Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
RajD

Fed Must Make Public Reports On Emergency Loans, U.s. Judge Says

Recommended Posts

BurnsExcellentSticker.jpg

My thoughts exactly. Just what we need to restore faith in the banking system. I'm sure Bernanke will sleep well tonight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My thoughts exactly. Just what we need to restore faith in the banking system. I'm sure Bernanke will sleep well tonight.

Time to wheel out the Bernanke facepalm again.

bernanke_0_3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lawyers will get rich.

Perhaps Bernanke needs to attend the seminar explaining free markets function only when people have the full facts.

Will Bernanke try to delay this until after he's been reappointed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldn't get your hopes up.

Suggested compromise after billions of dollars in lawyaers' fees ...Fed will open the books in 20 years time so people can have the info they want but 'without harming the banks'.

Probably outcome, but wouldn't the freedom of information laws get around that before the 20 years are up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

Court Orders Federal Reserve to Disclose Emergency Loan Details

Aug. 25 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve must for the first time identify the companies in its emergency lending programs after losing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.

Manhattan Chief U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled against the central bank yesterday, rejecting the argument that loan records aren’t covered by the law because their disclosure would harm borrowers’ competitive positions.

The Fed has refused to name the financial firms it lent to or disclose the amounts or the assets put up as collateral under 11 programs, most put in place during the deepest financial crisis since the Great Depression, saying that doing so might set off a run by depositors and unsettle shareholders. Bloomberg LP, the New York-based company majority-owned by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, sued on Nov. 7 on behalf of its Bloomberg News unit.

“The Federal Reserve has to be accountable for the decisions that it makes,†said Representative Alan Grayson, a Florida Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, after Preska’s ruling. “It’s one thing to say that the Federal Reserve is an independent institution. It’s another thing to say that it can keep us all in the dark.â€

The judge said the central bank “improperly withheld agency records†by “conducting an inadequate search†after Bloomberg News reporters filed a request under the information act. She gave the Fed five days to turn over documents it told the reporters it located, including 231 pages of reports, and said it must look for more at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which runs most of the loan programs.

‘Involuntary Investor’

The central bank “essentially speculates on how a borrower might enter a downward spiral of financial instability if its participation in the Federal Reserve lending programs were to be disclosed,†Preska wrote. “Conjecture, without evidence of imminent harm, simply fails to meet the Board’s burden†of proof.

David Skidmore, a Fed spokesman who said the board’s staff was reviewing the 47-page ruling, declined to comment on whether the central bank would appeal.

Bloomberg said in the suit that U.S. taxpayers need to know the terms of Fed lending because the public became an “involuntary investor†in the nation’s banks as the financial crisis deepened and the government began shoring up companies with capital injections and loans. Citigroup Inc. and American International Group Inc. are among those who have said they accepted Fed loans.

‘Public Interest’

“When an unprecedented amount of taxpayer dollars were lent to financial institutions in unprecedented ways and the Federal Reserve refused to make public any of the details of its extraordinary lending, Bloomberg News asked the court why U.S. citizens don’t have the right to know,†said Matthew Winkler, the editor-in-chief of Bloomberg News. “We’re gratified the court is defending the public’s right to know what is being done in the public interest.â€

The Fed’s balance sheet about doubled after lending standards were relaxed in the wake of the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. on Sept. 15, 2008. For the week ended Aug. 19, Fed assets rose 2.3 percent to $2.06 trillion as it continued to buy mortgage-backed securities under a program allowing the central bank to purchase non-government securities for the first time.

The U.S. House may vote as soon as next month on a bill to require the Fed to submit to audits by the Government Accountability Office, said Representative Scott Garrett, a New Jersey Republican on the Financial Services Committee.

‘Wake-Up Call’

The judge’s ruling “is strikingly good news,†Garrett said. “This is what the American people have been asking for.â€

The Freedom of Information Act obliges federal agencies to make government documents available to the press and public. The Bloomberg suit, filed in New York, didn’t seek money damages.

“The public deserves to know what’s being done with the money,†said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Arlington, Virginia-based Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. “This ought to be a wake-up call for the public that they need to be far more educated about this.â€

The case is Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

From Denninger's Market Ticker:

The only bad news is that coming from the district court it is not binding precedent, but if The Fed attempts to appeal it and loses it will become so - and a quick perusal of the opinion shows little meat for The Fed to attempt an appeal upon.

For those that have the time to peruse the 47 page document! It can be found here

Edited by RajD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Probably outcome, but wouldn't the freedom of information laws get around that before the 20 years are up?

National security....you a tewwowist or sommit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   288 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.