Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
Sign in to follow this  

Five Months On And Quantitative Easing Still Isn’t Working

Recommended Posts


THERE was a moment in each of the Apollo missions (post Apollo 8 ) when the spacecraft passed into lunar orbit and swung round the dark side of the moon. For a nail-biting few hours, the spacecraft would lose all radio contact with mission control in Houston. They knew when it was supposed to emerge from orbit, but likewise that if they had made any mistakes in their pre-launch calculations, the craft and its occupants might never have been heard from again.

The sensation in the Bank of England at the moment is rather similar. Billions of pounds (almost £125bn to be precise) have been poured into the economy through quantitative easing (QE). The experts have a pretty good idea of what that money ought to do in the long run to bring the economy back to reasonable health, but it is still probably too early to see any convincing signs of it working. That, according to Charlie Bean, the deputy governor for monetary policy, will probably take around nine months.

Well, here we are, five months into the experiment, and evidence of its success is still mighty hard to come by. The theory is pretty clear. The Bank inserts the money into the economy, by buying bonds off banks and investors. That - step one - increases the stock of money in the economy by £125bn (since this is newly-created cash). Step two is that the investors then use that money to go out and spend on other investments, giving the economy a well-earned kick-start.

The problem is, according to the latest stats from the Bank, we haven’t yet even had any convincing signs that step one is working very well. All other things being equal, one would expect a £125bn injection to increase the amount of cash sloshing around the economy (the Bank calls this M4 - no relation to the motorway) by 7pc or more. But according to figures released this morning, the growth in the key measure of M4 (including complex and noisy things like hedge funds) tailed off in June, falling 0.6pc in June following a 0.2pc rise in May.

As you can see from this chart, provided by Fathom Consulting, the growth rate is hardly anywhere near the 7pc minimum you might expect given what the Bank is pumping into the economy. “It implies,†according to Fathom, “that banks are using some of the cash themselves and hoarding much of the rest.â€

Meanwhile, lending to companies dropped significantly - a further sign of the crunch facing businesses which prompted the Chancellor’s rather bizarre verbal intervention at the weekend. As I remarked in my last blog, it all rather supports the view that banks are doing as their zombified relations did in the Japanese boom and sitting on the cash rather than using it or lending it out.

There is a healthy debate to be had over whether, on the one hand, this indicates that QE is pointless and should be cancelled as soon as possible or, on the other hand, whether it has merely not been carried out with enough force to yield any meaningful result. On the other hand (economists all have three hands as you know) is the Bean argument to be patient and wait for the money to take effect. My feeling is more sympathetic towards the second of these options - that there may still be room for a little more QE, but I freely admit that, this being the dark side of the economic moon, this involves a leap of faith rather than a clear idea of where it will leave us.

But my rationale is as follows: these money stats are hardly a warning bell for inflation. If anything, they hint that we are likely to be deeper entrenched in deflation than anyone properly admits at the moment. That truly is something to be avoided at almost any cost.

In the meantime, we await the moment when that spacecraft resumes transmission and informs us everything is back to normal again. Wishful thinking, of course. The next major episode to look out for will come next week, when the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee finally decides whether it will extend QE to the next level of £150bn.

If QE was going to have any effect for me the money had to be put directly into the economy, via a tax cut or simply send everyone a check. We have a debt crisis simply giving money to the banks by buying bonds was only going to result in them hoarding cash.

However simply giving people free cash opens up the possibility of uncontrollable inflation as you have the problem of moral hazard why work if you can simply be given free cash.

It does appear that QE has been an abject failure in terms of creating a boost in the economy.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   288 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?

      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.