NJP Posted May 30, 2005 Report Share Posted May 30, 2005 I'm 31, and due to a recent jump in my salary and I'm now in a position to save 1000 per month towards a deposit on a house when prices hopefully become more reasonable. However, I don't currently have a pension of any kind. Would I be better continuing to save towards a deposit for the next couple of years, or put (say) 300 a month of that into a pension? Suggestions welcomed. Thanks! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MarkG Posted May 30, 2005 Report Share Posted May 30, 2005 The upside of putting money in a pension is that it's tax-free. The downside is that you're relying on the company still being there thirty-five years from now and having maintained the value of your money in real terms. Personally the company I work for matches contributions up to some percentage, so that's exactly the amount I pay in. Beyond that I don't think the benefit of recovering the tax is worth the risk of never seeing the money again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NJP Posted May 31, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2005 Thanks, Mark. How about saving for retirement in general, though? Would I be better off doing that asap, or waiting until after I'd bought a house (with a bigger deposit)? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Killer Bunny Posted June 3, 2005 Report Share Posted June 3, 2005 How about saving for retirement in general, though? Would I be better off doing that asap, or waiting until after I'd bought a house (with a bigger deposit)?<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Work out what income you need in retirement. Assume no mortgage and kids (if you succeed in paying off these by retirement). Say it was £15,000 pa in today's money (+ State pension which will be not a lot) that would be £42k pa in 35 years at 3% inflation (multiply by 2.81). Annuity rate for 65 yr old / spouse / 3% escalation in payment is c. 4% ie you would need a pension fund of - are you ready? : £1.05M Thus at 6% pa investment growth you need to put in £750 pm Shall I repeat that because you look stunned! Does that help answer your question? People just do not realise the cost of retirement. Make your choices well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Unexpected Posted June 3, 2005 Report Share Posted June 3, 2005 Work out what income you need in retirement. Assume no mortgage and kids (if you succeed in paying off these by retirement). Say it was £15,000 pa in today's money (+ State pension which will be not a lot) that would be £42k pa in 35 years at 3% inflation (multiply by 2.81).Annuity rate for 65 yr old / spouse / 3% escalation in payment is c. 4% ie you would need a pension fund of - are you ready? : £1.05M Thus at 6% pa investment growth you need to put in £750 pm Shall I repeat that because you look stunned! Does that help answer your question? People just do not realise the cost of retirement. Make your choices well. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Na! That cant be done , and if you try to do it but fail then the government will sh4ft you. As I think someone else said on a previous thread: Buy gold coins with all your savings so the government thinks you are broke. Then you can go on full benefits including housing and have your gold coins to spend in your twilight years. You should be able to buy an oz or two these days with the money you save by renting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Meditating Hamster Posted June 5, 2005 Report Share Posted June 5, 2005 Na! That cant be done , and if you try to do it but fail then the government will sh4ft you. As I think someone else said on a previous thread: Buy gold coins with all your savings so the government thinks you are broke. Then you can go on full benefits including housing and have your gold coins to spend in your twilight years. You should be able to buy an oz or two these days with the money you save by renting. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Don't know about gold, but diamonds would be an a very dodgy investment, apparently scientists have now found a way of making decent sized diamonds out of any lump of carbon. I assume it's an expensive process, but if they can refine it, then that may mean devaluation in the diamond market within our lifetime. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Unexpected Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 Don't know about gold, but diamonds would be an a very dodgy investment, apparently scientists have now found a way of making decent sized diamonds out of any lump of carbon. I assume it's an expensive process, but if they can refine it, then that may mean devaluation in the diamond market within our lifetime.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Gold is made from Gold whereas Diamonds are made from Carbon. Gold is a metal listed on the Chemical periodic table therefore it cannot be made from another compound. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
muyuubyou Posted June 6, 2005 Report Share Posted June 6, 2005 Gold is made from Gold whereas Diamonds are made from Carbon. Gold is a metal listed on the Chemical periodic table therefore it cannot be made from another compound. It can be made from other compounds (Gold is not a "compound" but let's forget about that now), it just takes too much energy and there is no profitable known way to do it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Unexpected Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 It can be made from other compounds (Gold is not a "compound" but let's forget about that now), it just takes too much energy and there is no profitable known way to do it.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> It seems we are both wrong. "A chemical compound is a chemical substance formed from two or more elements" Therefore as I have described gold it cannot be a compound. And as you have described gold [ "It can be made from other compounds (Gold is not a "compound" but let's forget about that now)" ], it must be a compound. So can you please tell me what is the unprofitable way to make gold. I am no chemistry expert and was trying to make an educated guess in my first statement. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
muyuubyou Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 It seems we are both wrong. "A chemical compound is a chemical substance formed from two or more elements" Therefore as I have described gold it cannot be a compound. And as you have described gold [ "It can be made from other compounds (Gold is not a "compound" but let's forget about that now)" ], it must be a compound. So can you please tell me what is the unprofitable way to make gold. I am no chemistry expert and was trying to make an educated guess in my first statement. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> http://www.rexresearch.com/moray/moray.htm Search for "changed into gold" There are some processes yielding gold from lead. On a side note, particle accelerators transmute elements routinely. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Unexpected Posted June 7, 2005 Report Share Posted June 7, 2005 http://www.rexresearch.com/moray/moray.htmSearch for "changed into gold" There are some processes yielding gold from lead. On a side note, particle accelerators transmute elements routinely. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks muyuubyou. I'll start getting the lab set up tonight. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
theChuz Posted June 9, 2005 Report Share Posted June 9, 2005 Gold is made from Gold whereas Diamonds are made from Carbon. Gold is a metal listed on the Chemical periodic table therefore it cannot be made from another compound.<{POST_SNAPBACK}> dont tell no one yea but i just done did the lead to gold thing, sssshhh though Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrsMole Posted August 8, 2005 Report Share Posted August 8, 2005 Gold is an ELEMENT I'm sure you knew that already It would take more than chemistry to synthesize it...it would take nuclear physics. It happens in the stars!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
penbat1 Posted August 9, 2005 Report Share Posted August 9, 2005 (edited) Yeah you get tax relief on the pension contributions but you have to pay income tax on the resultant annuity. Annuities are very low these days. Also pensions are very complicated and are inflexible - there are all sorts of associated rules. Personally i would just put long term savings (10 years minimum) in a stock market index tracker. You would get more flexibility than a pension - can take as much or as liitle out whenever you like and you are only taxed if you excced the capital gains limit per year (you could use your annual ISA limits to avoid this anyway). Edited August 9, 2005 by penbat1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gundog Posted August 11, 2005 Report Share Posted August 11, 2005 What you need is more than £1000 per month. Try looking at a Network Marketing Business. They bring in good money if you pick the right one and work at it Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.