interestrateripoff Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/fe...ikes-tea-breaks British workers' love of a sit down and a cuppa helped ensure they lost their chance of a job to rival Italian and Portuguese workers, a report revealed today.An inquiry by the conciliation service Acas into the wildcat strikes that followed British workers losing out to European nationals at an oil refinery at Lindsey, North Lincolnshire, has cleared the firms involved of breaking any laws. They are Total, the French oil giant which runs the refinery, US engineering contractor Jacobs Engineering, and Irem, the Italian subcontractor at the centre of the dispute. Irem was one of seven companies bidding for the work, five of which were based in Britain. The report reveals how unions complained that Irem's proposed shift pattern for the contract did not include paid tea breaks, even though all the British firms bidding for the work were required to include them in the contract. The report found: "The time of a tea break may seem small but when multiplied by several hundred workers over the period of a contract for several months it can mount up to a considerable saving of time and, therefore, money ... Given that the contract was being awarded on a lump-sum basis of a fixed number of hours in which to complete the job, the above was felt by the unions to give Irem an unfair competitive advantage." Irem's management said it had offered a longer lunch break instead of the tea break, a move permitted under the terms and conditions set down in a national agreement for the engineering construction industry. Irem's workers were also required to change into work clothing during their own time, another money-saver. The dispute led to walk-outs from the nuclear site at Sellafield to refineries across England and Scotland. Acas's findings led today to Lord Mandelson, the business secretary, announcing an inquiry into productivity, to the anger of unions. The inquiry will be led by Mark Gibson, who is leaving a senior post within Mandelson's department this month. Mandelson said: "Acas confirms that neither UK nor European law was broken at Lindsey and that European workers were covered by the industry's collective agreement, including the going rates of pay. Such an approach across the industry should avoid disputes in the future ... but my central concern is that British workers should have the skills and productivity to do jobs both at home and across Europe." Unions yesterday expressed "extreme concern" about the lack of wage transparency and the employment status of the Irem workers. Paul Kenny, the GMB general secretary, said: "As things now stand, the UK business department, EU commission and European court of justice are a powerful and malevolent political machine, working with employers to cut terms and conditions of the UK construction engineering workforce. They are now meeting serious resistence." So it was all down to tea breaks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/fe...ikes-tea-breaksSo it was all down to tea breaks? They want tea breaks, I have never heard of such cheek. Lazy bastards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shedfish Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 how many tea breaks in a siesta? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Um_Bongo Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/fe...ikes-tea-breaksSo it was all down to tea breaks? The great worry is, is this a break down of globalisation or a ramp up? Do we need to work our fingers to the bone to bring up our families from now on - while the bankers laugh all the way to the bank with our money? You must admit, the effects of this catastrophe seem to be having a great benefit to a few people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNACR Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 Many years ago when I was in PAYE employment I always found tea breaks a waste of time. I'd much rather have gone without and gone home half an hour earlier. It always seemed to be an opportunity for the same group of people to talk at you about their divorce, foreign holiday, what they cooked for tea last night in excruciating detail, their recent mastectomy and anything else under the sub-heading banal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Um_Bongo Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 Many years ago when I was in PAYE employment I always found tea breaks a waste of time. I'd much rather have gone without and gone home half an hour earlier. It always seemed to be an opportunity for the same group of people to talk at you about their divorce, foreign holiday, what they cooked for tea last night in excruciating detail, their recent mastectomy and anything else under the sub-heading banal. Life of the party you are aren't ya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fudge Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 You can sum the whole purpose of management as getting workers to do more, for less. That's it. Thats all you need to know to understand everything they do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
200p Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 LOL Management will do away with Lunch too if they can Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
interestrateripoff Posted February 16, 2009 Author Share Posted February 16, 2009 LOLManagement will do away with Lunch too if they can Except for them, and if they can they'll wrangle a free lunch that the firm pays for as it's a "working lunch". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkshire Lad Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 I'll bet that all the Europeans contractors who smoked could be regularly seen in the designated smoking areas, and those that didnt went for a passive drag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The XYY Man Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 This thread is a serious contender for the biggest bull-shit thread of the year, or perhaps even the decade. British "management" and "government" are the real culprits, and to suggest otherwise is folly of the finest order. Many industries have given up their traditional hard-won rights such as tea-breaks and the right to pursue industrial action(almost exclusively fought for in the first place by unions or well-meaning philanthropists) in order to meet the challenges of the global market of the 70s/80s/90s/00s etc blah blah blah... But all those promises of well paid and secure employment forever are, yet again, sounding pretty hollow. The "no-strike" agreements that were meant to ensure perpetual prosperity to those who signed up to them must seem pretty crass to workers at such plants as Nissan here in the North East who are now facing life on the Nat King Cole. Sold down the river yet again - when will the British worker EVER learn...??? Sadly, the probable answer is "never"... XYY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolf Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 "working class" = bone idle (employed or not) "middle class" = nearly everyone else "upper class" = > 1 million GBP inherited wealth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelly123 Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 I'll quote arnold swarchzenaga here (yeah I know but I cant be @rsed checking how its spelt) Allthough we know him today as governor of the most stupid state on planet earth, and possibly the worst actor ever He originally made fame as the most sucessfull body builder ever, and he said that breaks from training to recover are as equally as important as the training itself. This is more Guardian b ulls hit about foreign workers being so willing to work and the English dont want too Same as that shight about Polish workers doing the jobs English refuse to do......................... Where are these people who refuse to work? It is all a massive whitewash by the labour party to import cheap labour, and invent lies about English refuseing to work. Some of them polish birds are pretty filthy looking though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bootfair Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 (edited) Am I missing something here. It says that BRITISH WORKERS HAD TO WORK UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS TO THE OTHERS!! The Firms were REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT TO INCLUDE TEA BREAKS.. THen the fact this was adhered to was used as the reason not to offer the contract to BRitish Workers! They stipulate one thing in the contract, then use that as an excuse NOT to hire the British when it is met. Offering longer lunch breaks does not fulful the Contract terms the Firms were asked to bid under.. how is that fair, exactly? Edited February 16, 2009 by bootfair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormymonday_2011 Posted February 16, 2009 Share Posted February 16, 2009 (edited) Watching Paxman's program on Victorian culture last night I was interested to see Ford Maddox Browns idealisation of the dignity of labour discussed with reference to the reality of life in the slums and factories of industrial England Inspired by his example I am thinking of taking up my brush and painting my own series of great works entitled The Banker Pondering His Bonus Offshore Workers Protected By Goons At Their Moorings At Grimsby Managers Laying Off Staff At Dawn Bank Runs, Bailouts And Insolvency Damien Hirst may as well jack it in now. Edited February 16, 2009 by up2nogood Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadoube Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/fe...ikes-tea-breaksSo it was all down to tea breaks? Fair dos. A tea break, a fag break and some people have taken a half day off, leaving the rest to carry their load. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jadoube Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Am I missing something here.It says that BRITISH WORKERS HAD TO WORK UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS TO THE OTHERS!! The Firms were REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT TO INCLUDE TEA BREAKS.. THen the fact this was adhered to was used as the reason not to offer the contract to BRitish Workers! They stipulate one thing in the contract, then use that as an excuse NOT to hire the British when it is met. Offering longer lunch breaks does not fulful the Contract terms the Firms were asked to bid under.. how is that fair, exactly? I think they're saying the British firms were required by their contract with the British workers - not by the contract with Total. Totally fair, the Britsh shot themselves in the foot. The implication is that foreign workers don't have tea breaks written in to their terms of employment. Based on observing totally unscientific samples I'd say it was accurate that foreign workers don't skive off for tea as much as the British worker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saberu Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) The implication is that foreign workers don't have tea breaks written in to their terms of employment. Based on observing totally unscientific samples I'd say it was accurate that foreign workers don't skive off for tea as much as the British worker. I think the bigger question here is why should tea breaks be looked on with such disdain? If taxes and property laws weren't akin to theft in this country then companies could afford to give them. Shouldn't the aim of our 'great country' to be nicer to our workers? Rather than trying to dumb our standards down to meet Eastern Europe first, and then Asia second. Labour won't be happy until we are slaves. Seems to me this is a symptom of a wider problem..too many people and not enough jobs, in other words too many suckers looking for other people to pay their way and not enough value creators (businessmen), partly because of the monopolosation of markets to the point where there isn't much left for the small businessman to do. Edited February 17, 2009 by Saberu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkman Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Many years ago when I was in PAYE employment I always found tea breaks a waste of time. I'd much rather have gone without and gone home half an hour earlier. It always seemed to be an opportunity for the same group of people to talk at you about their divorce, foreign holiday, what they cooked for tea last night in excruciating detail, their recent mastectomy and anything else under the sub-heading banal. Amen to that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eightiesgirly Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Fair dos. A tea break, a fag break and some people have taken a half day off, leaving the rest to carry their load. Bl00dy hell, they'll be wanting a break between days to sleep next! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Um_Bongo Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Surely after decades of refinements and automations to working practices that computerisation and robotisations has afforded us we can take a cup of tea every now and again? Shouldn't we be aiming to use our time gained through efficiency for our own happiness rather than for the pocket linings of the global elite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkman Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Surely after decades of refinements and automations to working practices that computerisation and robotisations has afforded us we can take a cup of tea every now and again? The opposite is true. Technology has worked us harder, unfortunately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darwin Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Watching Paxman's program on Victorian culture last night I was interested to see Ford Maddox Browns idealisation of the dignity of labour discussed with reference to the reality of life in the slums and factories of industrial EnglandInspired by his example I am thinking of taking up my brush and painting my own series of great works entitled The Banker Pondering His Bonus Offshore Workers Protected By Goons At Their Moorings At Grimsby Managers Laying Off Staff At Dawn Bank Runs, Bailouts And Insolvency Damien Hirst may as well jack it in now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Spart Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 (edited) Tea Breaks Helped Lose British Workers Jobs At Lindsey, Report Finds I'll put the kettle on. Edited February 17, 2009 by Dave Spart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Spart Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Tea Breaks Helped Lose British Workers Jobs At Lindsey, Report Finds I suppose they'll have plenty of time for tea now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.