator.

"In the current environment, no financial services company would want to take the risk of being publicly accused of putting forward a supposedly substandard candidate for the job," said Jonathan Davies, a partner at RPC, who requested the information from the FSA under the Freedom of Information Act.

"The reputational damage to the company would be huge and the ensuing publicity might severely restrict the candidate's ability to find another job."

A beefed-up FSA is riling parts of the financial industry as it slams tough new capital and liquidity requirements on banks, scrutinises appointments and attempts to both spearhead global attempts to curb bonuses and take on a greater enforcement role.

"It is essential that firms have competent boards who are able to demonstrate that they have the capabilities to deal with any risks that the firm may face," the FSA said in a statement.

"Our intensified approach to interviewing those people applying for significant positions in systemically important firms is robust and fair. It is a firm's decision as to whether it supports or withdraws a candidate. If the FSA finds a candidate unsuitable they can appeal."

FSA TOUGHENS UP

The FSA*, still smarting from accusations that its "light touch" approach helped fuel a boom that sowed the seeds of the near collapse of the financial system last October, has said it will interview applicants for jobs including chairman, chief executive, finance director and risk director at key banks.

The regulator said in May that in the first six months of its so-called "significant influence function" (SIF) review, it carried out 51 interviews and "a number of" case applications had been withdrawn following interviews which raised questions about the candidate's "fitness and propriety." :lol: :lol::lol:

The FSA has also started taking more action against senior management, where it spots "evidence of culpable misconduct."

Although some compliance officers at banks broadly support the FSA efforts to scrutinise bank policy, others have accused the regulator of risking imposing unacceptable restrictions on business strategies, appointments and company independence.

RPC's Davies noted that the FSA has also proposed approving directors and employees of the parent and holding companies of firms under its remit, if their decisions or actions are regularly taken into account by UK boards.

"Nobody objects to regulators having teeth and claws but they have to be careful not to abuse their powers. There is a concern about just now much arm-twisting the FSA is entering into to force companies into dropping their preferred job candidates," he said.

RPC said according to the data it had received, 147 candidates had been interviewed by the FSA between last October and July 31. Another 27 interviews had yet to be held.

_____________________________________

So, the new rules are cramping the banksters style? People they would have hired in a minute are now no longer considered because we might find out their previous form?

Just goes to show how crooked the whole system was and how Brown's "Light Touch" facilitated fraud.

_____________________

*The buck stops with Gordon as Chancellor during the decade of imprudence.

Edited by Realistbear

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well, we dont want failures at the top..we want prudence and the ability to use a calculator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The regulator said in May that in the first six months of its so-called "significant influence function" (SIF) review, it carried out 51 interviews and "a number of" case applications had been withdrawn following interviews which raised questions about the candidate's "fitness and propriety."

Awesome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame nobody interviewed any of the labour government before they ruined the country.

What suitable qualifications do Gordon, Darling or Mandelslime have?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As well as new candidates shouldn't they also be interviewing the incumbents already in jobs.

There will be a lot of spivs still working in the banks at the highest levels.

Edited by billybong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LONDON (Reuters) - The country's leading banks are dropping around 9 percent of applicants for top management positions for fear the regulator will reject them and publicly damage reputations, a law firm said on Tuesday.

Probably MPs looking for employment after the general election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they screen people to work with children...maybe they should have the same for bankers.

marks off for leaving with bonus before job done, marks off for being a bald cont, scottish, and for having no banking experience whatsoever.

should get rid of most of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   296 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.