Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

interestrateripoff

13 Doctors Demand Inquest Into Dr David Kelly's Death

Recommended Posts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...llys-death.html

The death of Government scientist David Kelly returned to haunt Labour today as a group of doctors announced that they were mounting a legal challenge to overturn the finding of suicide.

Dr Kelly's body was found six years ago this week in woods close to his Oxfordshire home, shortly after he was exposed as the source of a BBC news report questioning the grounds for war in Iraq.

Unusually, no coroner's inquest was held into his death.

The only official verdict has come from the Hutton Inquiry, commissioned by Tony Blair, which concluded that Dr Kelly, 59, died from loss of blood after cutting his wrist with a blunt gardening knife.

Critics regarded the report as a 'whitewash', and Mr Blair remains acutely sensitive to the accusation that he has 'blood on his hands' over the scientist's death.

But now a team of 13 specialist doctors has compiled a detailed medical dossier that rejects the Hutton conclusion on the grounds that a cut to the ulnar artery, which is small and difficult to access, could not have caused death.

It will be used by their lawyers to demand a formal inquest and the release of Dr Kelly's autopsy report, which has never been published. It will also be sent to Sir John Chilcot's forthcoming inquiry into the Iraq War.

The 12-page opinion, a copy of which has been seen by The Mail on Sunday, concludes: 'The bleeding from Dr Kelly's ulnar artery is highly unlikely to have been so voluminous and rapid that it was the cause of death.

'We advise the instructing solicitors to obtain the autopsy reports so that the concerns of a group of properly interested medical specialists can be answered.'

The doctors do not say how, or why, they believe Dr Kelly did die but they have worked closely with campaigning Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker, who believes that the scientist was murdered by enemies he made in the course of his work as a weapons inspector.

And two of the doctors have added to the sense of persistent intrigue surrounding Dr Kelly by claiming that thousands of emails relating to the case had 'vanished' from their computers, in what one claimed was an act of 'state-sponsored sabotage'.

A coroner's inquest into Dr Kelly's death was suspended before it could begin by order of the then Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer. He used the Coroners Act to designate the Hutton Inquiry as 'fulfilling the function of an inquest', but as a judicial investigation it had no power to make witnesses give evidence under oath.

After taking evidence from - but not cross-examining - Dr Nicholas Hunt, the pathologist who carried out the post-mortem examination, Lord Hutton concluded that 'the principal cause of death was bleeding from incised wounds to the left wrist' combined with the consumption of painkillers and 'silent coronary artery disease'.

The doctors also say that the level of the painkiller co-proxamol in Dr Kelly's blood was about one third of that required to produce death and point to Dr Hunt's comments at the end of giving evidence to Lord Hutton.

Asked if there was anything further he would like to say on the circumstances leading to Dr Kelly's death, he said: 'Nothing I could say as a pathologist, no.'

After the report was published, Dr Hunt added to the doctors' suspicions by telling Channel 4 that he thought a full coroner's inquest should be held.

This govt I hope is finished this is like the end days of the Tory corruption in the 90s although the stories now are far worse.

I hope the truth comes out and Blair is implicated, although that I fear is wishful thinking.

I wonder how the establishment will rig it this time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And, in he news next week, 13 doctors (with a shared interest in hill walking) were tragically killed when their camper vans collided and exploded in central Cardiff (leaving a substantial crater) whilst they were travelling to the Welsh hills. The police are not looking for anyone else in connection with the incident.

:ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So what is the suggestion here? That the government had him killed, or others connected with Iraqi weapons programmes.

And what was their motive for killing him?

Do I remember correctly he was writing a book?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So what is the suggestion here? That the government had him killed, or others connected with Iraqi weapons programmes.

And what was their motive for killing him?

One suggestion posited, is that SiS\MI5 hired some mercs to kill him (possibly expendable Iraqis) and used the French intelligence services as an intermediary to allow for plausible deniability. The actual team that injected Kelly to kill him (using a substance that is metabolised quickly and breaks down into other compounds) would have been liquidated soon after to prevent them talking.

Possible motives include the cover-up of Iraqi WMD lies, his knowledge of research into bio\chemical warfare at Porton Down and other locations, and the existence of planned programmes to release bioweapons on a large scale (disguised as a 'leak').

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So what is the suggestion here? That the government had him killed, or others connected with Iraqi weapons programmes.

And what was their motive for killing him?

express.co.uk

UK NEWS

KELLY’S BOOK OF SECRETS

Story Image

Dr David Kelly

Sunday July 5,2009

Comment Speech Bubble Have your say(13)

WEAPONS inspector David Kelly was writing a book exposing highly damaging government secrets before his ­mysterious death.

He was intending to reveal that he warned Prime Minister Tony Blair there were no weapons of mass destruction anywhere in Iraq weeks before the ­British and American invasion.

He had several discussions with a publisher in Oxford and was seeking advice on how far he could go without breaking the law on secrets.

Following his death, his computers were seized and it is still not known if any rough draft was discovered by investigators and, if so, what happened to the material.

Dr Kelly was also intending to lift the lid on a potentially bigger scandal, his own secret dealings in germ warfare with the apartheid regime in South Africa.

US television investigators have spent four years preparing a 90-minute documentary, Anthrax War, suggesting there is a global black market in anthrax and exposing the mystery “suicides†of five government germ warfare scientists from around the world.

ì

He wanted his story to come out

î

Director Bob Coen said: ‘‘The deeper you look into the murky world of governments and germ warfare, the more worrying it becomes.

“We have proved there is a black ­market in anthrax. David Kelly was of particular interest to us because he was a world expert on anthrax and he was involved in some degree with assisting the secret germ warfare programme in apartheid South Africa.â€

Dr Kelly was found dead in woods near his Oxfordshire home on July 17 2003. His apparent suicide came two days after he was interrogated in the ­Commons over his behind-the-scenes role in exposing the flaws in the “sexed-up†Number 10 dossier which justified Britain going to war with Iraq.

SEARCH UK NEWS for:

Conspiracy theorists have claimed he was murdered.

British author Gordon Thomas said last night: ‘‘I knew David Kelly very well and he called me because he was working on a book.

“He told me he had warned Tony Blair there were no weapons of mass destruction. I advised him that as he had signed the Official Secrets Act life could get ­difficult for him.

“I gained the impression that he was prepared to take the flak as he wanted his story to come out.â€

Anthrax War will be screened ­privately in London on July 17, the sixth anniversary of Dr Kelly’s death.

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/111971...book-of-secrets

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One suggestion posited, is that SiS\MI5 hired some mercs to kill him (possibly expendable Iraqis) and used the French intelligence services as an intermediary to allow for plausible deniability. The actual team that injected Kelly to kill him (using a substance that is metabolised quickly and breaks down into other compounds) would have been liquidated soon after to prevent them talking.

Possible motives include the cover-up of Iraqi WMD lies, his knowledge of research into bio\chemical warfare at Porton Down and other locations, and the existence of planned programmes to release bioweapons on a large scale (disguised as a 'leak').

We have our own people who do these "wet operations". If they talk, they die too.

He was fatally undermining the WMD case to invade Iraq. The governments play was to use fear which is well known to cause conformity and herd behaviour to get us into a war.

This is part of a longer term energy strategy in Middle East.

Make a war, show off technology and sell it to others in the region,demolish predesignated targets with smart bombs and allow only US contractors to bid to rebuild them ( Kuwait), then invade Iraq, pull same real estate rebuild trick, charge them for security and build land bases for invasion of Iran. All paid for by the local oil wealth.

Its about energy.

Nick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We have our own people who do these "wet operations". If they talk, they die too.

He was fatally undermining the WMD case to invade Iraq. The governments play was to use fear which is well known to cause conformity and herd behaviour to get us into a war.

This is part of a longer term energy strategy in Middle East.

Make a war, show off technology and sell it to others in the region,demolish predesignated targets with smart bombs and allow only US contractors to bid to rebuild them ( Kuwait), then invade Iraq, pull same real estate rebuild trick, charge them for security and build land bases for invasion of Iran. All paid for by the local oil wealth.

Its about energy.

Nick

The thing is, Kelly had reportedly said "I'll be found dead in the woods" yet he didn't seem to take any measures to protect himself from a possible assassination...

As an MoD employee surely he'd know what to expect if he talked about anything classed under the OSA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thing is, Kelly had reportedly said "I'll be found dead in the woods" yet he didn't seem to take any measures to protect himself from a possible assassination...

As an MoD employee surely he'd know what to expect if he talked about anything classed under the OSA.

Maybe he knew the people he was dealing with, would get him no matter what he did... :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe he knew the people he was dealing with, would get him no matter what he did... :ph34r:

Hmm... well, suggestions aside, I don't have a concrete explanation of just who killed him and why. Hence the inquest being demanded to establish the facts. What we do know are the sloppy attempts to make it look like a suicide were unconvincing. Wrong vein pierced, very little blood, body being moved, non-lethal quantity of pills in the stomach etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm... well, suggestions aside, I don't have a concrete explanation of just who killed him and why. Hence the inquest being demanded to establish the facts. What we do know are the sloppy attempts to make it look like a suicide were unconvincing. Wrong vein pierced, very little blood, body being moved, non-lethal quantity of pills in the stomach etc.

Well if that is all true it would not indicate some group that knew what they were doing ? Or maybe it was a double bluff.. :ph34r:

How exciting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   296 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.