interestrateripoff Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...-main-home.html Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has claimed more than £116,000 in Commons expenses for a 'second home' while effectively lodging with her sister.Ms Smith claims the maximum parliamentary second-home allowance, currently a tax-free £24,006 a year, on the detached house in her West Midlands constituency, where her husband and two young children live and which she bought for £300,000 five years ago. She is able to do so because she has told the Commons authorities that her 'main home' is a house in London owned solely by her sister, Sara, where she stays on some weekdays. Nor is this the only large expense caused by the Home Secretary's decision to share her sister's house. Two policemen provide a round-the-clock guard at the South London property, costing taxpayers an estimated £200,000 a year. The two officers are stationed at the property on a shift basis. There would have been no need for such protection had Ms Smith opted to live in one of two vacant grace-and-favour ministerial homes in Whitehall when she became Home Secretary in 2007 as they already have police protection. But such a move would have affected Ms Smith's personal finances: Ministers who live in such properties are not allowed to claim the Commons second-home allowance. Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker last night called on Ms Smith to answer key questions about her Commons expenses. It seems extraordinarily bad value for the taxpayer,' said Mr Baker. 'This suggests that the steps taken to eliminate unsatisfactory elements of the housing allowance system have not yet been completed.' Ms Smith last night denied she had done anything wrong. Her spokeswoman said: 'Jacqui has documentation to prove that everything is completely above board. It has been cleared by the Commons Fees Office.' She denied that Ms Smith was benefiting by nominating her London address as her 'main home' instead of her constituency home, which is now thought to be worth considerably more than the £300,000 she paid for it. The spokeswoman said Ms Smith spends 'the bulk of the week' at her sister's home in London. Asked how many nights she stayed there, the spokeswoman said: 'She tends to go home Thursday evenings and returns on Sunday or Monday.' When it was pointed out that this suggested an average of three-and-a-half days a week, the spokeswoman replied: 'She doesn't count the number of nights.' Nor would Ms Smith disclose if she paid her sister rent. The Home Secretary 'makes a contribution to the household', said the spokeswoman, who refused to provide further details. The spokeswoman denied Ms Smith was 'lodging' with her sister, and said the two 'shared the house'.[/b] Labour are finished they are creating just as much sleaze as the Tories did at the end. It appears the press are now going after them. The taxpayer is just there to be bent over and screwed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slurms mackenzie Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 (edited) Throw her in the cells, but not before taking her DNA (no proof of conviction needed) and tazering the b1tch Edited February 8, 2009 by slurms mackenzie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HaveAniceDay Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Throw her in the cells, but not before taking her DNA (no proof of conviction needed) and tazering the b1tch + 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
zilly Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 So apparently the taxpayer footing a 200K bill so that she can pocket an extra 24K for herself is, in her eyes, 'doing nothing wrong'. I guess that's where her world view and mine diverge (and why I'd never make it in politics I suppose). Because I thought politicians were supposed to do what's best for US. Where did all the decent people go? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
geezer466 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Not a sniff of this story on the BBC..... Rewind 11 years to a time it was a Tory home secretary and it would be top item on page 1. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leonard Hatred Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 They should withdraw her ID card until she's found innocent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest mattsta1964 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Throw her in the cells, but not before taking her DNA (no proof of conviction needed) and tazering the b1tch Another Mussolini moment is in the offing I reckon Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LumpHammer Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Labour have had it. It's feeding time at the zoo! Tom Quote Link to post Share on other sites
petrodollar Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Not a sniff of this story on the BBC.....Rewind 11 years to a time it was a Tory home secretary and it would be top item on page 1. yes its Labour "Doing the right thing for hard working families" Have no worries the slime that comprises the nu-labor leadership are about to face the pressure washer of public opinion Quote Link to post Share on other sites
spivT Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Wonder where darling got the national mortgage interest relief idea plan from ? He only had to look down the table at the cabinet meeting, and the precedent was staring him right in the face !!! Except giving interest relief in the form of 'expenses' while your still in employment is just too much of a gift for the sheeple. That kind of largesse can only exist for cabinet ministers !!! It's like giving every adult int the country 50k each to pay down they're mortgages, you must be joking!!! it's much safer to give the sum total to the banks to plug they're balance sheets. And get the ponzi system going rather than empower the sheeple. IF anyone actually believes we're wealthier [mctavish that means you] and we're not actually being screwed over by a minority who receive all the grace and favour, then those who believe that are truly moronic [you again mctavish] Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UncleMeat Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...-main-home.html With her wages and security Jackboots costs the taxpayer just under half a million quid per year. That's one minister, imagine what the rest of the piggies are up to. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sinking Feeling Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 More snouts in the trough! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Minos Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...-main-home.htmlLabour are finished they are creating just as much sleaze as the Tories did at the end. It appears the press are now going after them. The taxpayer is just there to be bent over and screwed. Didn't you get the memo which stated that how much of your money they use for their expenses or remuneration is really none of your business? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tinker Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Just sickening. Real decent, honest people are finding it really tough now, and these troughers lord it over us with utter contempt. The taxpayer is being shafted and it is going on all over the country... in Parliament, in the Quangos, in the Town Halls... at the banks. It is out of control... and it seems to be getting worse. The greater the public plight, the more they take to stash away. Sickening. Truly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
@contradevian Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Not a sniff of this story on the BBC.....Rewind 11 years to a time it was a Tory home secretary and it would be top item on page 1. Yup didn't Norman Lamont have the misfortune to rent his BTL to a "sex worker?" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
got2laugh Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I can't even be angry with benefit fraudsters anymore when reading things like this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest mattsta1964 Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I can't even be angry with benefit fraudsters anymore when reading things like this. Agreed They are small fry compared with politicians and bankers Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dylan Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Her defence is that she stays in London from Monday to Friday (4 nights out of 7). There are 208 Monday to Friday nights (52 *4), and parliament is in recess for 79 of them so she, at most, stays in London for 35% of the year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EndToBoomandBust Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 (edited) This ZaNuLabour Government is the worst in British history. They are completely Shameless. I want to see their Portilo moment at the next election as the results are read out. Jackie Smith 15 votes Hazel Blears 10 Votes Harman 2 Votes Just to watch their pale faces as they realise that the people have just said F**koff. Edited February 8, 2009 by EndToBoomandBust Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ah-so Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Had this been a Tory under major, they would have been drummed out of office pretty quickly. Politicians are now so shameless that even when caught with their hands in the cookie jar, they deny that they have done anything wrong. We have seen much the same thing with the cash for amendments scandal (I write scandal, but what the hell happened to it?). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
interestrateripoff Posted February 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 yes its Labour"Doing the right thing for hard working families" Have no worries the slime that comprises the nu-labor leadership are about to face the pressure washer of public opinion Yep looking after there own family. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
time 2 raise interest rates Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 But Labour don't do sleaze, they just do. "No more boom and bust" "British jobs for British workers" "We have saved the World form all the fu*k ups the Americans caused" Next you will be saying Lord what's his face had a dodgy mortgage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ulfar Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I don't care whether she pays a million pounds in rent to her sister. Her primary residence should be the one she owns. she shouldn't be allowed any second home allowance as she does have the availability of a grace and favour home. Ministers who don't have a grace and favour home should only be allowed to claim up to LHA levels, maybe if they had to live with the conditions the rest of us do we might get better government, it would certainly be cheaper. This I am afraid demonstrates the corruption of MP's, especially Labour who seem to have lost any morals they had to begin with. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dylan Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 This is what the Government think of anyone that complains about them wasting taxpayers money Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Orsino Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Consider which politicians have their snouts most firmly in the trough. Ruth Kelly has all kinds of expenses wheezes on the go and last year gave up her p1ss-poor ministerial career, no doubt so she could look for lucrative employment in the private sector. She has a majority of just 2064. Jacqui Smith is no different; she has a majority in her Redditch constituency of 2716. Many of these Labour politicians already know they are out of a job in a little over a year's time. They are milking the taxpayer for every penny they can get while they still can. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.