Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Religion Is Evil - A Classic Example Of Why


Recommended Posts

0
HOLA441
  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1
HOLA442
Guest X-QUORK
So often the case, that fervent aetheists transmogrify into Agnosticism later in life...............

Hedging their bets. It doesn't imply some near-death wisdom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2
HOLA443
3
HOLA444
4
HOLA445
Hedging their bets. It doesn't imply some near-death wisdom.

So at a stroke, you're smarter than Voltaire?

In order to "Hedge any bet or position" one actually has to do something........................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5
HOLA446
Guest Skinty
So I guess you are working in the Expert Systems, Neural Networks and AI areas Skinty?

Biologically inspired self organising neural networks and other models that produce emergent phenomena.

However logic must still be used: as it is in Boolean Algebra, e.g.

Only because they are implemented on a computer that uses logic. I could theoretically piece them together using real neural cells that do the same thing. I understand them and describe them to others using analogies of other physical systems.

I do have to admit to being confused as to why people think that if you see logic as nothing more than a concept and a tool that allows one to reason about the world that this should lead to mysticism, agnosticism, and fascism. I think I have missed some underlying assumption somewhere in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6
HOLA447
No worries. The mods beat you to it. Thanks for trying though.

I cannot post a link to the photo because my photobucket web link has been blocked. It was fine when I posted charts and stuff.

Says all you need to know about this managed society we live in. Our government undertakes the industrial slaughter of innocents, for the direct benefit of the bankers, arms manufactures, and oil related industries. Yet a link to a photo of those deeds is deemed offensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7
HOLA448
I cannot post a link to the photo because my photobucket web link has been blocked. It was fine when I posted charts and stuff.

Says all you need to know about this managed society we live in. Our government undertakes the industrial slaughter of innocents, for the direct benefit of the bankers, arms manufactures, and oil related industries. Yet a link to a photo of those deeds is deemed offensive.

The deeds are offensive enough without the need for photographic justification. I'm sure that those that find that image offensive would find images of 7 July victims equally offensive.

Regards,

Q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8
HOLA449
Guest X-QUORK
So at a stroke, you're smarter than Voltaire?

In order to "Hedge any bet or position" one actually has to do something........................

Sigh. No, I don't think I'm smarter than Voltaire, nor Rowan Williams for that matter. Does it follow that my atheist beliefs are incorrect? What about all the seriously bright atheists? I think this might be an intellectual cul-de-sac you've led us down.

As for your hedging pedantry, Voltaire did do something, he changed his position from atheist to agnostic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9
HOLA4410
10
HOLA4411
11
HOLA4412

Virtually all of your stories relate to individuals acting alone, or with the assistance of individuals they have paid. "Honour killings" frequently involve family or community members condoning or assisting in the murder(s). There is a big difference IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12
HOLA4413

The Thread Title mentions religion: where are the religious connotations in the webrefs you cite?

Couldn't find one!

And furthermore, where are the "Honour Killing" relationships?

Simply, there aren't any.

All societies suffer a certain incidence of violence and murder.

And since Torquemada et al, I know of no incidence of religiously motivated killings or punishments amongst Christian states in the West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13
HOLA4414

Remind me to spend a couple of hours trawling the web to find examples of honour killings amongst the muslim world. These all seem to be husbands/partners of people, not their brothers, nephews, cousins etc. Nowhere in these articles does the religion of the killer seem to have been an issue.

Here's a few to get started

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6743357.stm

http://www.iris.org.il/blog/archives/2250-...rned-Alive.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/11/iraq.humanrights

http://www.stophonourkillings.com/

Additionally these killers in your examples all seem to have worked alone in a fit of rage, rather than attacking in a cowardly

group on a pre-meditated basis.

Still keep apologising for them if you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14
HOLA4415

So why do you feel there is so much difference between someone acting alone to exact revenge for a slight and the more tightly knit societies having their kinsmen taking the action?

I am genuinely concerned that you see one as fine, and the other as a religious issue. The others do not mention christianity as a cause as the religion of white british males tends to be assumed. Or perhaps you don't believe that either?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15
HOLA4416
Because from what you post, it is abundantly clear you haven't got a degree (or two) which actually requires you to understand the question and find information to prove or disprove a question or statement put to you.

Yeah, yeah, keep on with the adhominems - it'll make people respect you no end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16
HOLA4417
So why do you feel there is so much difference between someone acting alone to exact revenge for a slight and the more tightly knit societies having their kinsmen taking the action?

Because the customs and social and religious mores of nation states dating back three or four hundred years are not apposite to be imported to countries which gave up burning people at the stake and etc back in the 16th Cent.

I am genuinely concerned that you see one as fine, and the other as a religious issue. The others do not mention christianity as a cause as the religion of white british males tends to be assumed. Or perhaps you don't believe that either?

Assuming most white men in Britain - a Godless morally bankrupt society - are "Christian" is about as logical as assuming everyone who follows Islam is a terrorist.

You have proven zero relationship or connection between the cases you site: and British religion.

I note also by the way that you do not cite any of the multitude of murder cases happening today amongst for example, Afro-Carribean communities in major cities such as London.

No I wonder why this can be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17
HOLA4418
So why do you feel there is so much difference between someone acting alone to exact revenge for a slight and the more tightly knit societies having their kinsmen taking the action?

I am genuinely concerned that you see one as fine, and the other as a religious issue. The others do not mention christianity as a cause as the religion of white british males tends to be assumed. Or perhaps you don't believe that either?

I don't see one as fine. I said they were different. However, I do feel that group vengeance can never be justifiable and is more dangerous.

When an individual wants to harm someone who they believe has harmed them that's one thing. Such individuals will always exist but In a healthy community, those who have not been harmed may be able to persuade the individual concerned (if informed) that disproportionate action should not be followed, or at least not become directly involved. When the members of that same community encourage or participate in the disproportionate response to something that does not even involve them that is a much more dangerous scenario.

Your examples were primarily in the former category and so contributed nothing to the point I think you were trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18
HOLA4419
I note also by the way that you do not cite any of the multitude of murder cases happening today amongst for example, Afro-Carribean communities in major cities such as London.

No I wonder why this can be?

Simple media bias. These were the main ones that came up from the search box on news.bbc...

Assuming most white men in Britain - a Godless morally bankrupt society - are "Christian" is about as logical as assuming everyone who follows Islam is a terrorist.

I would suggest that the vast majority of those on their documentation will state CofE or Catholic. I think it a much better assumption that the one you suggest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19
HOLA4420
Because the customs and social and religious mores of nation states dating back three or four hundred years are not apposite to be imported to countries which gave up burning people at the stake and etc back in the 16th Cent.

So, its ok for people to act alone, but not in concert? Its ok for people to act when they are angry, but not when someone else is angry? Its ok to do something appalling in cruelty and effect for a vague feeling of personal slight, but not to do it for a well thought out and lucid set of reasons?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20
HOLA4421

fwiw I'm pretty sure a few people got their kneecaps blown off for seeing catholic / protestant girls during the troubles.

A few abortion doctors in America could be forgiven for harbouring fearful thoughts towards some of their christian country men also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21
HOLA4422
I don't see one as fine. I said they were different. However, I do feel that group vengeance can never be justifiable and is more dangerous.

When an individual wants to harm someone who they believe has harmed them that's one thing. Such individuals will always exist but In a healthy community, those who have not been harmed may be able to persuade the individual concerned (if informed) that disproportionate action should not be followed, or at least not become directly involved. When the members of that same community encourage or participate in the disproportionate response to something that does not even involve them that is a much more dangerous scenario.

Your examples were primarily in the former category and so contributed nothing to the point I think you were trying to make.

So if any one of those had got his heavy mate to help out, that would be bad? If they paid someone to deal with it would that be a problem?

How about if it wasn't them being slighted - but say their neighbours kids? That ok then for a mob to kill someone?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/6569005.stm

I am not saying that honour killing is ok - I am saying it is only really any different in the terminology used, and that the white british folk are plenty as bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22
HOLA4423
fwiw I'm pretty sure a few people got their kneecaps blown off for seeing catholic / protestant girls during the troubles.

A few abortion doctors in America could be forgiven for harbouring fearful thoughts towards some of their christian country men also.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8087376.stm

Hundreds of mourners have attended the funeral of US abortion doctor George Tiller, who was shot dead at a church in Wichita, Kansas, last Sunday.

Anti-abortionists had vilified Dr Tiller for being one of the few US doctors to perform late-term abortions.

His funeral was conducted in a different church to that in which he was killed by a single gunshot.

A man aged 51, who is believed to be an anti-abortionist, has been arrested and charged with the murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23
HOLA4424
So if any one of those had got his heavy mate to help out, that would be bad? If they paid someone to deal with it would that be a problem?

How about if it wasn't them being slighted - but say their neighbours kids? That ok then for a mob to kill someone?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/hampshire/6569005.stm

I am not saying that honour killing is ok - I am saying it is only really any different in the terminology used, and that the white british folk are plenty as bad.

They're all "worse" than individual revenge as they are involving people in a crime in which they have no direct interest. However, the first two examples involve people who like violence anyway (heavy and hitman) so are not particularly relevant. The third example, yes, that is just as bad.

If you read my posts I have not made any direct reference to Islam. Any ideology/groupthink that encourages disproprortionate responses and exhorts others to take part in "mob revenge" is not healthy for any community.

Edit: i.e. I agree with your last point :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24
HOLA4425
Biologically inspired self organising neural networks and other models that produce emergent phenomena.

Only because they are implemented on a computer that uses logic. I could theoretically piece them together using real neural cells that do the same thing. I understand them and describe them to others using analogies of other physical systems.

I do have to admit to being confused as to why people think that if you see logic as nothing more than a concept and a tool that allows one to reason about the world that this should lead to mysticism, agnosticism, and fascism. I think I have missed some underlying assumption somewhere in this thread.

Interesting, I was having a discussion about this last month, we never resolved it but drained a rather nice glenmorangie trying.

Do you think AI will ever work in a Turing test sort of way given that no matter how complex or abstract the simulated mind it will always have to be reduced to logic at some point if we wish to run the simulation on a computer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information