Jump to content
House Price Crash Forum
interestrateripoff

Job Losses 'will Keep Rising For Another Year'

Recommended Posts

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business...ar-1706228.html

Unemployment will continue increasing until the end of next year, long after the economy has started to recover from the recession, a new report predicted today.

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) said that although some economists were saying that the end of the recession may be in sight, unemployment will carry on rising for many months even after the UK economy has begun to pick up.

Using official figures and comparing the current recession to the economic downturn of the early 1990s, the TUC predicted that the number of people losing their jobs will carry on increasing until at least the autumn of next year.

The gloomy forecast came ahead of new figures tomorrow, which are expected to show another big increase in the jobless total.

The number of unemployed people increased by 244,000 over the three months to March to reach 2.22 million, the biggest quarterly rise since 1981.

The claimant count was 1.51 million in April, up 57,100 over the previous month and up 710,700 over the year to reach the highest since August 1997.

Officials at the TUC said there had always been a delay between the economy starting to grow and unemployment beginning to fall, as cautious employers make use of capacity among existing staff before recruiting new employees.

In the last recession, economic output began to grow in the autumn of 1991, but it was 18 months later before unemployment started to fall, said the report.

The current recession was already proving to be much worse than the 1990s recession, said the union organisation, with a sharper fall in economic output.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "Some now say that we have a recovery, but even if this is not a false dawn, as others fear, it will be years before the thousands of people who have lost their jobs, or who will lose them in months to come, will see anything to celebrate.

"That's why tackling unemployment must remain the Government's number one priority. Speeding up the process of getting people back into work and into jobs with decent pay will not only benefit the two million people currently out of work, but will also give the economy the spending boost it needs."

Meanwhile, the new jobless figures will paint a picture of a public sector protected from the worst of the recession, but gearing up for 350,000 cuts in the next five years, according to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD).

Chief economist John Philpott said: "Predictions of reduced pain in the jobs market, and a lower peak in the jobless totals, are premature.

"The public sector has yet to feel the full impact of the recession, and the resultant bloodbath in the public finances. The CIPD's current estimate is that the fiscal squeeze implied by government plans will result in a total of 350,000 job cuts in the public sector overall between 2010/11 and 2014/15.

"This will be preceded by around 30,000 job cuts in local authorities in the next year."

The report said cuts on this scale would still leave the public sector workforce bigger than it was when Gordon Brown became Chancellor in 1997, leaving "ample scope" for a new government to take an even bigger axe to public sector jobs after the general election.

More green shoots?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO unemployment will keep rising steadily for at least a year probably two or three and then stick at that level for the next 10 years.

A chart on the unemployment levels would certainly not be out of place in the graphs section. Can anyone help?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A chart on the unemployment levels would certainly not be out of place in the graphs section. Can anyone help?

Possibly there is someone recently redundant who would have the time to compile this data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its probably worse....I also presume that the unemployment stats do not reflect the total job losses from the <<dailymail rant on>> invasion of eastern European migrant scum <<dailymail rant off>> who have fled the UK as the work dries up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its probably worse....I also presume that the unemployment stats do not reflect the total job losses from the <<dailymail rant on>> invasion of eastern European migrant scum <<dailymail rant off>> who have fled the UK as the work dries up.

Don't forget to add in those with working partners, who just get benefits for 6 months and then helpfully drop off the stats.

I think this is part of the reason why the claimant count didn't go up as expected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody who remember's the 80's and 90's recessions knows that the unemployment that results lasts a good five years after the recession has technically ended. Remember the recession is over when growth returns, but it is growth as measured from a lower base, following the loss of capacity.

The effects of the recession also fall disproportionately on the under 25's and over 55's, as the former are easier to get rid of, having just started their 'careers' and the over 55's are seen as deadwood, regardless of whether they are or not.

In time the over 55's become pensioners and disappear from the stats, and the economy develops excess capacity so that the youger age groups find employment again, hey ho - unemployment falls.

Still it's a grim period for those left mouldering, the recession will apparently be over, but not for them for a long time.

(I'm from the North West and was born in 1973, I remember the whole of the 1980's as being one long recession and I'm still in that mind-set now. When I was growing up during the Thatcher era/error unemployment was running at about 25% in my area. The current recession seems mild in comparison.)

Edited by No Teacher - No Guru

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • The Prime Minister stated that there were three Brexit options available to the UK:   296 members have voted

    1. 1. Which of the Prime Minister's options would you choose?


      • Leave with the negotiated deal
      • Remain
      • Leave with no deal

    Please sign in or register to vote in this poll. View topic


×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.